Best Of
Re: Weekend limerick contest - let’s party
Oh, a wondrous bird is the pelican!
His beak holds more than his belican.
He takes in his beak
Food enough for a week.
But I'll be darned if I know how the helican.
Re: Weekend limerick contest - let’s party
There once was a dealer named Gladys
Her Morgan’s cheeks were fattest
Said, “My exomunia
Is enough to ruin ya”
I said, “Yeah? I’m new to the practice”
Creg
Re: Weekend limerick contest - let’s party
Here are a few numismatic limericks with different flavors:
1. The Collector’s Lament
There once was a Mint with great nerve,
Whose prices continued to swerve.
They said with a grin,
“Collectors will spin—
And pay what the markets deserve.”
2. Secondary Market Edition
A collector declared with delight,
“These proof sets are climbing in flight!”
The Mint looked around,
Raised prices profound—
And said, “Why should dealers do right?”
3. The Slab Collector
A coin in a plasticized shell
Was purchased for values that swell.
But once grades declined,
The owner did find—
His “investment” was numismatical hell.
4. Mint Strategy
The Mint raised its prices one year,
Collectors all shouted in fear.
Yet sales stayed alive,
Enough did survive—
So the pricing committee drank beer.
5. Slightly More Literary
A numismatist careful and wise
Watched premiums suddenly rise.
He muttered, “Take heed—
This market has greed…”
Then bought one more set “for supplies.”
6. For the Long-Time Collector
There once was a hobby of joy,
Where folders gave thrills to each boy.
Now subscriptions and gold
Leave collectors grown old—
And the Mint chasing profit, oh boy.
Re: Now I'm curious, raised error on 1971 proof nickel someone posted on reddit...
This image tells me that the anomaly is raised when I look at the angle of approach of the light to the south, vs the shadowing seen to the north, as seen on the nearby letters.
.

Rc5280
Re: VG Seated dollar definition
@Goob said:
To be fair it is a little nicer in-hand, but I agree it seems a little iffy for being close to Fine.
The reverse definitely carries the grade, might be borderline-fine (photo does not do it justice) but I’m surprised the obverse didn’t make it tank! I will also say though, the eye appeal is pretty good for being a lower grade.
By the old standards, the reverse would barely be VG. And the reverse counts for less. The standards have been diluted. I mean, that coin is a decent Good, by the original standards. And it is VGish by the TPG standards. The issue was the standards, not the coin.
Re: A fairly recent 2026 addition - “Crust-Zilla” $50 Assay Slug
Based on the images provided, I’d say that’s A fairly decent, fairly recent 2026 addition - “Crust-Zilla” $50 Assay Slug.😉
It’s also as, if not more original looking, than any circulated example I’ve seen. It’s a “Wowza” coin.
MFeld
Re: Recent PSA grading results
I'd generally agree that grading vintage cards is tougher today vs years ago but I still see weak cards for the grade in new holders as well as razor sharp cards for the grade in old holders. As someone once wisely said, buy the card not the holder. It's foolish to discount older flips or to blindly assume the newer ones are better.
grote15
Re: Now I'm curious, raised error on 1971 proof nickel someone posted on reddit...
@Kurisu said:
The OP confirmed it's raised.
Seems too "neat" to be a gouge.
Couldn't be a dropped bit of letter, correct?
Clearly not a strike through.
I'm baffled and now I really want to know what this anomaly is...Original post https://www.reddit.com/r/coinerrors/comments/1tjxihs/error_on_a_1971s_proof_nickel_retained/
EDIT: it appears to be a known variety.
If it's raised then it can't be a dropped letter, since a dropped letter would be struck into the coin.
However...I'm going to be a contrarian and suggest that the Reddit poster is incorrect, and that the anomaly is in fact incuse, in which case it is some sort of scrap, including possibly a dropped letter fragment.
Look at this photo. There is light reflection on both sides of the anomaly. On the other letters, there is only light reflection on the top side of the letters.
The light reflection underneath the anomaly would not be possible if it was raised.


It seems impossible that someone actually holding the coin could be mistaken about whether a feature is raised or incuse, but just a few weeks ago here on the Forum a poster insisted for days that the ampersand that appeared on both sides of his cent were raised but he finally conceded that he figured out that they were incused.
JBK
Re: The Buena Park Coin Show (June 12-13) has been CANCELLED
@MsMorrisine said:
it was a joke, thus Big Grin. always sunny in so cal
Yeah, everything is great. The quakes created the mudslides which put out the fires.
jom
jom
Re: Weekend limerick contest - let’s party
There once was a man named Russ,
Who never put up a fuss,
His intentions were clear,
Accented Hair he did endear,
His knowledge bestowed upon us.




