Best Of

65 Brown with slightly muted yet pleasing luster.

@ebaybuyer2 said:
this one didnt seem to bother them ... even gave it a gold shield...
ill admit the re-engraving is fairly well done but its still re-engraved

That's a mistake not a policy

@jfriedm56 said:
As TomB stated, the grades in the photo. Am I missing something?

Either those who have guessed didn’t notice the grade or did, but guessed as if they were unaware of it. That might not apply to quite everyone, however.

I probably would have guessed XF45.

While, generally, I wouldn't say I like when the first comment in a thread goes off topic, I think it would be a shame for us all not to take a moment to recognize that this is an exceptional example of how discussion threads are supposed to be presented.

1. Clear and effective thread title that leaves readers with no questions about the content of the thread. Cacmudgeons cant say they thought it would be about something else.

2. First paragraph expands on the title and gives a direct objective of the discussion.

3. Body gives context to the topic and uses specific examples of the data they are using. as the basis, as if the readers may or may not have any knowledge of it beforehand.

4. Author provides their own observations and gathered data sets from their own experience, using precise language to differentiate their (well informed) opinion from any demontratable facts.

5. Sets an expectation for the type of answers they are hoping to receive, and reminds us again what the objective is, and what we could takeaway from an educational standpoint.

These are the type of threads that typically yield the best discussions, and are the least likely to to devolve into trolling and worthless arguments. When you give your thread the best chance of success, the entire forum benefits and we all learn more as a result. Newer forum members might want to take note of how this topic is presented, and also take note of Tom's reputation here, well-respected and highly regarded as "one of guys you should listen to".

Anyway, I do apologize for the OT tangent but I felt that it was time for a reminder, as threads like this seem less frequent in recent times. PLEASE do not quote me or respond to this comment, as I want Tom's beautiful post to stay on track. If you must, send me a pm or use another thread.

My guess was VF35, but I know better.

It looks like you included the assigned grade in the first image posted, but I won't tell anyone.

Slab grade AU-50. Yes, it might come back as “cleaned” today although I don’t see and “organized” cleaning likes.

It’s not a “look” that I would buy for my collection, but the coin is well struck with all of the design details defined.