Home U.S. Coin Forum
Options

Two 1796 Dimes PCGS MS67 & MS68 Photos-which do you like?

SethChandlerSethChandler Posts: 1,719 ✭✭✭✭
Ok, help me understand something, these coins are wayyy outta my league, but I love them both. What puzzles me is the price difference. But If I won the lottery, I'm a buyer of one, so I gotta pick. But for now, its for my coin fantasy league team.

What puzzles me is the price difference:
1796 Dime PCGS MS67 CAC $881k
1796 Dime PCGS MS68 CAC $793k
The 68, the finer of the two, sold for 10% less, and they both sold just recently within 2 months of each other. Why? Seems like the 68 is better according to PCGS and CAC. Ron Howard, the Yoda of grading for PCGS, says its is favorite Federal Coin, ever. Yes, ever. Yet it sold for less. Any idea why?
I have attached the PCGS CoinFacts Photos, and Heritage photos.

Which coin do you like?

On a side note, the quality of the PCGS photos is mind blowing, really, Great Job.

The MS67 is first, the MS68 is second.

image
image

image
image
image
image
Collecting since 1976.

Comments

  • JustacommemanJustacommeman Posts: 22,852 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Door number 1……….the 67

    MJ
    Walker Proof Digital Album
    Fellas, leave the tight pants to the ladies. If I can count the coins in your pockets you better use them to call a tailor. Stay thirsty my friends......
  • NicNic Posts: 3,411 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Many believe the 67 is a specimen strike. I've held both in hand and prefer the 67 as well.

    K
  • mdwoodsmdwoods Posts: 5,559 ✭✭✭
    Oooooooooh, aaaaaaaah. Such lovely coins. I suppose I could settle for either one. image
    National Register Of Big Trees

    We'll use our hands and hearts and if we must we'll use our heads.
  • CharlotteDudeCharlotteDude Posts: 3,165 ✭✭✭✭✭
    While I'd love to have either, if one were to twist my arm, I'd go w/the MS-67.

    cheers,

    'dude
    Got Crust....y gold?
  • jcpingjcping Posts: 2,649 ✭✭✭
    Technically, 68 might have better surface. $$$ goes into eye appealing, too. If I can choose between the two, I take that 67 any time, any day. Also, the die cracks might not be part of the grading but someone might simply don't like it.
    an SLQ and Ike dollars lover
  • guitarwesguitarwes Posts: 9,290 ✭✭✭
    I think the 67 has more eye appeal which is why it might have brought more $$$. The die cracks and the slight splotch of toning take away a little from the 68.

    Which one sold first? If 2 big fish want the same thing the price is higher. After the losing fish missed it they (or the other potential buyers) were not inclined to purchase the other one at that high or higher of a price.
    @ Elite CNC Routing & Woodworks on Facebook. Check out my work.
    Too many positive BST transactions with too many members to list.
  • johnny9434johnny9434 Posts: 29,216 ✭✭✭✭✭
    the top one. both are wicked nice
  • rmpsrpmsrmpsrpms Posts: 1,953 ✭✭✭✭✭
    From the PCGS photos there is no question in my mind that the 67 is the superior coin. If I had seen only the 68, I would have said "nice coin, sort of odd looking with the die cracks and uneven toning but what can you ask for from a dime from 1796". But seeing the 67, it is in a whole different league than the 68!

    Assigned grade really is just a starting point in assessment of a coin, and these two coins point this out very dramatically.
    PM me for coin photography equipment, or visit my website:

    http://macrocoins.com
  • CoinJunkieCoinJunkie Posts: 8,772 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Would have to see them in hand to render final judgment, but from those photos, I'd take the MS68 coin.
    It just has more character and I actually prefer the slightly lighter toning.
  • BillJonesBillJones Posts: 34,793 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I'll go with the MS-67. I prefer early die states when I can get them. I also prefer the eye appeal of the less grade piece.
    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • leothelyonleothelyon Posts: 8,489 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>I think the 67 has more eye appeal which is why it might have brought more $$$. The die cracks and the slight splotch of toning take away a little from the 68.

    Which one sold first? If 2 big fish want the same thing the price is higher. After the losing fish missed it they (or the other potential buyers) were not inclined to purchase the other one at that high or higher of a price. >>



    My exact sentiments but I can't see someone getting cold feet (thinking it's going to break them bidding any higher) when they're buying a coin for close to a million. They had to or someone made that decision for them that the 68 wasn't as nice as the 67 so the 68 should be valued for less. Yeah, I think the underbidder on the 68 is kicking himself for listening to such logic. Unless another superb example is known and coming up for auction soon.
    So the 67 now stands a chance going 68 and how much more will it be worth? 1.2 million?
    I don't believe money was the issue. Something else is playing into the equation but what? hmmm
    Sometimes when one bidder is known to be a dealer, the other might reason that since he's the only buyer, why up the price?
    These are all the generalizations I have and adding my poor 2 cents for rich folks, arrogant rich folks can't do.

    Nice coins, by the way!



    Leo image

    The more qualities observed in a coin, the more desirable that coin becomes!

    My Jefferson Nickel Collection

  • MFHMFH Posts: 11,720 ✭✭✭✭


    << <i>I'll go with the MS-67. I prefer early die states when I can get them. I also prefer the eye appeal of the less grade piece. >>



    I will go along with Bill, he knows his stuff !!
    I like the 67 more regardless.

    Mike Hayes
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Coin collecting is not a hobby, it's an obsession !

    New Barber Purchases
  • joebb21joebb21 Posts: 4,769 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The 67 as was stated is a questionable Specimen as it surely has a stronger strike. With that in mind, it brought 881k.
    The other coin was a "regular" ms68 and set its own record for what it brought
    may the fonz be with you...always...
  • Halfhunter06Halfhunter06 Posts: 1,332 ✭✭✭
    The first one all the way!
  • Walkerguy21DWalkerguy21D Posts: 11,696 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Amazing that there are two such coins like this in existence.....
    Successful BST transactions with 171 members. Ebeneezer, Tonedeaf, Shane6596, Piano1, Ikenefic, RG, PCGSPhoto, stman, Don'tTelltheWife, Boosibri, Ron1968, snowequities, VTchaser, jrt103, SurfinxHI, 78saen, bp777, FHC, RYK, JTHawaii, Opportunity, Kliao, bigtime36, skanderbeg, split37, thebigeng, acloco, Toninginthblood, OKCC, braddick, Coinflip, robcool, fastfreddie, tightbudget, DBSTrader2, nickelsciolist, relaxn, Eagle eye, soldi, silverman68, ElKevvo, sawyerjosh, Schmitz7, talkingwalnut2, konsole, sharkman987, sniocsu, comma, jesbroken, David1234, biosolar, Sullykerry, Moldnut, erwindoc, MichaelDixon, GotTheBug
  • stealerstealer Posts: 4,035 ✭✭✭✭
    If I'm trying to buy a business strike, I'd want it to have creamy luster like the 68. I dislike proof like early strikes because they just don't look business strike-y.
  • BryceMBryceM Posts: 11,856 ✭✭✭✭✭
    At this level, the number on the holder is an important part of determining value, but the grade to value relationship is much looser than for more commonly traded "middle-ground" coins (say MS66-67 Morgans). Stratospheric coins sell based on their individual merits and it shouldn't be too surprising that two coins a grade apart sell in the same ballpark.

    ...... leastwise that's my take on a market that I don't play in or claim to understand.

    BTW, I prefer the MS68 as the die cracks and such give it so much character. If I was ever to be a serious buyer, the only way to know would be to view them in-hand. Photos can be so different than the in-hand look.
  • rmpsrpmsrmpsrpms Posts: 1,953 ✭✭✭✭✭
    After further deliberation I have decided to pass on both and wait for a better example. image
    PM me for coin photography equipment, or visit my website:

    http://macrocoins.com
  • BroadstruckBroadstruck Posts: 30,497 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I would want to own the MS67 ex Hayes... On the MS68 I'd rather have the cash.
    To Err Is Human.... To Collect Err's Is Just Too Much Darn Tootin Fun!
  • CoinZipCoinZip Posts: 3,253 ✭✭✭
    There are several possibilities why the higher graded coin brought less money.

    I would agree with the general consensus here and say the eye appeal is most likely what drove the price.

    Other factors could be:

    1. Die Marriage maybe the 67 is the highest graded of that marriage ???
    2. Die Marriage maybe the 67 is a rare die marriage ???
    3. Removing one of the players, if the 67 sold first its possible the new owner no longer needs to fill that hole ???
    4. Marketing maybe there was more effort to publicize the 67 ???
    5. competition from other auction lots, maybe there were other high end coins that held the 68 back ???

    Coin Club Benefit auctions ..... View the Lots

  • MidLifeCrisisMidLifeCrisis Posts: 10,550 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I'd choose the 67...by a country mile.

    Although the 67 has probably been cleaned, the 68 *looks* like it's been cleaned. I do not like that look (the 68) on such an old coin. It's just unnatural.

    Plus I don't like the die cracks on the 68. Sure they add some character, but at that grade level and for that kind of money I just think they are distracting because they are in a prime focal area.

    This is a great example of how grade doesn't always equal value.
  • LanLordLanLord Posts: 11,723 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I too prefer the 67.
    It looks nicer to my eyes.

    That said, if I won the lottery, I'd buy both.
  • goldengolden Posts: 9,994 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I will take door #1.
  • etexmikeetexmike Posts: 6,852 ✭✭✭
    Hard to find fault with either coin but I am with the gang on this one. The 67 is the one.


    Mike
  • ms70ms70 Posts: 13,956 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I have to depart with popular opinion & go with the 68. It just seems to have so much more character with the die cracks, etc. But I DO love them both!

    Great transactions with oih82w8, JasonGaming, Moose1913.

  • 67 for eye appeal and 68 as an error(IMO). The 67 has cleaner devices as the devices are obscured by the die cracks on the 68.
  • I love the Hayes MS67, but since I can't have that, I'll take "door number three" !!!
    The James A. Stack JR-4 (and finest known of variety)
    PCGS MS66 CAC, formerly NGC MS67*

    These are not the best images, but it's a fantastic coin with some prooflike qualities as well.
    The coin is nicely centered with borders - these images just aren't cropped properly ...

    imageimage
  • ElcontadorElcontador Posts: 7,684 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The first image to me is more attractive. I'm with Bill, on these coins, I'll take the early die state coin. I am curious as to the grades on these coins' holders fifteen years ago.
    "Vou invadir o Nordeste,
    "Seu cabra da peste,
    "Sou Mangueira......."
  • EastonCollectionEastonCollection Posts: 1,527 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I agree with Sunnywood and prefer the 1796 JR-4 from the James Stacks pedigree as my favorite of all the '96 dimes. The others are wonderful coins too and if I had to chose between the 2 I prefer the ms67. Why i suspect the 68 sold for less money is very difficult to know but I think it was just timing. More folks bidding on the 67 at the time, 1 dropped out when the 68 came up in auction not longer after...... Why have 2 1796 dimes and the 67 is a dup!
    Easton Collection
  • BullsitterBullsitter Posts: 5,893 ✭✭✭✭✭
    67...no contest, imo...............image
  • roadrunnerroadrunner Posts: 28,313 ✭✭✭✭✭
    As mentioned by several already, the 67 seems to beat out the 68 on strike, eye appeal, toning, less distractions, pedigree, etc. I'd add that the high point scuffs are more obvious on the MS68.

    Take them out of the holders back to the raw days and the MS67 probably wins out. Big time sets these days are more into eye appeal and matching the other coins in their sets...than just the numerical grade.

    The James Stack MS66 is pretty darn nice too. image
    Barbarous Relic No More, LSCC -GoldSeek--shadow stats--SafeHaven--321gold
  • DennisHDennisH Posts: 14,010 ✭✭✭✭✭
    MS67.
    The eye appeal is over the top for me.
    When in doubt, don't.
  • stealerstealer Posts: 4,035 ✭✭✭✭


    << <i>I love the Hayes MS67, but since I can't have that, I'll take "door number three" !!!
    The James A. Stack JR-4 (and finest known of variety)
    PCGS MS66 CAC, formerly NGC MS67*

    These are not the best images, but it's a fantastic coin with some prooflike qualities as well.
    The coin is nicely centered with borders - these images just aren't cropped properly ...

    imageimage >>


    Now the real question is, which two of the coins are goats and which one is the sports car???

    I hear Monty has a love-sickness for Betsy.
  • In this particular case I prefer the eye appeal of the ms67 over the (superior ?) quality of the MS 68
  • lordmarcovanlordmarcovan Posts: 43,859 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Number one is number one.

    But oh, my. Both are incredible.

    Explore collections of lordmarcovan on CollecOnline, management, safe-keeping, sharing and valuation solution for art piece and collectibles.
  • lasvegasteddylasvegasteddy Posts: 10,432 ✭✭✭
    yeah the 67 looks like a specimen strike which even adds more appeal to me...like a cameo
    no brainer
    in the 67 crowd here
    everything in life is but merely on loan to us by our appreciation....lose your appreciation and see


Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file