I have a rule about slamming the same coin twice in one week. Someone ATS asked their opinion about that coin last week. My guess is NO LUSTER AT ALL, hence the grade. The surfaces are definitely better than MS60. Silent Net Grade IMO.
The color looks more like something that came out of an ink bottle than a reaction between the coin and chemicals from cloth or paper.
Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
<< <i>I personally do not find it attractive but what is more disturbing is that someone paid $177.50 for it. >>
That would be me. More disturbing is the amount of my snipe I had in play. I am drawn to whacky stuff. Fun for me, not so much for my wife when she attempts to cash it all in after my demise.
<< <i>I'm sorry, but I don't like it at all. The luster looks muted by the color, and I'm not a fan of the toning myself. >>
Never a need to apologize. All opinions welcome, even if the vast majority are negative toward something I find positive. It's what I enjoy most about these forums. I learn something new just about every single day because collectors and dealers here know they're safe in rendering an opinion and judgement.
The main thing that really bothers me is the MS60 grade- that is rarely used and I am not sure why 60 was used here- other than they did not like the color
Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.
Comments
.....................................................
<< <i>I know Peace Dollars are hard to find toned, But that is a ugly coin to me! >>
Probably the reason it only got MS-60-ed
I appreciate the opinions so far.
MS60 is a bit of an unusual grade and generally denotes a very unattractive coin.
peacockcoins
<< <i>MS60 is a bit of an unusual grade and generally denotes a very unattractive coin. >>
Or, back then perhaps a bit shy on the color?
-D
-Aristotle
Dum loquimur fugerit invida aetas. Carpe diem quam minimum credula postero.
-Horace
See http://www.doubledimes.com for a free online reference for US twenty-cent pieces
Sugar magnolia blossoms blooming, heads all empty and I don't care ...
<< <i>MS60 is a bit of an unusual grade and generally denotes a very unattractive coin. >>
And perhaps someone's science experiment.
So i guess someone loves that baby.
Doesn't ring my bell though......
Happy, humble, honored and proud recipient of the “You Suck” award 10/22/2014
The color looks more like something that came out of an ink bottle than a reaction between the coin and chemicals from cloth or paper.
The pattern looks like album toning, but the coloration is odd.
this coin says "walk away" to me.
<< <i>I personally do not find it attractive but what is more disturbing is that someone paid $177.50 for it. >>
That would be me.
More disturbing is the amount of my snipe I had in play.
I am drawn to whacky stuff. Fun for me, not so much for my wife when she attempts to cash it all in after my demise.
peacockcoins
not bad at all.
<< <i>I'm sorry, but I don't like it at all. The luster looks muted by the color, and I'm not a fan of the toning myself. >>
Never a need to apologize. All opinions welcome, even if the vast majority are negative toward something I find positive.
It's what I enjoy most about these forums.
I learn something new just about every single day because collectors and dealers here know they're safe in rendering an opinion and judgement.
peacockcoins
Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.
Lance.
Happy New Year to you guys!
peacockcoins
<< <i>^Will do.
Happy New Year to you guys! >>
Happy New Year Pat.
I too would like to see new pics of this one.