Home U.S. Coin Forum
Options

A stupid and costly grading experiment: Results are in.

RYKRYK Posts: 35,799 ✭✭✭✭✭
Today I sent off 7 NGC-graded New Orleans gold coins for crossover service. Allowing 3 days to arrive in CA, 2 days to get processed, and 7 days to grade, I should have the results in two weeks.

Here are the coins and what I think about their chances. (In parentheses, the current PCGS population for each in the current grades, and higher grades):

1. 1859-O $10 NGC-45: No brainer cross. An original, no problem coin that is solid for the grade. So dirty that a trip to NCS might get the coin bumped to 50, but not on my watch! (10/19)

2. 1855-O $10 NGC-58: Lustrous, but dipped, overall very attractive; the coin is all there. One rim hit at 12 o'clock on the obverse detracts. I have noticed that the plastic edge of the NGC holder tends to magnify or call one's attention to any rim issues. Slim chance of crossover. (1/2)

3. 1857-O $20 NGC-45: Nice, original choice XF-45 coin. Should cross. (21/57)

4. 1856-O $10 NGC-55: I used to think that this coin was overgraded but have since seen numerous 55 in PCGS holders similarly struck with sunken dies. At any rate, this is the only coin in which I indicated a minimum grade below that the coin is currently graded (53). (3/8)

5. 1846-O $10 NGC-53: Really nice coin for the grade, but who knows? 50-50. (3/0) image

6. 1852-O $10 NGC-55: One of my personal favorites in my New Orleans $10 collection. Should cross. (5/3)

7. 1844-O $10 NGC-58: Very nice coin, but again, who knows? (4/2)

Grade aside, one thing that goes against any of these AU coins crossing is that we are getting into the low pop/condition census range, and from what I hear, PCGS is resistent to make new coins in the stratosphere grades.

Final prediction:

The XF coins both cross (2/2), and one AU (1/5) crosses.

Comments

  • I wish I had something informative to say but don't know squat about gold, so..........I'll just sayimage
    Everything I write is my opinion.

    Looking for alot of crap.
  • ERER Posts: 7,345
    Costly, maybe, but stupid? Let me get back to you on that one.image
  • streeterstreeter Posts: 4,312 ✭✭✭✭✭


    RYK

    Being a newb on this, I must ask....why didn't you crackout?
    Have a nice day
  • RYKRYK Posts: 35,799 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Being a newb on this, I must ask....why didn't you crackout?

    Two reasons:
    1. I am afraid that the coin will get harmed by me or in transit.
    2. I did not want to risk the coin getting bagged or significantly downgraded for fear of further financial pain. On the other hand, I think having the coin submitted as a crossover reduces the chance of it getting crossed.
    3. A propos to #2, I am a chicken. image
  • jdimmickjdimmick Posts: 9,776 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Good luck and keep us posted. Will definitely be educational?
  • LanLordLanLord Posts: 11,723 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Any of that horrible flotsam that doesn't cross, feel free to just give away right here on the coin forum.
  • streeterstreeter Posts: 4,312 ✭✭✭✭✭


    If you hear the big sucking sound on this experiment.......

    try it again in 6 months with crackouts and mix things up...
    The way a friend of mine sells over priced dogs is to stick them individually between two Ferrari's. The dog looks cheap by comparison.
    Works every time. You need to borrow some 63-66 stuff.

    Don't the dealers try it until they succeed?

    Didn't one artist just return 11,000 broken cases back to PCGS?




    Have a nice day
  • PerryHallPerryHall Posts: 46,824 ✭✭✭✭✭
    RYK---If you are happy with the coins and their current grades, why not leave them in their NGC holders? You never struck me as a Koolaid drinker.

    Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
    "Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
    "Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire

  • RYKRYK Posts: 35,799 ✭✭✭✭✭
    RYK---If you are happy with the coins and their current grades, why not leave them in their NGC holders? You never struck me as a Koolaid drinker.

    Because I felt like subjecting my coins to this costly and stupid experiment. image
  • ElcontadorElcontador Posts: 7,680 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The impression I have, based on recent experience and what I've heard, is that unless the NGC coins are cherry for the grades, they will not cross at same grade to PCGS holders.
    "Vou invadir o Nordeste,
    "Seu cabra da peste,
    "Sou Mangueira......."
  • CameonutCameonut Posts: 7,379 ✭✭✭✭✭
    It might be costly but I don't necessarily think it is stupid.

    If the submission yields knowledge about how PCGS grades with respect to NGC, that knowledge is valuable. It may even give you a bit of a competitive advantage.

    I consider these types of submissions to be like "tuition for my coin grading education". When viewed in that light, it can hardly be called stupid unless you go overboard unnecessarily.

    “In matters of style, swim with the current; in matters of principle, stand like a rock." - Thomas Jefferson

    My digital cameo album 1950-64 Cameos - take a look!

  • ReeceReece Posts: 378 ✭✭✭
    RYK-PCGS published crossover rate is about 33% so if 3 cross you are doing pretty good, by the way if any cross, any chance you might want to sell, still have the coin blahhs!!image
    RWK
  • RYKRYK Posts: 35,799 ✭✭✭✭✭
    RYK-PCGS published crossover rate is about 33% so if 3 cross you are doing pretty good, by the way if any cross, any chance you might want to sell, still have the coin blahhs!!

    Reece, the coin blahs are history! I am fully engaged.
  • ReeceReece Posts: 378 ✭✭✭
    RATS!!
    RWK
  • RYK, good luck on the attempt image and keep us posted on the results! After my one and only try ( a group of 10 went 1 for 10) decided to save the fees and just leave them in the plastic they are inimage
    steve

    myCCset
  • RYKRYK Posts: 35,799 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Results are in and are mixed, but not unexpected. image

    The good news is that the most valuable coin in the group (59-O $10) crossed to 45, as did the 57-O $20 (ahem, Reece).

    The 56-O $10 crossed from NGC AU-55 to PCGS AU-53. I allowed the one point drop because I thought the coin might be aggressively graded. In retrospect, the coin is a dead ringer for the 1848-O $10 in PCGS AU-55 that I own.

    The 55-O $10 AU-58, as expected, did not cross.

    The 44-O, 46-O, and 52-O all did not cross. I have seen lesser coins in like grade PCGS holders, and I would guess that if I cracked the coins out and resubmitted them, one or two would cross, maybe all eventually. image
  • RussRuss Posts: 48,514 ✭✭✭


    << <i>The 56-O $10 crossed from NGC AU-55 to PCGS AU-53. I allowed the one point drop >>



    I've been out of school a long time, but I'm pretty sure 55 minus 53 is two points. image

    Russ, NCNE
  • RYKRYK Posts: 35,799 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I've been out of school a long time, but I'm pretty sure 55 minus 53 is two points. image

    By convention, many of those of us that buy/sell circulated coins consider each grading step on the grading scale to be a point.
  • ReeceReece Posts: 378 ✭✭✭
    Wow nice!! I think that both coins that crossed the 57-0 $20 and the 56-0 $10 should be sold immediately to fund your purchases for your new Dansco 7070 album!! I can think of only one person who might be interested!!image
    RWK
  • 1jester1jester Posts: 8,637 ✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>The 56-O $10 crossed from NGC AU-55 to PCGS AU-53. I allowed the one point drop >>



    I've been out of school a long time, but I'm pretty sure 55 minus 53 is two points. image

    Russ, NCNE >>



    Please show me an AU-54 coin.....image

    imageimageimage
    .....GOD
    image

    "Ask, and it shall be given you; seek, and ye shall find; knock, and it shall be opened unto you." -Luke 11:9

    "Hear, O Israel: The LORD our God is one LORD: And thou shalt love the LORD thy God with all thine heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy might." -Deut. 6:4-5

    "For the LORD is our judge, the LORD is our lawgiver, the LORD is our king; He will save us." -Isaiah 33:22
  • RYKRYK Posts: 35,799 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Wow nice!! I think that both coins that crossed the 57-0 $20 and the 56-0 $10 should be sold immediately to fund your purchases for your new Dansco 7070 album!!

    Yes, I could probably buy one or two for the Dansco with the proceeds from those. image
  • FatManFatMan Posts: 8,977
    Now you have to finish the experiment.image Crack them all out and resubmit raw. We need to get the to the truth regarding whether it is better to send them in for crossover service or to send them in raw.
  • RYKRYK Posts: 35,799 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Now you have to finish the experiment. Crack them all out and resubmit raw.

    I really do have to do this. I am going to wait a few months before doing so. This really is STUPID and COSTLY.
  • FatManFatMan Posts: 8,977


    << <i>This really is STUPID and COSTLY. >>

    Nah, as you are an MD, I know you understand the value of research.image



    edited: cause I dont write good.image
  • ziggy29ziggy29 Posts: 18,668 ✭✭✭
    Because of the Kool-Aid factor, if even ONE of them crossed, the "costly experiment" probably more than paid for itself.
  • RYKRYK Posts: 35,799 ✭✭✭✭✭
    FatMan, I did not know you were an MD, too. Gotcha! image
  • RYKRYK Posts: 35,799 ✭✭✭✭✭
    IM(very humble)O, the 59-O $10 crossing paid for the rest (and then some).


  • << <i>IM(very humble)O, the 59-O $10 crossing paid for the rest (and then some). >>



    Absolutely! Congratulations!
    www.jaderarecoin.com - Updated 6/8/06. Many new coins added!

    Our eBay auctions - TRUE auctions: start at $0.01, no reserve, 30 day unconditional return privilege & free shipping!
  • ziggy29ziggy29 Posts: 18,668 ✭✭✭


    << <i>Please show me an AU-54 coin.....image >>

    Give the TPGs a little time.
  • MyqqyMyqqy Posts: 9,777
    Not bad in fact pretty darn good, when did you get the results?

    Maybe it's just me with a jaded attitude, but having coins not cross that should cross just seems like a stupid, biased game. You've seen coins of the same quality in pcgs holders, but they do not want to grade yours because they came from ngc plastic??
    image
    My style is impetuous, my defense is impregnable !
  • coinkatcoinkat Posts: 23,825 ✭✭✭✭✭
    they seem to be nice... remember that plastic is just temporary housing and the opinion is not as important as the coin itself... especially with no motto 10 Libs.

    Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.

  • RYKRYK Posts: 35,799 ✭✭✭✭✭
    they seem to be nice... remember that plastic is just temporary housing and the opinion is not as important as the coin itself... especially with no motto 10 Libs.

    Agree, but there are some people I know and many I don't know who will only buy coins in PCGS holders. No one I know will only buy coins in NGC holders.

    Maybe it's just me with a jaded attitude, but having coins not cross that should cross just seems like a stupid, biased game.

    Hence, the stupid (and costly) experiment.
  • BECOKABECOKA Posts: 16,961 ✭✭✭


    << <i>Results are in and are mixed, but not unexpected. image

    The good news is that the most valuable coin in the group (59-O $10) crossed to 45, as did the 57-O $20 (ahem, Reece).

    The 56-O $10 crossed from NGC AU-55 to PCGS AU-53. I allowed the one point drop because I thought the coin might be aggressively graded. In retrospect, the coin is a dead ringer for the 1848-O $10 in PCGS AU-55 that I own.

    The 55-O $10 AU-58, as expected, did not cross.

    The 44-O, 46-O, and 52-O all did not cross. I have seen lesser coins in like grade PCGS holders, and I would guess that if I cracked the coins out and resubmitted them, one or two would cross, maybe all eventually. image >>



    Remember sometimes if there is something questionable and not visible because of the slab it automatically does not cross for the same grade. If it was raw or set to cross at any grade it may have gotten the same grade once seeing it out of the slab.
  • RYKRYK Posts: 35,799 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>Results are in and are mixed, but not unexpected. image

    The good news is that the most valuable coin in the group (59-O $10) crossed to 45, as did the 57-O $20 (ahem, Reece).

    The 56-O $10 crossed from NGC AU-55 to PCGS AU-53. I allowed the one point drop because I thought the coin might be aggressively graded. In retrospect, the coin is a dead ringer for the 1848-O $10 in PCGS AU-55 that I own.

    The 55-O $10 AU-58, as expected, did not cross.

    The 44-O, 46-O, and 52-O all did not cross. I have seen lesser coins in like grade PCGS holders, and I would guess that if I cracked the coins out and resubmitted them, one or two would cross, maybe all eventually. image >>



    Remember sometimes if there is something questionable and not visible because of the slab it automatically does not cross for the same grade. If it was raw or set to cross at any grade it may have gotten the same grade once seeing it out of the slab. >>



    In "A Stupid and Costly Experiment II", I tried another group with "cross at any grade" and most of the coins downgraded. I guess that experiment was stupid and more costly.
  • BECOKABECOKA Posts: 16,961 ✭✭✭
    It might have been costly but maybe not stupid. image

    My OCD would have gone crazy seeing different slabs mixed together. It's worth the cost for me to have everything in one type of slab. Now I just wish PCGS would come out with something better, I'd like to see the edgeview and some kind of label on top added to thier holders.

    I am thinking it will be easier to grade NGC coins in their new slabs now that they have edge view accross the board.
  • DieClashDieClash Posts: 3,688 ✭✭✭
    Holy Time-warp Batman! image
    "Please help us keep these boards professional and informative…. And fun." - DW
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    BONGO HURTLES ALONG THE RAIN SODDEN HIGHWAY OF LIFE ON UNDERINFLATED BALD RETREAD TIRES
  • kazkaz Posts: 9,265 ✭✭✭✭✭
    LOL, it reads like there was no pause in the last 4 years.
  • BECOKABECOKA Posts: 16,961 ✭✭✭


    << <i>LOL, it reads like there was no pause in the last 4 years. >>





    Good posts are always applicable. image
  • TwoSides2aCoinTwoSides2aCoin Posts: 44,574 ✭✭✭✭✭
    You have good taste.
  • etexmikeetexmike Posts: 6,852 ✭✭✭


    << <i>LOL, it reads like there was no pause in the last 4 years. >>



    The scary part is that I actually remember this thread from when it was orginally posted. And yet, I can't remember parts of last week. image


    Mike
  • MikeInFLMikeInFL Posts: 10,188 ✭✭✭✭
    I remember this thread from not long after I joined here, and recall thinking, "What a curious thing to do." Now I can completely understand (I think) the motivation behind the experiment.

    My how your perspective on things changes over time.
    Collector of Large Cents, US Type, and modern pocket change.
  • coinkatcoinkat Posts: 23,825 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I like what I wrote 4 years ago

    Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.

  • You got more guts than we doimage

    image
  • BarryBarry Posts: 10,100 ✭✭✭
    I looked at your first post and thought to myself - gee, RYK needs another hiatus to smarten up some more. Then I noticed the date of the post. My faith is restored in you (assuming you wouldn't play that game these days).

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file