Search
-
Re: Holder bias or major suck-fest?? You decide.
<<Holder bias or major suck-fest?? You decide.>> It appears to me to depend a lot on the topic of the thread. If it's an "Is this AT or NT" thread you are more likely to get a "Body bag it" answer than if the topic is one of the "Look at the purty coin I just bought" type threads where you are likely to get ooo's and ah's. -
Holder bias or major suck-fest?? You decide.

Why would members be so quick to slam this coin which was in a thread by Airplanenut yet seem to accept this coin which was in a thread by Russ? Both appear similar enough as to be deemed AT, or in the least, suspicious. My take is this: one link displays coins which are raw and one link displays coins in a holder… -
Re: Holder bias or major suck-fest?? You decide.
-
Re: Holder bias or major suck-fest?? You decide.
-
Re: Holder bias or major suck-fest?? You decide.
-
Re: Holder bias or major suck-fest?? You decide.
-
Re: Holder bias or major suck-fest?? You decide.
-
Re: Holder bias or major suck-fest?? You decide.
-
Re: Holder bias or major suck-fest?? You decide.
Al You trouble maker you! Everybody knows a coin can only be NT if it has been blessed by PCGS or NGC. And everyone knows that any other toned coin, be it raw or slabbed by other TPGs is AT. I say that half joking, but there is a lot of truth to the statement. Get an AT coin into a PCGS slab and it will rarely be… -
Re: Holder bias or major suck-fest?? You decide.
30 results
