1928 peace dollar guess the grade(((GRADE POSTED)))
indiananationals
Posts: 1,094
sorry pics are not the best
the coin is a 58 for some odd reason it looks much nicer in hand ...i may send to cac and go for a gold bean
the coin is a 58 for some odd reason it looks much nicer in hand ...i may send to cac and go for a gold bean
POSITIVE TRANSACTIONS
gdavis70,Musky1011,cohodk,cucamongacoin,robkool,chumley, drei3ree, Rampage,jmski52, commoncents05, dimples, dcarr, Grouchy, holeinone1972, JonMN34, mission16,meltdown,Omega,PQpeace, SeaEagleCoins, WaterSport, whatsup,Wizard1,WinLoseWin,MMR,49thStateofMind,SamByrd,Ahrensdad,BAJJERFAN,timrutnat,TWQG,CarlWohlforth,Ciccio,PreTurb,NumisMe,Patches,NotSure,luvcoins123,piecesofme,perryhall,nibanny,atarian,airplanenut
gdavis70,Musky1011,cohodk,cucamongacoin,robkool,chumley, drei3ree, Rampage,jmski52, commoncents05, dimples, dcarr, Grouchy, holeinone1972, JonMN34, mission16,meltdown,Omega,PQpeace, SeaEagleCoins, WaterSport, whatsup,Wizard1,WinLoseWin,MMR,49thStateofMind,SamByrd,Ahrensdad,BAJJERFAN,timrutnat,TWQG,CarlWohlforth,Ciccio,PreTurb,NumisMe,Patches,NotSure,luvcoins123,piecesofme,perryhall,nibanny,atarian,airplanenut
0
Comments
Eric
Keeper of the VAM Catalog • Professional Coin Imaging • Prime Number Set • World Coins in Early America • British Trade Dollars • Variety Attribution
-- To my eye I see wear in the hair above lady Liberty's eye and to the right of her ear. The hair to the right is slightly poorly struck, but there are still traces of wear I believe.
-- The eagle's shoulder may have a touch of wear
-- I don't see handling marks in the field interestingly. But the mint luster seems broken.
That's my guess, but I'm still learning.
Jacob
MS63 - weakish stike, noappreciable wear (and clean rims).
If lustrous in hand could be 64.
Questions about Ikes? Go to The IKE GROUP WEB SITE
-Paul
As a buyer: QualityCurrencycom, tychojoe, AurumMiner, Collectorcoins, perfectstrike, ModCrewman, LeeBone, nickel, REALGATOR, MICHAELDIXON, pointfivezero, Walkerguy21D
Trades: georgiacop50
could be what a 58 wants to hear too...
kinda looks improperly rinsed too???
<< <i>63/64
could be what a 58 wants to hear too...
kinda looks improperly rinsed too??? >>
I ws hoping that was not rinse residue. The fuzzy splotch on the Rev I took to be in/on the plastic.
Eric
Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.
I agree, but lean more towards the latter.
My guess is that the pic just doesn`t do the coin any justice.
...Tom
LRC Numismatics eBay listings:
http://stores.ebay.com/lrcnumismatics
Well, just Love coins, period.
luster is a shade weak.
Tom
I think it's a very pretty 58 I would enjoy having in my set.
Lance.
gdavis70,Musky1011,cohodk,cucamongacoin,robkool,chumley, drei3ree, Rampage,jmski52, commoncents05, dimples, dcarr, Grouchy, holeinone1972, JonMN34, mission16,meltdown,Omega,PQpeace, SeaEagleCoins, WaterSport, whatsup,Wizard1,WinLoseWin,MMR,49thStateofMind,SamByrd,Ahrensdad,BAJJERFAN,timrutnat,TWQG,CarlWohlforth,Ciccio,PreTurb,NumisMe,Patches,NotSure,luvcoins123,piecesofme,perryhall,nibanny,atarian,airplanenut
Keeper of the VAM Catalog • Professional Coin Imaging • Prime Number Set • World Coins in Early America • British Trade Dollars • Variety Attribution
<< <i>Stand the coin up on a white piece of paper so that the paper is reflected in the coin and look down at the coin. You will see a gray band at the edge of the bust, and possibly the front tuft of hair, that contrasts with the reflection of the paper in the luster of the rest of the coin. This is why it's 58 even though it may look like a 62-63 at first glance. >>
ah hah...that was the old standard that i've been trying to recall that works with slq's and walkers too
Franklin-Lover's Forum