Options
Ready for the weekend with a "Guess the Grade" coin??? *Grade revealed in last post
dizzyfoxx
Posts: 9,823 ✭✭✭
Let's see what the consensus is on this Vancouver? 
...There's always time for coin collecting. 
0
Comments
ms67 crowd here i am
very-very nice coin
<< <i>could ya make it a lil easier...lol
ms67 crowd here i am
very-very nice coin >>
+1
<< <i>You should make the photos smaller, let's say 700X700. It's very difficult to grade from such large photos. At the very least, the entire coin needs to fit on the page so that you can see all of the obverse or reverse without having to scroll around. >>
Fit's on my page. Still using a 15" tube type monitor? 66+
--Jerry
<< <i>
<< <i>You should make the photos smaller, let's say 700X700. It's very difficult to grade from such large photos. At the very least, the entire coin needs to fit on the page so that you can see all of the obverse or reverse without having to scroll around. >>
Fit's on my page. Still using a 15" tube type monitor? 66+
--Jerry >>
Laptop
Jacob
<< <i>
<< <i>
<< <i>You should make the photos smaller, let's say 700X700. It's very difficult to grade from such large photos. At the very least, the entire coin needs to fit on the page so that you can see all of the obverse or reverse without having to scroll around. >>
Fit's on my page. Still using a 15" tube type monitor? 66+
--Jerry >>
Laptop >>
On my MAC I'm only seeing 1/2 of two man hole covers... I'm gonna guess it's MS62/AU58.
<< <i>For the MS67 crowd here's an actual MS67
Well blow it up to the size of a car tire and lets take a look
<< <i>For the MS67 crowd here's an actual MS67
This is an example of a coin that is most likely technically a 64 (maybe 65), but the awsome toning catapults it to a 67.
<< <i>This is an example of a coin that is most likely technically a 64 (maybe 65), but the awsome toning catapults it to a 67. >>
Dizzy a bit early to be drinking
<< <i>Well blow it up to the size of a car tire and lets take a look
Here's ya go Lotsoluck... Some Tires
MS67
MS66
MS65
<< <i>
<< <i>Well blow it up to the size of a car tire and lets take a look
Here's ya go Lotsoluck...
Better pics. Definitely 65 technically at best with 67 star power color.
<< <i>Better pics. Definitely 65 technically at best with 67 star power color. >>
Dizzy you must be smoking the good stuff today!!!
Take a good look at the reverse it's flawless... Whereas your frontiersman looks like he was involved in a drive-by shooting
<< <i>
<< <i>Better pics. Definitely 65 technically at best with 67 star power color. >>
Dizzy you must be smoking the good stuff today!!!
Take a good look at the reverse it's flawless... Whereas your frontiersman looks like he was involved in a drive-by shooting
The reverse on the "67" may appear to be flawless but it's as smooth as a baby's back side.
Compare the Vancouver that I posted, to the 67 with great toning. The strike on the 67 is far softer in many respects to the OP coin. For example: On the obverse - The definition of the hair and cheekbones as well as the shirt collar. Even more evident on the reverse - with the definition of the frontiersman's beard, face, and coon hat as well as the musculature in his legs and the fort in the background. The difference in the quality of the two strikes is tremendous. The miniscule ticks seem to be about the same.
PCGS Registries
Box of 20
SeaEagleCoins: 11/14/54-4/5/12. Miss you Larry!
As a buyer: QualityCurrencycom, tychojoe, AurumMiner, Collectorcoins, perfectstrike, ModCrewman, LeeBone, nickel, REALGATOR, MICHAELDIXON, pointfivezero, Walkerguy21D
Trades: georgiacop50
<< <i>
<< <i>This is an example of a coin that is most likely technically a 64 (maybe 65), but the awsome toning catapults it to a 67. >>
Dizzy a bit early to be drinking
Hey Broadstruck, my friend, I was dead sober at the time of my assessment of the Vancouvers. Now that it's after 5 pm, I am now