Anyone? I know the pictures are tough but this wouldnt be any fun if they were good. If you zoom in there is potential. The High D and the die chip to the right of the end ray.
Does anyone else feel that the pickups on this VAM are significant enough to garner some more popularity? The different mint mark alone to me is substaitial.
Comments
could the images be any smaller?
.
<< <i>Pretty sure the VAM 4 is the only one for the date worth any money and the 3 & 4 are the only two top 50s >>
the 5a is listed in the top rarities of 1934 d peace vams
it is not listed in the recent price guide but price/value is not always the reason to collect
wonder what the top pop is?
i'm too lazy to go look right now
.
Keeper of the VAM Catalog • Professional Coin Imaging • Prime Number Set • World Coins in Early America • British Trade Dollars • Variety Attribution
<< <i>It looks like it is a VAM 5A from here. >>
I hope youre(were) right because I bought it off the first set of pics thinking thats what it was. Thanks messydesk.
<< <i>
<< <i>Pretty sure the VAM 4 is the only one for the date worth any money and the 3 & 4 are the only two top 50s >>
the 5a is listed in the top rarities of 1934 d peace vams
it is not listed in the recent price guide but price/value is not always the reason to collect
wonder what the top pop is?
i'm too lazy to go look right now
. >>
If you get a surge of energy I would appreciate the pop info greatly
looked like the dot obverse from the small images, just didn't want you thinking we had magic powers making us work with small images ;-)
the pop reports may be obscured by the fact ngc/pcgs attribute very few of the 3700 vams
.
that leaves, anacs, segs, icg maybe
.
anacs 2
cac - didn't see any
pcgs - zero - probably don't attribute
ngc - zero - probably don't attribute
.
the fact so many silver dollars have been cleaned also obscures populations
.