Actually he was born on February 11, 1732, The calender was changed in 1752 with the implementation of the Gregorian calender. this moved his birthday to February 22.
I don't think the image on that token is Washington. It is likely the Duke of Wellington.
<< <i>Actually he was born on February 11, 1732, The calender was changed in 1752 with the implementation of the Gregorian calender. this moved his birthday to February 22.
I don't think the image on that token is Washington. It is likely the Duke of Wellington.
Eagle Eye,
From what I understand the portrait is patterned after the Roman style Ceasers, complete with Toga. The die maker was making an idylic statement that Washington was elevated to a Monarch or some such idea. Which Washington himself refused to have a part of. The original Mint Dies (1783) are now at the Smithsonian.
NumbersUsa, FairUs, Alipac, CapsWeb, and TeamAmericaPac
Comments
Steve
Of course, I was kinda distracted Monday by my partying down for Franklin Pierce...
Here's a warning parable for coin collectors...
I don't think the image on that token is Washington. It is likely the Duke of Wellington.
Here's my favorite Washington medal.
<< <i>Actually he was born on February 11, 1732, The calender was changed in 1752 with the implementation of the Gregorian calender. this moved his birthday to February 22.
I don't think the image on that token is Washington. It is likely the Duke of Wellington.
Eagle Eye,
From what I understand the portrait is patterned after the Roman style Ceasers, complete with Toga. The die maker was making an idylic statement that Washington was elevated
to a Monarch or some such idea. Which Washington himself refused to have a part of. The original Mint Dies (1783) are now at the Smithsonian.