Home U.S. Coin Forum
Options

1819 25C Opinions/Grades? Re-punched '5'?

taxmadtaxmad Posts: 1,194 ✭✭✭✭
Might be difficult to tell - this is the first one I have owned so I have no idea how they look. It has some old scratches I have tried to capture in the pictures. It also has a re-punched '5' and looks like an extra '.' above the '.' after the '5' Is this worth submitting?


imageimage

imageimage

Comments

  • Options
    hchcoinhchcoin Posts: 4,843 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Looks like a B-3 R-1 from the pictures. This is the most common die marriage for 1819.
  • This content has been removed.
  • Options
    "Is it worth submitting?" I guess that is a decision you will have to make. It's fairly common and low grade. The repunched 5 is is cool, but not rare. I would just find one already in a PCGS holder. Unless your going to send a batch of coins in anyway I would just keep it as is.
    Winner of the "You Suck!" award March 17, 2010 by LanLord, doh, 123cents and Bear.
  • Options
    LanceNewmanOCCLanceNewmanOCC Posts: 19,999 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Why the moon landing landscape shot of the reverse, makes it tough to grade or attribute, although the previous member seemed to have no trouble! >>



    image

    <--- look what's behind the mask! - cool link 1/NO ~ 2/NNP ~ 3/NNC ~ 4/CF ~ 5/PG ~ 6/Cert ~ 7/NGC 7a/NGC pop~ 8/NGCF ~ 9/HA archives ~ 10/PM ~ 11/NM ~ 12/ANACS cert ~ 13/ANACS pop - report fakes 1/ACEF ~ report fakes/thefts 1/NCIS - Numi-Classes SS ~ Bass ~ Transcribed Docs NNP - clashed coins - error training - V V mm styles -

  • Options
    taxmadtaxmad Posts: 1,194 ✭✭✭✭
    I couldn't get a decent shot on the 25 C and the rest. Honestly I was more concerned about the scratches on the neck and if that would keep it from getting a grade. I will try to take a better picture - my 'good' camera died and I am using a 'Free Camera with new checking account' camera...

    image

    I want to put this in my type set - the seller believes it would grade and be worth a bunch. I thought $125 was in the ballpark - guessing it is F-10. I don't deal in coins - so I was guessing (and using the Red Book as a guide). This is my second go at a type set and bought several whizzed, cleaned, dipped etc. coins the first go around. Hope the new pic helps...
  • Options
    taxmadtaxmad Posts: 1,194 ✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Why the moon landing landscape shot of the reverse, makes it tough to grade or attribute, although the previous member seemed to have no trouble! >>



    After reading these threads over the last year I have decided I could give a brief of description and a pic of the rim and have someone give me the die marriage, rarity and the last time a similar one sold at Heritage. It is the only reason I have decided to try the type set again...
  • Options
    Billet7Billet7 Posts: 4,923 ✭✭✭
    Are those scratches on the obverse? If they are, no grade. If not, it may certify, but no guarantees. The toning is strange.

    Repunched 5 is VERY normal...if that can even exist...I guess if something is normal...it can't really be VERY normal. Either it's normal or it's not. I guess it's like saying very unique, but you get the point.

  • Options
    IrishMikeyIrishMikey Posts: 1,561 ✭✭✭
    Agree, the scratches will keep it from being graded at PCGS. Still not a bad looking bust quarter.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file