1876-S- SEATED .25...GTG

Frankiefanatic · December 17, 2011 12:49AM

and if you care please comment on my photo taking skills- tis my newly(used) purchased Nikon D5000 with a standard 18-55mm lens.

I'll post the grade later in the day...

Billet7 · December 17, 2011 1:20AM

Gennie for ED?

If not, it's a 53.

DoubleEagle59 · December 17, 2011 2:36AM

au55

SamByrd · December 17, 2011 2:41AM

looked at the last image I can see far better the surfaces of the obverse. AU50 is my revised guess

Frankiefanatic · December 17, 2011 5:50AM

<< <i>Gennie for ED?

If not, it's a 53. >>

Erectile Dysfunction!! never

Frankiefanatic · December 17, 2011 11:03AM

what nobody likes Seated stuff anymore?

I realize its not Modern Crap but it is history still kickin..

where were you (or for that matter your GGreatgrand parents) in 1876?

c'mon night crew- give yer thoughts...

DIMEMAN · December 17, 2011 11:13AM

I like it and will guess 55.

coindeuce · December 17, 2011 2:43PM

I have an extensive collection of certified centennial silver type coins. This coin would not ever fit in my set. The toning is just too fugly. AU-53.

astrorat · December 17, 2011 2:44PM

AU-55

DennisH · December 17, 2011 3:31PM

AU55.

Decent shot for a non-macro lens. Workable for show & tell purposes and plenty good enough for eBay. But the sharpness is less than with a macro.

MilkmanDan · December 17, 2011 4:59PM

Based on the 2nd to last image, doesn't it have more like XF45 wear? I'm no expert.

Frankiefanatic · December 17, 2011 10:28PM

Well based on the responses, there are a few here that are spot on with grading from a photo- congrats.

I noticed that some are not happy with the color presentation- which I'm ok with considering that it's in my collection, but the coin in hand is pretty dazzling when swirled in natural light, maybe next time I'll do it as a mini movie to show off the colors. Anyway your result is:

1876-S- SEATED .25...GTG

Comments

Leave a Comment