Options
an example of why I'd like to see + grades for low circs.
It's amazing what gets into holders at the low end of the grading scale, and I think this comparison illustrates disturbingly why the recent + attribution approach should be applied to much lower grades than it is currently.
This is a PCGS Good-06 that I posted in another thread about a week ago:

This is an ANACS VG-08 in an upcoming Teletrade auction (no, it's not in a "details" holder):

This is a PCGS Good-06 in an upcoming Teletrade auction:
This is a PCGS Good-06 that I posted in another thread about a week ago:

This is an ANACS VG-08 in an upcoming Teletrade auction (no, it's not in a "details" holder):

This is a PCGS Good-06 in an upcoming Teletrade auction:
When in doubt, don't.
0
Comments
And I am not writing that because I was one of the people that thought VG8 was reasonable- especially because of the rims.
Pictures connect all the dots... well done
Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.
Keeper of the VAM Catalog • Professional Coin Imaging • Prime Number Set • World Coins in Early America • British Trade Dollars • Variety Attribution
For example, if a G-4 is a $400 coin, and a VG-8 is an $800 coin, then you'd expect a "6" to be a $600 coin.
You can use the lower grade pricing structure to do some dead reckoning like that.
But here's the problem...the difference between G4 and G6 is a 50% jump! Every single little tiny point is a huge leap percentage-wise.
Steve
Check out this 1897-o 25c on Teletrade.
While your at TT page, click on the linky thing that shows past auctions of the same date. The examples provided are graded VF20 but look pretty much like the Fine 15.
So the F15 example is clearly deserving of a plus grade.