Is this for real?? Warning: eBay post

DieClash · June 27, 2011 5:06AM

Link

crypto79 · June 27, 2011 5:16AM

I think it is. The seller knows their stuff and the rims don't look like the rims of a coin with Good details. Cool coin that was mishandled in the most collected series says 799$ is a fair if not somewhat unrealistic asking price

rainbowroosie · June 27, 2011 7:54AM

I'd like it more in a holder that states what it is...

Rampage · June 27, 2011 7:59AM

It does not look like a die adjustment strike to me.

19Lyds · June 27, 2011 8:11AM

I don;t believe it's a die adjustment strike anymore than I believe that these three are.

Both top coins are filled die error's while the bottom coin is just a lowly AU55.

AUandAG · June 27, 2011 8:15AM

Nothing unusual about that wear pattern on either the front or back. I don't agree with the seller.

bob

johnny9434 · June 28, 2011 3:46AM

and the shipping is very reasonable as well ( not )

cmerlo1 · June 28, 2011 4:42AM

I'd be a little miffed if I'd ponied up $50 for mint error certification, and it wasn't on the holder, even if the coin had problems. Perhaps PCGS disagreed that it was a die adjustment strike?

derryb · June 28, 2011 5:08AM

disagree with seller, agree with pcgs label

FredWeinberg · June 28, 2011 5:14AM

It's not a Die Adjustment Strike,
or a Set Up Strike, or anything similar.

From what I can see, it's either a very
weak strike on the obv. (can't tell from
the slightly blurry rev., but it's probably
a filled die obv. at best.

In any case, it's not worth $200, much
less $800, imo.

FredWeinberg · June 28, 2011 5:16AM

Ya know, I looked at the enlargements,
and I'm fairly certain it's a worn, typical
weak strike 21......nothing special at all.

DieClash · June 28, 2011 5:18AM

<< <i>Ya know, I looked at the enlargements,
and I'm fairly certain it's a worn, typical
weak strike 21......nothing special at all. >>

Thanks Fred!

Cheers!

Kirk

Is this for real?? Warning: eBay post

Comments

Leave a Comment