Actually, no. He said he sent you an email. The fact you didn't get it (or at least claimed so) is not proof he was ignoring you. >>
You asked how I KNEW he got my PM's...... the fact that he referred to my PM's in his post proves he got my PM's The proof that he ignored me is based on the fact that he also said that he didn't feel the need to respond to my PM's! I think I see how you came up with your "name" on this forum!
What we've got here is failure to communicate.....
<< <i>You asked how I KNEW he got my PM's...... the fact that he referred to my PM's in his post proves he got my PM's >>
You didn't know this when you came here to complain. Well, it was actually a passive-aggressive complaint disguised as a "What would you do?" post, but still...
<< <i>The proof that he ignored me is based on the fact that he also said that he didn't feel the need to respond to my PM's! >>
Why should he feel the need, if he already sent an email response to you? In his own words: "How many different times and ways do I need to contact a buyer?"
<< <i>I think I see how you came up with your "name" on this forum! >>
When it comes to someone making fun of another's user id, it generally means that someone doesn't really have much of an argument to begin with.
BTW... if you didn't trust him enough to follow through on the transaction, why did you agree to it in the first place?
<< <i>You asked how I KNEW he got my PM's...... the fact that he referred to my PM's in his post proves he got my PM's >>
You didn't know this when you came here to complain. Well, it was actually a passive-aggressive complaint disguised as a "What would you do?" post, but still...
<< <i>The proof that he ignored me is based on the fact that he also said that he didn't feel the need to respond to my PM's! >>
Why should he feel the need, if he already sent an email response to you? In his own words: "How many different times and ways do I need to contact a buyer?"
<< <i>I think I see how you came up with your "name" on this forum! >>
When it comes to someone making fun of another's user id, it generally means that someone doesn't really have much of an argument to begin with.
BTW... if you didn't trust him enough to follow through on the transaction, why did you agree to it in the first place? >>
Apparently, you are just trying to stir the pot. Your posts add nothing to this thread. If I didn't trust him to some degree I would never have sent him money. Trust was never an issue, communication was! I "gifted" him the money. That does not indicate a lack of trust. I don't post on these threads to argue. As I stated earlier, he could have taken 3-4 weeks to ship the coin, as long as he let me know I would have been fine with that. Please add something positive to the thread, being combative helps no one.
What we've got here is failure to communicate.....
<< <i>Apparently, you are just trying to stir the pot. Your posts add nothing to this thread. >>
And yet, you respond. It's magic!
<< <i>If I didn't trust him to some degree I would never have sent him money. Trust was never an issue, communication was! I "gifted" him the money. >>
You didn't gift him anything. You sent money in exchange for a coin.
<< <i>That does not indicate a lack of trust. >>
No, but this thread does.
<< <i>I don't post on these threads to argue. >>
Really?
<< <i>As I stated earlier, he could have taken 3-4 weeks to ship the coin, as long as he let me know I would have been fine with that. >>
He did let you know- again, in his own words: "He sent me an email and I responded within an hour." Seems pretty responsive to me.
<< <i>Please add something positive to the thread, being combative helps no one. >>
You mean like saying "Yes, you're right- the seller is an inconsiderate jerk"? Is that positive enough for you?
<< <i>Apparently, you are just trying to stir the pot. Your posts add nothing to this thread. >>
And yet, you respond. It's magic!
<< <i>If I didn't trust him to some degree I would never have sent him money. Trust was never an issue, communication was! I "gifted" him the money. >>
You didn't gift him anything. You sent money in exchange for a coin.
<< <i>That does not indicate a lack of trust. >>
No, but this thread does.
<< <i>I don't post on these threads to argue. >>
Really?
<< <i>As I stated earlier, he could have taken 3-4 weeks to ship the coin, as long as he let me know I would have been fine with that. >>
He did let you know- again, in his own words: "He sent me an email and I responded within an hour." Seems pretty responsive to me.
<< <i>Please add something positive to the thread, being combative helps no one. >>
You mean like saying "Yes, you're right- the seller is an inconsiderate jerk"? Is that positive enough for you? >>
To help you understand, the term "gifted" refers to paying the seller via the "gift" option on Paypal. That apparently saves the recipient fees on the transaction. The sender of the "gift" has little to no recourse in the event the transaction goes south. That implies alot of trust! FWIW I did not attack the seller personally. I can tell that you like to have the "last word" so have at it. This will be my final reply to you in this thread, as it is obviously not productive. Hopefully, you have learned what the phrase "gifted" refers to!
So all was not lost!
What we've got here is failure to communicate.....
<< <i>To help you understand, the term "gifted" refers to paying the seller via the "gift" option on Paypal. That apparently saves the recipient fees on the transaction. The sender of the "gift" has little to no recourse in the event the transaction goes south. That implies alot of trust! >>
<< <i>...pay for something that you win on the BST board, or any auction site? Then, what are your expectations for shipment of your winnings?
In any venue I pay immediately. Then I expect the seller to ship within 24-48 hours. If they take longer I would expect an e-mail stating such. I don't feel like my expectations are unreasonable. Just curious if I am in the minority here or if most people expect the same. My most recent BST deal was paid for literally withnin MINUTES of an agreed upon transaction. The seller still has not confirmed to me that the item has been shipped, despite emails requesting such info., and as the mail delivery today, no coin! >>
I pay as soon as possible. I don't need to here from the seller after that. If the coin has not made it in 10 to 12 days, I'll contact the seller. To me it's not worth all the worry over a few days.
BankerBob - honestly, how was I supposed to know that you didn't get my email You sent me an email, and I responded. I didn't hear anything from you again for several days, I thought the issue was settled. Do you remember sending the email? If you had gotten the response, would that have satisfied you? Check your spam or garbage folders, see if my response is sitting there waiting for you, unread.
<< <i>BankerBob - honestly, how was I supposed to know that you didn't get my email You sent me an email, and I responded. I didn't hear anything from you again for several days, I thought the issue was settled. Do you remember sending the email? If you had gotten the response, would that have satisfied you? Check your spam or garbage folders, see if my response is sitting there waiting for you, unread. >>
JP I do remember sending the email. Yes, absolutely - had I seen your response I wouldn't have had a worry in the world. When I did not "see" any response I PM'd you a couple of times. Once, asking for shipping info and another asking about the 34-D in another auction. I commented on your surname as well. Did you get any of those? I will check my spam filter when I return from a wonderful seminar with the FDIC and Sheila Bair. I APOLOGIZE PUBLICLY to you for my part in any misunderstanding and/or miscommunication. The fact that you have responded to this entire issue indicates you are a stand up guy, and therefore, alleviates my initial concerns. I'll let you know later this week when I have the chance to review my e-mail, and actually receive the coin!
What we've got here is failure to communicate.....
Comments
<< <i>
<< <i>He just stated so in his previous post!
So you knew he received your PM and just assumed he was ignoring you? >>
I was proven right though wasn't I!!!
Successful BST xactions w/PCcoins, Drunner, Manofcoins, Rampage, docg, Poppee, RobKool, and MichealDixon.
<< <i>I was proven right though wasn't I!!!
Actually, no. He said he sent you an email. The fact you didn't get it (or at least claimed so) is not proof he was ignoring you.
<< <i>
<< <i>I was proven right though wasn't I!!!
Actually, no. He said he sent you an email. The fact you didn't get it (or at least claimed so) is not proof he was ignoring you. >>
You asked how I KNEW he got my PM's...... the fact that he referred to my PM's in his post proves he got my PM's The proof that he ignored me is based on the fact that he also said that he didn't feel the need to respond to my PM's! I think I see how you came up with your "name" on this forum!
Successful BST xactions w/PCcoins, Drunner, Manofcoins, Rampage, docg, Poppee, RobKool, and MichealDixon.
<< <i>You asked how I KNEW he got my PM's...... the fact that he referred to my PM's in his post proves he got my PM's >>
You didn't know this when you came here to complain. Well, it was actually a passive-aggressive complaint disguised as a "What would you do?" post, but still...
<< <i>The proof that he ignored me is based on the fact that he also said that he didn't feel the need to respond to my PM's! >>
Why should he feel the need, if he already sent an email response to you? In his own words: "How many different times and ways do I need to contact a buyer?"
<< <i>I think I see how you came up with your "name" on this forum!
When it comes to someone making fun of another's user id, it generally means that someone doesn't really have much of an argument to begin with.
BTW... if you didn't trust him enough to follow through on the transaction, why did you agree to it in the first place?
<< <i>
<< <i>You asked how I KNEW he got my PM's...... the fact that he referred to my PM's in his post proves he got my PM's >>
You didn't know this when you came here to complain. Well, it was actually a passive-aggressive complaint disguised as a "What would you do?" post, but still...
<< <i>The proof that he ignored me is based on the fact that he also said that he didn't feel the need to respond to my PM's! >>
Why should he feel the need, if he already sent an email response to you? In his own words: "How many different times and ways do I need to contact a buyer?"
<< <i>I think I see how you came up with your "name" on this forum!
When it comes to someone making fun of another's user id, it generally means that someone doesn't really have much of an argument to begin with.
BTW... if you didn't trust him enough to follow through on the transaction, why did you agree to it in the first place? >>
Apparently, you are just trying to stir the pot. Your posts add nothing to this thread. If I didn't trust him to some degree I would never have sent him money. Trust was never an issue, communication was! I "gifted" him the money. That does not indicate a lack of trust. I don't post on these threads to argue. As I stated earlier, he could have taken 3-4 weeks to ship the coin, as long as he let me know I would have been fine with that. Please add something positive to the thread, being combative helps no one.
Successful BST xactions w/PCcoins, Drunner, Manofcoins, Rampage, docg, Poppee, RobKool, and MichealDixon.
<< <i>Apparently, you are just trying to stir the pot. Your posts add nothing to this thread. >>
And yet, you respond. It's magic!
<< <i>If I didn't trust him to some degree I would never have sent him money. Trust was never an issue, communication was! I "gifted" him the money. >>
You didn't gift him anything. You sent money in exchange for a coin.
<< <i>That does not indicate a lack of trust. >>
No, but this thread does.
<< <i>I don't post on these threads to argue. >>
Really?
<< <i>As I stated earlier, he could have taken 3-4 weeks to ship the coin, as long as he let me know I would have been fine with that. >>
He did let you know- again, in his own words: "He sent me an email and I responded within an hour." Seems pretty responsive to me.
<< <i>Please add something positive to the thread, being combative helps no one. >>
You mean like saying "Yes, you're right- the seller is an inconsiderate jerk"? Is that positive enough for you?
<< <i>
<< <i>Apparently, you are just trying to stir the pot. Your posts add nothing to this thread. >>
And yet, you respond. It's magic!
<< <i>If I didn't trust him to some degree I would never have sent him money. Trust was never an issue, communication was! I "gifted" him the money. >>
You didn't gift him anything. You sent money in exchange for a coin.
<< <i>That does not indicate a lack of trust. >>
No, but this thread does.
<< <i>I don't post on these threads to argue. >>
Really?
<< <i>As I stated earlier, he could have taken 3-4 weeks to ship the coin, as long as he let me know I would have been fine with that. >>
He did let you know- again, in his own words: "He sent me an email and I responded within an hour." Seems pretty responsive to me.
<< <i>Please add something positive to the thread, being combative helps no one. >>
You mean like saying "Yes, you're right- the seller is an inconsiderate jerk"? Is that positive enough for you?
To help you understand, the term "gifted" refers to paying the seller via the "gift" option on Paypal. That apparently saves the recipient fees on the transaction. The sender of the "gift" has little to no recourse in the event the transaction goes south. That implies alot of trust! FWIW I did not attack the seller personally. I can tell that you like to have the "last word" so have at it. This will be my final reply to you in this thread, as it is obviously not productive. Hopefully, you have learned what the phrase "gifted" refers to!
So all was not lost!
Successful BST xactions w/PCcoins, Drunner, Manofcoins, Rampage, docg, Poppee, RobKool, and MichealDixon.
<< <i>To help you understand, the term "gifted" refers to paying the seller via the "gift" option on Paypal. That apparently saves the recipient fees on the transaction. The sender of the "gift" has little to no recourse in the event the transaction goes south. That implies alot of trust! >>
Not enough, apparently.
<< <i>...pay for something that you win on the BST board, or any auction site? Then, what are your expectations for shipment of your winnings?
In any venue I pay immediately. Then I expect the seller to ship within 24-48 hours. If they take longer I would expect an e-mail stating such. I don't feel like my expectations are unreasonable. Just curious if I am in the minority here or if most people expect the same. My most recent BST deal was paid for literally withnin MINUTES of an agreed upon transaction. The seller still has not confirmed to me that the item has been shipped, despite emails requesting such info., and as the mail delivery today, no coin!
I pay as soon as possible. I don't need to here from the seller after that. If the coin has not made it in 10 to 12 days, I'll contact the seller. To me it's not worth all the worry over a few days.
<< <i>BankerBob - honestly, how was I supposed to know that you didn't get my email You sent me an email, and I responded. I didn't hear anything from you again for several days, I thought the issue was settled. Do you remember sending the email? If you had gotten the response, would that have satisfied you? Check your spam or garbage folders, see if my response is sitting there waiting for you, unread. >>
JP I do remember sending the email. Yes, absolutely - had I seen your response I wouldn't have had a worry in the world. When I did not "see" any response I PM'd you a couple of times. Once, asking for shipping info and another asking about the 34-D in another auction. I commented on your surname as well. Did you get any of those? I will check my spam filter when I return from a wonderful seminar with the FDIC and Sheila Bair. I APOLOGIZE PUBLICLY to you for my part in any misunderstanding and/or miscommunication. The fact that you have responded to this entire issue indicates you are a stand up guy, and therefore, alleviates my initial concerns. I'll let you know later this week when I have the chance to review my e-mail, and actually receive the coin!
Successful BST xactions w/PCcoins, Drunner, Manofcoins, Rampage, docg, Poppee, RobKool, and MichealDixon.
On an unrelated note, I thought Sheila Bair had left the FDIC?
<< <i>Looking back at my PMs, I do see the ones you mentioned. I must have overlooked them. Again, sorry for any confusion or misunderstanding.
On an unrelated note, I thought Sheila Bair had left the FDIC? >>
Her term is up in early July.... but I am sure she will make "cameo" appearances on occasion. Much like Bill Seidman used to....
Successful BST xactions w/PCcoins, Drunner, Manofcoins, Rampage, docg, Poppee, RobKool, and MichealDixon.
<< <i>Are we not men? This is beginning to sound like "The View". Group hug, anyone? >>
Successful BST xactions w/PCcoins, Drunner, Manofcoins, Rampage, docg, Poppee, RobKool, and MichealDixon.