Shill alert?
thisnamztaken
Posts: 4,101 ✭✭✭✭✭
I think I'll pass on this
The seller has a total of two feed back. One of those is private and the other is for a $3.58 item.
Twenty-five of the twenty-nine bids on this expensive coin are from someone (shill?) with 0 feedback!
Whats wrong with this picture, or am I being too suspicious?
The seller has a total of two feed back. One of those is private and the other is for a $3.58 item.
Twenty-five of the twenty-nine bids on this expensive coin are from someone (shill?) with 0 feedback!
Whats wrong with this picture, or am I being too suspicious?
I never thought that growing old would happen so fast.
- Jim
- Jim
0
Comments
I think bidder i**e (0) placed multiple bids to try to beat a previous bidder, t**n (44).
None of the bidders has a majority of their bids with this seller, so doesn't look like a shill, at least at a distance.
As far as the seller, who knows............
......I collect old stuff......
<< <i>I think bidder i**e (0) placed multiple bids to try to beat a previous bidder, t**n (44). >>
I thought about that too. You may be right. The whole thing just doesn't look or feel right to me in my gut.
- Jim
Pick you price and set your snipe.
Positive BST Transactions (buyers and sellers): wondercoin, blu62vette, BAJJERFAN, privatecoin, blu62vette, AlanLastufka, privatecoin
#1 1951 Bowman Los Angeles Rams Team Set
#2 1980 Topps Los Angeles Rams Team Set
#8 (and climbing) 1972 Topps Los Angeles Rams Team Set
<< <i>VF DETAILS. No mention of the what the problem is that gave it a details grade even though it would be right on the holder. Forget about Shill bidders as so much as not getting full disclosure. >>
It says plugged on the holder.
<< <i>
<< <i>VF DETAILS. No mention of the what the problem is that gave it a details grade even though it would be right on the holder. Forget about Shill bidders as so much as not getting full disclosure. >>
It says plugged on the holder. >>
From reading posts here, I have learned that if a seller doesn't include all relevant information in the description, he's being dishonest. And if he does, but doesn't include a picture illustrating that, he's being dishonest. Best I can tell, buyers want to be able to bid on auctions without reading the descriptions but they want all the information included in the descriptions anyway. Or something like that.
<< <i>Twenty-five of the twenty-nine bids on this expensive coin are from someone (shill?) with 0 feedback! >>
That 0 feedback bidder has bid on 15 items with 11 different sellers... he/she has placed 144 bids on those 15 items! I don't think they've grasped the eBay thing yet!