Some questions about the Silver Proof Ike Dollars, 1971-1974.

I have some nicely toned Silver Eisenhower Dollars, the Brown Box Proofs that were released in the GSA-like holders. As many know they weren't very stable and often toned in soft blue tones and nice target/bullseye shades of all colors. I have a few that I'm considering for encapsulation in order to complete a PCGS graded set. Certainly leaving them in the holders is an option, but that's not what the thread is about.
I hoped to get some advice about how/what to do and what others have had success with. Here's what I figure I can do:
Option #1 is to crack the coins out and send them to PCGS. However, there is the chance they won't grade them. If that happens it's a bad thing, I don't have a PCGS encapsulated coin or one in the original holder.
Option #2 is to send the coins in the holder to NGC where they'll grade them intact. Then I could send them to PCGS for a crossover.
Has anyone sent these kinds of coins to PCGS raw?? Were they graded or returned in a BB/Genuine holder?? What about crossovers in the NGC graded shells?? Thanks in advance.
Al H.

Option #1 is to crack the coins out and send them to PCGS. However, there is the chance they won't grade them. If that happens it's a bad thing, I don't have a PCGS encapsulated coin or one in the original holder.
Option #2 is to send the coins in the holder to NGC where they'll grade them intact. Then I could send them to PCGS for a crossover.
Has anyone sent these kinds of coins to PCGS raw?? Were they graded or returned in a BB/Genuine holder?? What about crossovers in the NGC graded shells?? Thanks in advance.
Al H.
0
Comments
Send them to PCGS in the original government holders to PCGS for grading. That way they can see that the coin toned inside of the holder. Let PCGS crack them out if they make your minimum grade.
Just a thought
<< <i>would the graders know they had come intact?? >>
I think that's a valid question Keets. However, don't you think that type of toning is common enough on the Ikes that they'd recognize it regardless?
Coin's for sale/trade.
Tom Pilitowski
US Rare Coin Investments
800-624-1870
Coin's for sale/trade.
Tom Pilitowski
US Rare Coin Investments
800-624-1870
<< <i>would the graders know they had come intact?? >>
ask DW
All the above were submitted without the government cases.
The name is LEE!
<< <i>the 69DCAM award isn't what i'm after. >>
Be sure to share your result then cause I'm interested in what your submitting now.
Care to post some pre-submission photo's?
The name is LEE!
<< <i>However, do not expect any PR69DCAMs on Toned IKE Proofs. >>
Sorry to ask the obvious but was that a tongue in cheek comment Lee? Or did you gas those in the slab?
<< <i>
<< <i>However, do not expect any PR69DCAMs on Toned IKE Proofs. >>
Sorry to ask the obvious but was that a tongue in cheek comment Lee? Or did you gas those in the slab?
No it wasn't a "tongue and cheek" comment. Toning has a tendency to mask certain surface flaws which would prevent the PR69 grade. A lack of mirrors can prevent a DCAM designation.
And I don't particularly care for your implying that I gas slabs. If you'd ever spent anytime looking at enough Silver Proof IKE dollars, you'd know that what I stated and showed are all accurate representations of what can happen to these coins.
Browns, Blues and Greens are all quite common on 71-S, 72-S, and 73-S. 74-S's have a tendency toward target toning in hue's of Blue and Lavendar. More than likely, all due to whatever rinsing agent was used prior to the planchets being minted.
Now take it back.
The name is LEE!
<< <i>And I don't particularly care for your implying that I gas slabs. If you'd ever spent anytime looking at enough Silver Proof IKE dollars, you'd know that what I stated and showed are all accurate representations of what can happen to these coins. >>
Major FAIL on me.
I do SINCERELY apologize that my comment was taken as a serious jab at your integrity. That comment itself was intended to be "tongue in cheek". In actuality, I failed to fully review the slabs you showed, noting only the DCAM designation; not the fact that they'd not attained the numeric grade you had referenced. Accordingly, I interpreted your post as saying "Don't you expect 69DCAM's, but look at all mine." which was the source of my confusion and was clearly not your intent. I DO recognize your expertise in the Ike Dollar field...which is why I seriously asked for the clarification.
Now..how do we not have a "Sorry" smiley?
Edit - and unless anyone is confused...I DO take it back.
<< <i>
<< <i>And I don't particularly care for your implying that I gas slabs. If you'd ever spent anytime looking at enough Silver Proof IKE dollars, you'd know that what I stated and showed are all accurate representations of what can happen to these coins. >>
Major FAIL on me.
I do SINCERELY apologize that my comment was taken as a serious jab at your integrity. That comment itself was intended to be "tongue in cheek". In actuality, I failed to fully review the slabs you showed, noting only the DCAM designation; not the fact that they'd not attained the numeric grade you had referenced. Accordingly, I interpreted your post as saying "Don't you expect 69DCAM's, but look at all mine." which was the source of my confusion and was clearly not your intent. I DO recognize your expertise in the Ike Dollar field...which is why I seriously asked for the clarification.
Now..how do we not have a "Sorry" smiley?
Edit - and unless anyone is confused...I DO take it back. >>
Apology accepted.
The name is LEE!
Edited to add, this was my image
.
CoinsAreFun Toned Silver Eagle Proof Album
.
Gallery Mint Museum, Ron Landis& Joe Rust, The beginnings of the Golden Dollar
.
More CoinsAreFun Pictorials NGC
<< <i>I just cracked mine out and sent it in.
Edited to add, this was my image
Sugar magnolia blossoms blooming, heads all empty and I don't care ...