Ouch!! One for PCGS to Buy Back?

1914S PCGS 64RD Lincoln
Just can't imagine this is what it looked like when it was graded. Either way it looks to me like this coin needs to be snatched out of the market and buried!
Just can't imagine this is what it looked like when it was graded. Either way it looks to me like this coin needs to be snatched out of the market and buried!
I'd like my copper well done please!
0
Comments
Michael Kittle Rare Coins --- 1908-S Indian Head Cent Grading Set --- No. 1 1909 Mint Set --- Kittlecoins on Facebook --- Long Beach Table 448
<< <i>Got you back Larissa
Careful... Larissa is my 11-year-old daughter!
rainbowroosie April 1, 2003
<< <i>OK LLafoe. I still got ya back! >>
It's not a biggee... btw, I'm Larry.
I'm just amazed that Heritage, Teletrade, Stacks, Bowers, etc., don't/wouldn't screen the lots they accept to auction. If I were an auctioneer, I'd be aware of my reputation... but since I'm not, I don't care about my reputation!
<< <i>Nearly Gem. Red. Well struck. Pleasing surfaces. Toned
Teletrade should be more careful with those "canned" descriptions or at least get cataloggers that know what they are talking about.
<< <i>Smelletrade. >>
Mr Positive, right there.
Teletrade isn't a cesspool. There are good coins there and not so good. Just like ebay. Just like MANY DEALERS.
If that was submitted to TT as a consignment, then I don't see why they wouldn't list it. If it is theirs, different story. At least they have pictures up and you can see and make your own call.
Now, PCGS did remove their color designation guarantee. So, the RD wouldn't matter since this is obviously being sold POST their cutoff for color designation guarantee. However, if the grade isn't there, then it could likely be submitted under the grade guarantee.....how much is a 1914s PCGS MS64 worth, for just the grade? That's likely the only guarantee on it.
I would say it is improper storage that caused the issue.
I've been told I tolerate fools poorly...that may explain things if I have a problem with you. Current ebay items - Nothing at the moment
<< <i>Is that any different than the Southgate link i posted? >>
To me it is... Southgate buys and sells their coins, carrying the full fiscal responsibility. Auction houses "borrow" the coins they auction and make money off of other peoples possessions - there is no or substantially less financial risk... their business model is there ability to draw qualified buyers. If your offerings are substandard, you'll lose clients. If you're a sole proprietor, you may have to buy a collection with dreck and widgets that you have to sell with better coins. You have less options as a sole proprietor... but that's just my two cent piece!
<< <i>I guess i see your point Frank, I will try to only slam Auction houses
Don't confuse me with Frank!
<< <i>Nearly Gem. Red. Well struck. Pleasing surfaces. Toned
See. Now that warn't so hard was it?
<< <i>I can't believe Teletrade would accept that to auction! >>
Hardly the ugliest one they have ever accepted.
Leo
The more qualities observed in a coin, the more desirable that coin becomes!
My Jefferson Nickel Collection
if i'm not mistaken, that isn't entirely true. i thought that the guarantee was still in effect for coins owned by a collector prior to the cut-off date, but the same coin sold after that date loses the guarantee.
<< <i> PCGS did remove their color designation guarantee.
if i'm not mistaken, that isn't entirely true. i thought that the guarantee was still in effect for coins owned by a collector prior to the cut-off date, but the same coin sold after that date loses the guarantee. >>
That was also the impression I've been under since it went into effect. Maybe this particular coin was slabbed after the cut off date?
The coin needs to go back to PCGS not for the color guarantee (keets is correct) but for the grade.
Lance.
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
"Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire
...the only way to know for sure would be if there was a photo on file when it was slabbed. like NGC does.
<< <i>Whatever, that coin is UGLY. >>
How so based on TT's description Nearly Gem. Red. Well struck. Pleasing surfaces. Toned.
<< <i>The certified coin market is based on the grade on the slab. Auctioneers are selling based on that. Imagine how a consignor would react if an auction house claimed his coins were lower than the slabbed grade? >>
I've sold a few PR70DCAMs recently that all had some level of light haze or microspotting visible to the naked eye. The prices didn't seem to reflect that I mentioned the coins had those issues, but I slept better knowing that each was accurately described. It's better for consignors when bidders know a seller is honest and has reliable descriptions; bidders know that when you don't dance around or gloss over problems.
<< <i>The certified coin market is based on the grade on the slab. Auctioneers are selling based on that. Imagine how a consignor would react if an auction house claimed his coins were lower than the slabbed grade? >>
You mean like Stacks does (did?) with Large Cents?
<< <i>What are the chances someone that needs this date for their registry set will buy this for a cheap price? >>
As has been pointed out many times, sometimes cheap isn't cheap enough! Any self respecting collector would turn a sour eye every time that coin got looked at.
Empty Nest Collection
<< <i>My take on this is we can not see how the coin really looks. TT has really bad images at times. I would need to see a good image before I can say the coin is a lemon. It may be a lot different in hand. >>
I think we can see enough to know that this coin is not a desirable specimen for the grade.
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
"Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire
<< <i>
<< <i>My take on this is we can not see how the coin really looks. TT has really bad images at times. I would need to see a good image before I can say the coin is a lemon. It may be a lot different in hand. >>
I think we can see enough to know that this coin is not a desirable specimen for the grade. >>
PCGS should pull it.