Home› Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum
Options

1962 Topps Willie Mays

AlbertdiditAlbertdidit Posts: 560 ✭✭✭
in Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum
I was just wondering why does the:

62 book $250 while the 61 is $100 the 60 is $120 the 63 is $150 (beckett june/july 10)

It's not like the 62 is a high # so why wouldnt it be in the $125 range also?

Comments

  • Options
    nam812nam812 Posts: 10,541 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Condition sensitive brown borders.
  • Options
    gtgrad99gtgrad99 Posts: 227 ✭✭
    Just a hunch, but 60's and 61's mask smaller flaws better than the wood grain on the 62's or the colored bottom portion of the 63's. Probably the same reason that some 71's are worth than their 1970 counterparts.
  • Options
    AlbertdiditAlbertdidit Posts: 560 ✭✭✭
    Ok but the thing is the 61 and 62 Mantle both book $600 and are both low # series
  • Options
    handymanhandyman Posts: 5,245 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Demand
  • Options
    lsutigers1973lsutigers1973 Posts: 11,093 ✭


    << <i>Condition sensitive brown borders. >>



    Agreed. By "book" I assume you mean Beckett. Beckett's high price is based on NRMT/MT condition. 1960 and 61 NRMT/MT are easier to find than 1962s in the same condition.
  • Options
    jimradjimrad Posts: 2,777 ✭✭✭
    SUPPLY = DEMAND

    POP report
    1960 2145 cards submitted
    PSA 10 - 2
    PSA 9 - 17
    PSA 8.5 - 2
    PSA 8 - 207

    1961 2352 cards submitted
    PSA 10 - 1
    PSA 9 - 28
    PSA 8.5 - 2
    PSA 8 - 332

    1962 1290 cards submitted
    PSA 10- 1
    PSA 9 - 9
    PSA 8.5 - 0
    PSA 8 - 66
    Positive transactions with: Bkritz,Bosox1976,Brick,captainthreeputt,cpettimd,craigger,cwazzy,DES1984,Dboneesq,daddymc,Downtown1974,EAsports,EagleEyeKid,fattymacs,gameusedhoop,godblessUSA,goose3,KatsCards,mike22y2k,
    MULLINS5,1966CUDA,nam812,nightcrawler,OAKESY25,PowderedH2O,relaxed,RonBurgundy,samsgirl214,shagrotn77,swartz1,slantycouch,Statman,Wabittwax
  • Options
    AlbertdiditAlbertdidit Posts: 560 ✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>Condition sensitive brown borders. >>



    Agreed. By "book" I assume you mean Beckett. Beckett's high price is based on NRMT/MT condition. 1960 and 61 NRMT/MT are easier to find than 1962s in the same condition. >>



    Yes thats what i meant - by beckett high - so based on what you are saying why does the 61 and 62 mantle both book $600?
  • Options
    AlbertdiditAlbertdidit Posts: 560 ✭✭✭


    << <i>SUPPLY = DEMAND

    POP report
    1960 2145 cards submitted
    PSA 10 - 2
    PSA 9 - 17
    PSA 8.5 - 2
    PSA 8 - 207

    1961 2352 cards submitted
    PSA 10 - 1
    PSA 9 - 28
    PSA 8.5 - 2
    PSA 8 - 332

    1962 1290 cards submitted
    PSA 10- 1
    PSA 9 - 9
    PSA 8.5 - 0
    PSA 8 - 66 >>



    thanks
  • Options
    Dpeck100Dpeck100 Posts: 10,910 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I thought Beckett used NM for all cards prior to 1980 in the price guide. Did they change something?
  • Options
    AlbertdiditAlbertdidit Posts: 560 ✭✭✭
    NM starts from 1973 and prior
  • Options
    Dpeck100Dpeck100 Posts: 10,910 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Well then 62 Beckett would be NM or EX-MT not NM-MT.
  • Options
    digicatdigicat Posts: 8,551 ✭✭
    The card is very prone to snow since Mays is standing in front of a dark background.
    My Giants collection want list

    WTB: 2001 Leaf Rookies & Stars Longevity: Ryan Jensen #/25
  • Options
    handymanhandyman Posts: 5,245 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Beckett,sMR, or anything else is just a guess on what the demand for the card is. image
    Demand is my answer
  • Options
    zep33zep33 Posts: 6,897 ✭✭✭
    A pregnant tree frog wouldn't lay their babies on a beckett
  • Options
    Dpeck100Dpeck100 Posts: 10,910 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Nice one
  • Options
    HoofHeartedHoofHearted Posts: 2,537 ✭✭


    << <i>The card is very prone to snow since Mays is standing in front of a dark background. >>



    I think this is the scan of where it is "snowing" on Willie:

    image

    This set has been a real challenge completing in PSA 7+. I collected the cards as a kid so most of my raw set is G-EX and the wood grain really shows the wear. Once I bought my first PSA 7 to replace a card with writing on it back in '04, I couldn't believe how great the cards looked in NM. I was hooked on completing the set! Ninety-nine percent and counting...
    imageimageimageSenators/Twins Type Collection
  • Options
    QUITCRABQUITCRAB Posts: 1,016 ✭✭✭
    Lets have a beckett burning like the guy in Florida who wanted to burn the Koran...think we will make CNN?
    My crazy school district that I work at had a book burning in the 70s....Went all the way to the supreme court...Island Trees vs Pico..wanted books band from the library shelf.....slaughter house 5 was one of the books.
  • Options
    AlbertdiditAlbertdidit Posts: 560 ✭✭✭
    What does a Mays in 7 usually go for?
  • Options
    handymanhandyman Posts: 5,245 ✭✭✭✭✭
    why do you ask?
  • Options
    AlbertdiditAlbertdidit Posts: 560 ✭✭✭
    Well sounds like its as high as can go with it being affordable
  • Options
    Bosox1976Bosox1976 Posts: 8,536 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Don't forget the smudge often found by Willie's name or the thick black line often seen on the bottom edge - like the snow, each makes finding a nice copy tougher. Hard to avoid all three from the factory -- then the condition sensitive brown borders kick in. $250 for a nice one isn't bad at all.
    Mike
    Bosox1976
  • Options
    marinermariner Posts: 2,580 ✭✭✭✭
    This is a very tough Mays to find due to what has already been said. The snow is generally always a problem in the photo itself and PSA kills the grade due to printing problems. Hence the very low pop on PSA 8's. If you think this is tough, you should try to land a 1962 Topps Frank Robinson.
    Don

    Collect primarily 1959-1963 Topps Baseball
    set registry id Don Johnson Collection
    ebay id truecollector14
  • Options
    lsutigers1973lsutigers1973 Posts: 11,093 ✭


    << <i>A pregnant tree frog wouldn't lay their babies on a beckett >>



    Unless the frog was having baby monkeys
  • Options
    jdmi32jdmi32 Posts: 160
    Tough, tough card to find in high grade. It took a long while for me to locate this example, and it's one of the few cards that I never plan to part with.

    image
    Keith
  • Options
    AlbertdiditAlbertdidit Posts: 560 ✭✭✭
    thats beautiful...well thanks everyone i get why its such a great card now!
  • Options
    TabeTabe Posts: 5,927 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Even that PSA 6 is a pretty nice card - well-centered and nice eye appeal except the snow.

    But, man, that PSA 8 is beautiful.

    Tabe
  • Options
    stevekstevek Posts: 27,773 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Tough, tough card to find in high grade. It took a long while for me to locate this example, and it's one of the few cards that I never plan to part with.

    image >>



    Wow - I don't even dream that good. Heckuva nice card!
  • Options
    AlbertdiditAlbertdidit Posts: 560 ✭✭✭
    Speaking of this card - check out the rare 1963 version:

    Link
  • Options
    53BKid53BKid Posts: 2,164 ✭✭✭
    That's a stunning example. Good for you!
    HAPPY COLLECTING!!!
  • Options
    SOMSOM Posts: 1,555 ✭✭✭
    My heavens! That is a gorgeous 62 Mays 8 Keith!
Sign In or Register to comment.