Home U.S. Coin Forum
Options

1848-D $5 misaligned obverse die (?)

RYKRYK Posts: 35,801 ✭✭✭✭✭
The 1848-D $5 was my first Dahlonega coin. It was sold to me by Al Adams of Gold Rush Gallery at the 2003 CSNS show in St. Louis and started my Dahlonega collection, which eventually included, among others, an entire set of Dahlonega $5's, the ever-popular 1854-D $3, and the Eliasberg-Duke's Creek 1857-D $1.

For that reason, the 1848-D $5 has always held particular interest for me, and I always look at these when they appear for sale or auction. In this summer's Scotsman sale, my interest was piqued when I first saw a very unevenly obverse struck 1848-D $5, the first that I have seen in seven years of looking at the issue. The coin met the ryk dirty gold criteria, so I bid and won the coin. Since then, I have seen two additional coins with a very similar strike, presumably due to a misaligned day. Of course, since then I have seen two others with an identical strike. There is no specific mention of this in DW's book.

Here's the coin I won (in hand, the coin is original--it looks bright in the Scotsman photo):

imageimage

Here's one for sale at Gold Rush Gallery:

imageimage

Here's one for sale in tonight's Heritage auction:

imageimage

Finally, here's the one that I once owned:

imageimage

Comments

  • Options
    BroadstruckBroadstruck Posts: 30,497 ✭✭✭✭✭
    RYK, I see no evidence of this being MAD.

    Here's my example of a Misaligned Die obverse $20.

    imageimage
    To Err Is Human.... To Collect Err's Is Just Too Much Darn Tootin Fun!
  • Options
    RYKRYK Posts: 35,801 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>RYK, I see no evidence of this being MAD. >>


    Broad, what is your learned explanation for the uneven strike? I am personally very weak in the discipline of coin manufacture technology.
  • Options
    CoinosaurusCoinosaurus Posts: 9,654 ✭✭✭✭✭
    RYK-

    Probably the pressure on the dies wasn't set right....or something......In any case, it looks like they figured it out and fixed it at some point, since they come "normally" struck as well. Personally I would actually value the weaker struck one less.
  • Options
    RYKRYK Posts: 35,801 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>RYK-

    Probably the pressure on the dies wasn't set right....or something......In any case, it looks like they figured it out and fixed it at some point, since they come "normally" struck as well. Personally I would actually value the weaker struck one less. >>


    PCGS appears to be accounting for this uneven strike in the grade. My coin was purchased at an attractive price, IMO.
  • Options
    Anecdotally, two thirds or more of the 48-D 5's I have seen have a weak strike on the left obverse. This weakness varies significantly and is always left obverse. I have seen some well struck examples which usually bring an extra 10 to 20%. I speculate the obverse die 'degraded' in this area but, as I ponder this I'm increasingly uncertain of my theory. However, I'll try and get some input from friends with more expertise in this area.
    Collect for enjoyment

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file