Home U.S. Coin Forum
Options

One coin got a +, the other bagged. Answer in first post

Can you tell me which coin got a plus? Coin one or coin two?
image
image
image
image

Shocking, I know. Coins were sent on same sub, and I thought the 54 would be bagged and the O would get an AU grade. Both are nice coins and the large pics are unflattering. The slab shot shows the flash of the 54, which does enhance its appearance. Needless to say the 54-o will get cracked and sent in another day.
image
Blow up of the crumbled die. Note, this is die damage, not whizzing.
Now th slabs, coin 2 bagged for cleaning.
image
image
If I say something in the woods, and my wife isn't around. Am I still wrong?

Comments

  • Options
    telephoto1telephoto1 Posts: 4,966 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Judging by the pics I'd say coin #2 got bagged.

    RIP Mom- 1932-2012
  • Options
    dohdoh Posts: 6,457 ✭✭✭


    << <i>Judging by the pics I'd say coin #2 got bagged >>


    I'm in the other camp...I say coin #1 got bagged. I think #2 looks more attractive based on the pics.

    Edited awhile later: after seeing the holders, I still think coin #2 looks more attractive than coin #1.
    Positive BST transactions with: too many names to list! 36 at last count.
  • Options
    johnny9434johnny9434 Posts: 33,155 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Judging by the pics I'd say coin #2 got bagged. >>



    ill go with coin #2 as well. ( with reservations )
  • Options


    << <i>

    << <i>Judging by the pics I'd say coin #2 got bagged >>


    I'm in the other camp...I say coin #1 got bagged. I think #2 looks more attractive based on the pics. >>



    I agree
  • Options
    ModCrewmanModCrewman Posts: 4,054 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I say coin #1 got bagged.
  • Options
    DennisHDennisH Posts: 14,041 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Judging by the pics I'd say coin #2 got bagged. >>

    Me too.
    When in doubt, don't.
  • Options
    drwstr123drwstr123 Posts: 7,053 ✭✭✭✭✭
    #1 bagged.
  • Options
    PlacidPlacid Posts: 11,299 ✭✭✭
    2=+
    1=BB

    Btw why didnt the coin that got "bagged" get a genuine holder?
  • Options
    AngryTurtleAngryTurtle Posts: 1,610 ✭✭✭
    #2 bagged for altered surfaces.
  • Options
    partagaspartagas Posts: 2,056 ✭✭✭
    Btw why didnt the coin that got "bagged" get a genuine holder?


    The other coin was put in a genuine holder for cleaning. Keep guessing I will post full slab pics in a bit.
    If I say something in the woods, and my wife isn't around. Am I still wrong?
  • Options
    MoldnutMoldnut Posts: 3,116 ✭✭✭✭
    Coin 1 BB coin 2 crumbled die
    Derek

    EAC 6024
  • Options
    RedneckHBRedneckHB Posts: 20,200 ✭✭✭✭✭
    #1 looks "excessively" cleaned.
    Excuses are tools of the ignorant

    Knowledge is the enemy of fear

  • Options
    we need to know the grade

    to be able to tell which coin is grade.7 or higher


    the plus isn't no eye appeal only like NGC - it is high end for the score


    did you mix up the photos?

    from what I see, I can make arguments for both being bagged - but photos can be deceptive
  • Options
    Coin #1 got the "+".

    Coin #2 looks whizzed the way it displays a slight outline around the obverse devices.
    "In the absence of the gold standard, there is no way to protect savings from confiscation through inflation [...] Gold stands in the way of this insidious process. It stands as a protector of property rights." - Alan Greenspan
  • This content has been removed.
  • Options
    partagaspartagas Posts: 2,056 ✭✭✭
    Coin #2 looks whizzed the way it displays a slight outline around the obverse devices.


    Coin #2 is the crumbled die, it is struck from a heavily rusted and deteriorating die. that is why the date looks mushy.
    If I say something in the woods, and my wife isn't around. Am I still wrong?
  • Options


    << <i>Coin #2 looks whizzed the way it displays a slight outline around the obverse devices.


    Coin #2 is the crumbled die, it is struck from a heavily rusted and deteriorating die. that is why the date looks mushy. >>




    It looks like what is discribed here in PCGS's site. Pictures almost match identical.
    "In the absence of the gold standard, there is no way to protect savings from confiscation through inflation [...] Gold stands in the way of this insidious process. It stands as a protector of property rights." - Alan Greenspan
  • Options
    lkeigwinlkeigwin Posts: 16,895 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Coin #1 genuine, code 92
    Coin #2 graded with +

    Without knowing the grade it is tough to say if it deserved the plus, of course. But I like it!
    Lance.
  • Options
    HussuloHussulo Posts: 2,953 ✭✭✭
  • Options
    AUandAGAUandAG Posts: 25,038 ✭✭✭✭✭
    #1 is cleaned and #2 is original.

    bob
    Registry: CC lowballs (boblindstrom), bobinvegas1989@yahoo.com
  • Options
    coinguy1coinguy1 Posts: 13,484 ✭✭✭
    My guess is that the first coin was the one which got bagged. And, in reply to one of the posts to this thread, I see no evidence that the second coin was whizzed.
  • Options
    PerryHallPerryHall Posts: 47,590 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I see some hairlines in the first coin that leads me to believe that it may have been cleaned.

    Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
    "Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
    "Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire

  • Options
    roadrunnerroadrunner Posts: 28,374 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I also rate the bagged coin (54-0) as having better overall surfaces than the other coin. The 54 has many more many hairlines and light scratches. The graders probably bagged it for rough surfaces/corrosion when they are in fact the natural surfaces. Don't feel bad, I've sent in gem seated halves from the Civil War period with striated planchets and they'd come back bagged sometimes for cleaning.

    I couldn't see giving the 54 a + unless the grade is no higher than AU50. The 54-0 is a tad lacking in the luster dept but what do you expect for a New Orleans mint with a crumbled die?

    roadrunner
    Barbarous Relic No More, LSCC -GoldSeek--shadow stats--SafeHaven--321gold
  • Options
    droopyddroopyd Posts: 5,381 ✭✭✭
    Geez, they look about the same to me.
    Me at the Springfield coin show:
    image
    60 years into this hobby and I'm still working on my Lincoln set!
  • Options
    seateddimeseateddime Posts: 6,180 ✭✭✭
    I would have said #1 got bagged
    I seldom check PM's but do check emails often jason@seated.org

    Buying top quality Seated Dimes in Gem BU and Proof.

    Buying great coins - monster eye appeal only.
  • Options
    ColonelJessupColonelJessup Posts: 6,442 ✭✭✭✭✭
    coin #2 called AT
    "People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf." - Geo. Orwell
  • Options
    coolestcoolest Posts: 2,281 ✭✭✭
    I say the more expensive coin gets bagged.
  • Options
    Billet7Billet7 Posts: 4,923 ✭✭✭
    They're both cleaned. I would like to see them in hand, I'm sure they are both nice regardless. I would love to see the New Orleans coin in hand especially. The crumpled die is way cool!!!
  • Options
    I know nothing about this series but isnt the O mint coin doubled? look at Liberty's face and left arm. image
  • Options
    shishshish Posts: 1,219 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Judging from the pictures this is another example of the graders giving more weight to luster and less weight to originality. IMHO this is unfortunate for circulated early silver type coins. I think they should consider giving a coin a bump for superior luster but I believe they are subtracting points for coins with average luster. I'm not knowledgable on this series but I do know that many coins minted at the New Orleans mint do not exibit the same type of luster found on philly products. They will get it right evenually but it can be frustating.
    Liberty Seated and Trade Dollar Specialist

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file