Home› Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum

Help Me Decide - Review or Not

mexpo75mexpo75 Posts: 1,938 ✭✭✭✭
in Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum
This might be one of the nicest centered 35 Chicles I have ever seen. In all of your trained eyes, is it worthy of a review try? Thanks to Keith




image

PackManInNC

Comments

  • bobbyw8469bobbyw8469 Posts: 7,144 ✭✭✭
    Got a scan of the back?

    PS - As everyone knows....reviews tend to be a huge money vacuum. Rarely anything gets bumped. To get a bump, you are gonna have to crack it out. I don't know about you, but me personally, I would NOT want to crack out a high grade vintage card. Knowing my luck, it would come back MINIMUM SIZE REQD......
  • gecko109gecko109 Posts: 8,231 ✭
    Its got a definite tilt.
  • captainthreeputtcaptainthreeputt Posts: 1,235 ✭✭
    Either way that is one beautiful card!
    1911 C55 hockey
    1935 National Chicle
    1961 Golden Press
    1962 Bell Brand Dodgers
    Top 200 cards in the hobby
    Top 250 cards in the hobby
    All time lakers
    All time Dodgers
    1957 Disney Characters
    1965 Donruss Disneyland
    1966 Get Smart
    Brian
  • mexpo75mexpo75 Posts: 1,938 ✭✭✭✭
    Have not had a chance to scan the back. It is clean and centering the same as front. And I agree with you, Bobby, there is no way I would crack this out for a review.
    PackManInNC
  • mcadamsmcadams Posts: 2,618 ✭✭✭
    Did you use a loop before subbing? I was curious if any of the corners might be lightly touched and we just can't tell from the scan? IMO, if there are no surface flaws that you noticed under some good light and if the corners are fine, I don't think the tilt is enough to warrant a grade drop to an 8. The tilt is so minor, its borderline irrelevant. Gotta be something else.
    Successful transactions with: thedutymon, tsalems1, davidpuddy, probstein123, lodibrewfan, gododgersfan, dialj, jwgators, copperjj, larryp, hookem, boopotts, crimsontider, rogermnj, swartz1, Counselor

    Always buying Bobby Cox inserts. PM me.
  • mexpo75mexpo75 Posts: 1,938 ✭✭✭✭
    The card was a crossover from a SGC 8. Corners are still sharp with maybe very, very minor paper loss one or two.
    PackManInNC
  • fkwfkw Posts: 1,766 ✭✭
    Registration is the only slight flaw I see.

    Nice clean NRMT/MINT.
  • mexpo75mexpo75 Posts: 1,938 ✭✭✭✭
    Bump for more opinions thanks.
    PackManInNC
  • MeteoriteGuyMeteoriteGuy Posts: 7,140 ✭✭
    It is a nice card. I am not sure the price on a review, but I would likely try it. A .5 bump would bring some pretty good $, the card would not be out of a place in an 8.5.

    Collecting PSA graded Steve Young, Marcus Allen, Bret Saberhagen and 1980s Topps Cards.
    Raw: Tony Gonzalez (low #'d cards, and especially 1/1's) and Steve Young.
  • gemintgemint Posts: 6,186 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Would PSA bump a card that was already graded under the half point system and deemed not worthy?
    https://ebay.com/sch/gemint/m.html?_nkw=&_armrs=1&_ipg=&_from=
  • Mickey71Mickey71 Posts: 4,261 ✭✭✭✭
    "Would PSA bump a card that was already graded under the half point system"

    I wonder how many have sent in high grade vintage already graded with the new system and received a bump upon review? I wondered this many times.
  • MULLINS5MULLINS5 Posts: 4,517 ✭✭✭
    There is a small chance at a .5 bump because it is centered nice. If you're looking to sell think about what you have in the card, what it will sell at the current grade, and if you would be OK losing the money from a review if the card doesn't come back an 8.5.

    Good luck, keep us posted.
Sign In or Register to comment.