<< <i>Doesn't look like a proof to me. Very nice strike though!
-Paul >>
What made me think it was 50/50 at best is the weakness on the eagles thigh. Would you agree thats a good diagnostic? >>
Honestly, I don't know. I was just judging by the overall look and luster of the coin. On proofs, the fields should be more mirrored, imo. But yes, the proof should have had a better strike on the reverse probably.
Comments
AB
peacockcoins
<< <i>Are you sure that's not a proof? >>
I wondered if it was and would have rolled the dice if I was buying but if it is someone got a heck of a deal on it in an OGH MS66
-Paul
<< <i>Doesn't look like a proof to me. Very nice strike though!
-Paul >>
What made me think it was 50/50 at best is the weakness on the eagles thigh. Would you agree thats a good diagnostic?
"Keep your malarkey filter in good operating order" -Walter Breen
<< <i>
<< <i>Doesn't look like a proof to me. Very nice strike though!
-Paul >>
What made me think it was 50/50 at best is the weakness on the eagles thigh. Would you agree thats a good diagnostic? >>
Honestly, I don't know. I was just judging by the overall look and luster of the coin. On proofs, the fields should be more mirrored, imo. But yes, the proof should have had a better strike on the reverse probably.
-Paul
Unfortunately only a handful of dates ever come with a strike like that...
and they're cold.
I don't want nobody to shoot me in the foxhole."
Mary
Best Franklin Website
<< <i>By today's standards, it might qualify for the coveted PL quality. >>
Or at least a +
No Way Out: Stimulus and Money Printing Are the Only Path Left