Home U.S. Coin Forum

Looking for a CROSSOVER to PCGS. What do you think it'll grade at?

Some trickster sold this to me and it appears after some research that a half dime is NOT the same as a nickel.

What do you think the grade would be in a PCGS crossover from NGC? I haven't even a clue of a clue.

image

I was sooo happy in the good old days of bullion when all I had to worry about was MS/PR70 and what wasn't. image Apparantly lately the lines have become blurred. image

image
image

NOW, THIS is a coin. Honest to goodness Injun head penny. image Most likely NT wouldn't you agree. Not.

image

image

Comments

  • blu62vetteblu62vette Posts: 11,951 ✭✭✭✭✭
    But ....But..... you can spend it like a nickel!!
    http://www.bluccphotos.com" target="new">BluCC Photos Shows for onsite imaging: Nov Baltimore, FUN, Long Beach http://www.facebook.com/bluccphotos" target="new">BluCC on Facebook
  • jesbrokenjesbroken Posts: 10,629 ✭✭✭✭✭
    OK, OK, I'll give you a nickel for it anyway, just to help out and even pay the shipping. BTW--nice indian.
    Jim

    When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest....Abraham Lincoln

    Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it.....Mark Twain
  • WoodenJeffersonWoodenJefferson Posts: 6,491 ✭✭✭✭
    During the "Gold Rush" a half dime to a 49'er could mean a life or death situation. Also, he didn't care if is was tarnished pretty colors or not, his fingers were the prongs.
    Chat Board Lingo

    "Keep your malarkey filter in good operating order" -Walter Breen
  • PlacidPlacid Posts: 11,299 ✭✭✭
    Motley looking coins image
  • EagleEyeEagleEye Posts: 7,677 ✭✭✭✭✭
    That eyeball avitar is freaking me out.

    A half dime wouldn't shine the shoes of a '49er. Their base coin was likely a Mexican 2-Real.
    Rick Snow, Eagle Eye Rare Coins, Inc.Check out my new web site:
  • GrivGriv Posts: 2,804
    Any thoughts?
  • BoomBoom Posts: 10,165
    Hard to make an educated guess Griv.

    Try to get a real close, clear shot, OK!?

    Looks nice to me. image

    P.S. edit to say, I can't see wear here.

    If it's not MS, it HAS to be really close! image
  • DennisHDennisH Posts: 14,011 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Photos aren't good enough for me to even make a guess.
    When in doubt, don't.
  • coinguy1coinguy1 Posts: 13,484 ✭✭✭
    Based on the blurry photos of the 1849 Half Dime, my grade guess is MS66.
  • crazyhounddogcrazyhounddog Posts: 14,071 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Hard to say Griv, your images arn't the best . But based on what I can see I will guess 65/66 range.....Niceimage
    The bitterness of "Poor Quality" is remembered long after the sweetness of low price is forgotten.
  • GrivGriv Posts: 2,804
    Sorry, they weren't my photos so hopefully image these are better.

    Any HINT that this is an AT?????????????????????

    So, on a different subject (hopefully), XF is better than VF right? image

    image
    image
    image
    image
  • coinguy1coinguy1 Posts: 13,484 ✭✭✭
    It looked a lot better in the original images, to me. But it still might be a gem. It's just that luster and color don't look as good, now, so I'm not nearly as optimistic about its condition as I was previously.
  • GrivGriv Posts: 2,804


    << <i>It looked a lot better in the original images, to me. But it still might be a gem. It's just that luster and color don't look as good, now, so I'm not nearly as optimistic about its condition as I was previously. >>



    I know you are kidding me because you couldn't begin to make out the bands on the shield and now you can see them perfectly. If fact, the shield is perfect with NARY a hint of wear.
  • fcloudfcloud Posts: 12,133 ✭✭✭✭
    I hope it grades and not bags. I'll go 65 but I don't know much about nickels image

    President, Racine Numismatic Society 2013-2014; Variety Resource Dimes; See 6/8/12 CDN for my article on Winged Liberty Dimes; Ebay

  • gripgrip Posts: 9,962 ✭✭✭✭✭
    63 would be my guess.
  • coinguy1coinguy1 Posts: 13,484 ✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>It looked a lot better in the original images, to me. But it still might be a gem. It's just that luster and color don't look as good, now, so I'm not nearly as optimistic about its condition as I was previously. >>



    I know you are kidding me because you couldn't begin to make out the bands on the shield and now you can see them perfectly. If fact, the shield is perfect with NARY a hint of wear. >>

    No, I'm not kidding you. The original images were blurry, but the luster and color looked better in them.
  • GrivGriv Posts: 2,804


    << <i>63 would be my guess. >>



    Please, don't guess if you are clueless as you will make me feel empowered by your cluelessness. image

    I can easily rule out MS65 and below just based on my experience with Jefferson's and President MS's, of which I can safely say I have a good deal of experience with.

    What I can't decide is whether this is 66 or 67. My limited "old stuff" grading leads me to split the dif and say MS66+.

    Obviously this is an NGC graded coin based on their newly distinctive 4 white prongs, but I am skeptical of the grade. Haven seen the NGC modern bullion market overgraded fron day one, I have had many here that have not only defended NGC for their modern grading (silly, silly men) as well as their reputation in the classic market.

    While I still call BS on NGC bullion (and maybe everyone in 2010???), I have been convinced that in the classic US coin grading, neither NGC and PCGS can claim absolute victory since NGC statically has the advantage and have shown that they still have that edge.

    So, where is this one come to for a PCGS grade?

    66
    66+
    67
    67+
    68

    image
  • coinguy1coinguy1 Posts: 13,484 ✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>63 would be my guess. >>



    Please, don't guess if you are clueless as you will make me feel empowered by your cluelessness. image

    I can easily rule out MS65 and below just based on my experience with Jefferson's and President MS's, of which I can safely say I have a good deal of experience with.

    What I can't decide is whether this is 66 or 67. My limited "old stuff" grading leads me to split the dif and say MS66+.

    Obviously this is an NGC graded coin based on their newly distinctive 4 white prongs, but I am skeptical of the grade. Haven seen the NGC modern bullion market overgraded fron day one, I have had many here that have not only defended NGC for their modern grading (silly, silly men) as well as their reputation in the classic market.

    While I still call BS on NGC bullion (and maybe everyone in 2010???), I have been convinced that in the classic US coin grading, neither NGC and PCGS can claim absolute victory since NGC statically has the advantage and have shown that they still have that edge.

    So, where is this one come to for a PCGS grade?

    66
    66+
    67
    67+
    68

    image >>

    Of the grade options you listed, I think the first one is the only one with more than a prayer of a chance.
  • GrivGriv Posts: 2,804
    I appreciate your seniority in the market so I would like to ask what exactly drives your grade?

    Like I said before, I think this is easily a PCGS MS66+ or possibly a PCGS MS67. I've looked a several PCGS MS65/66 half dimes for sale over the past week and they don't compare. I don't think your grading is close and maybe you have some emotional struggles to overcome. I don't know, but I had higher expectations of your grading abilities. image
  • coinguy1coinguy1 Posts: 13,484 ✭✭✭


    << <i>I appreciate your seniority in the market so I would like to ask what exactly drives your grade?

    Like I said before, I think this is easily a PCGS MS66+ or possibly a PCGS MS67. I've looked a several PCGS MS65/66 half dimes for sale over the past week and they don't compare. I don't think your grading is close and maybe you have some emotional struggles to overcome. I don't know, but I had higher expectations of your grading abilities. image >>

    I think I'll take a break from this thread and let you get feedback from others, who might not have emotional struggles to overcome and who have better image grading abilities. Perhaps they will find the coin to be more lustrous than I do and the somewhat splotchy appearance more to their liking. And if they agree with your assessment they will, no doubt, be correct.image
  • GrivGriv Posts: 2,804
    Finally, we're getting somewhere. image
  • ColonialCoinUnionColonialCoinUnion Posts: 10,087 ✭✭✭


    << <i>I think this is easily a PCGS MS66+ or possibly a PCGS MS67. >>



    Fortunately, there is a way to find out what PCGS will grade it.
  • GrivGriv Posts: 2,804
    NO WAY! That'll ruin everything. I'm shooting for a grassroots consensus at MS69. image
  • drei3reedrei3ree Posts: 3,430 ✭✭✭✭
    My Photo Grade: Maybe AT, but AT/NT is usually a crap shoot. Probably MS65. Since AT and MS65 aren't options, I'd have to punt. image
  • GrivGriv Posts: 2,804
    Wrong direction and a lot of negative waves. image
  • drei3reedrei3ree Posts: 3,430 ✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Wrong direction and a lot of negative waves. image >>



    The board always grades conservative! That way, if it grades higher, we can whine about "GRADE INFLATION" to save face. image
  • TwoSides2aCoinTwoSides2aCoin Posts: 44,624 ✭✭✭✭✭
    MS 64+*
    or DNC


  • Impossible to say by the photos posted. My guess is 65, but send it in and let us know...
    BGG
  • Decent strike. Dull luster - perhaps not 100% original at some point. Interesting rough neck and throat. First photos way too much light. These are the first thoughts going through my head. First of next set of photos are much better focused with reasonable lighting. Second of next set too much light. Parallel lines - hairlines, polish, wipe, holder? Various ticks. Dull luster. More thoughts.

    65 max in my book. 64 min. Looking for a crossover and it is in a 64 or higher holder? Cross in the holder, don't risk cracking out. That last thought is the only one I am absolutely convinced of.
  • BroadstruckBroadstruck Posts: 30,497 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Since we are rating Cartoons... I'd go G on the IHC, PG-13 on the Seated H10C. image
    To Err Is Human.... To Collect Err's Is Just Too Much Darn Tootin Fun!
  • GrivGriv Posts: 2,804


    << <i>Since we are rating Cartoons... I'd go G on the IHC, PG-13 on the Seated H10C. image >>


    You are mistaken as it's totally R.
  • GrivGriv Posts: 2,804
    You people are just lucky I ain't got no Eagles to grade. image

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file