Dipped proof with loads of die polish. While I do not gravitate toward this look, I must admit that it seems these are easier to sell than most toned pieces.
<< <i>Dipped proof with loads of die polish. While I do not gravitate toward this look, I must admit that it seems these are easier to sell than most toned pieces. >>
See the thing is... In cameo, it is harder to get that black and white contrast with toning... also, I have seen proofs (mostly trade dollars for some reason) turn almost "black."
Of the two I prefer the second, going by the pics. I'm not a big fan of 19th century silver that's blast white, proofs or business strikes, but there certainly is a market for it.
I don't like the die polish lines. I don't know why we even distinguish between die polish lines and hairlines from cleaning when we grade Unc. and Proof coins. They have the same overall effect on eye appeal. My overall opinion is that this coin has the eye appeal of a PR64 CAM so I would not buy it at the stated grade.
Comments
We'll use our hands and hearts and if we must we'll use our heads.
<< <i>Too white for my taste. >>
That's alright for me... I like my cameo's frosty and white
In honor of the memory of Cpl. Michael E. Thompson
<< <i>Dipped proof with loads of die polish. While I do not gravitate toward this look, I must admit that it seems these are easier to sell than most toned pieces. >>
See the thing is... In cameo, it is harder to get that black and white contrast with toning... also, I have seen proofs (mostly trade dollars for some reason) turn almost "black."
In fact the top pop (67 cam) is toned... but the reverse is too dark:
With a bright light the colors may come out...
and, ummmmm
<< <i>I like it. Just someting about the "new" look, rather than toned,. really makes the cameo!
and, ummmmm
yes