Two VF35's...which one is better?

Comments

• Cam40 Posts: 8,146 ✭

  March 27, 2010 5:50AM

  the 1861 O is clearly the better coin for the grade
  

  0
• BaseballAbs Posts: 2,621 ✭

  March 27, 2010 5:55AM

  I agree, however they do look identical.

  Winner of the "You Suck!" award March 17, 2010 by LanLord, doh, 123cents and Bear.

  0
• DennisH Posts: 14,010 ✭✭✭✭✭

  March 27, 2010 5:56AM

  I also prefer the 1861-O.

  When in doubt, don't.

  0
• DieClash Posts: 3,688 ✭✭✭

  March 27, 2010 5:58AM

  
  
  << <i>the 1861 O is clearly the better coin for the grade >>
  
  
  
  No contest. 61-O hands down.

  "Please help us keep these boards professional and informative…. And fun." - DW
  ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BONGO HURTLES ALONG THE RAIN SODDEN HIGHWAY OF LIFE ON UNDERINFLATED BALD RETREAD TIRES

  0
• Barry Posts: 10,100 ✭✭✭

  March 27, 2010 6:00AM

  Agree with above

  0
• ebaytrader Posts: 3,312 ✭✭✭

  March 27, 2010 6:09AM

  The 1861-O looks way better from here but be wary. It may be net graded for something that doesn't show up in the pix.

  0
• Barberian Posts: 4,086 ✭✭✭✭✭

  March 27, 2010 7:01AM

  The 61-O is EF45 in my mind. Very well struck without the flatness on the eagle's left leg. It may have been knocked down for the small chip off the rim at 10:00 on the obverse and/or for the toning. Edited to add that his VF35 grade for the 61-O is another head-scratcher for me. The 75 looks like VF35 to me. I don't see how these coins can be graded equally.

  3 rim nicks away from Good

  0
• ziggy29 Posts: 18,668 ✭✭✭

  March 27, 2010 7:14AM

  The '61-O looks undergraded unless there's something the image isn't telling us, and they saw fit to "net grade" it down because the problems weren't enough to BB -- err, "Genuine" -- it...

  0
• 291fifth Posts: 24,689 ✭✭✭✭✭

  March 27, 2010 7:27AM

  The 1861-O appears to have effectively been net graded due to the rim problem and generally unattractive appearance of the fields. It has the sharpness of an XF.
  
  The 1876 is a rather ordinary looking VF30-35 coin.
  
  Neither one does anything for me.

  All glory is fleeting.

  0
• robkool Posts: 5,934 ✭✭✭✭✭

  March 27, 2010 7:49AM

  The 76' looks like an original skin VF35 coin...
  The 61' o looks like an XF45 dipped/re toned coin (not original) in my opinion...
  I would choose the 1876 if the price is identical.

  Ebay items for sale Current BIN's / The Kingdom Collection

  0