The Boca Collection


I was going through the Heritage Platinum F.U.N. auction calalogs tonite lamenting over coins that I'd like to have. That was bad enough but I then opened The Boca Collection special catalog.

Complete proof runs from 1856 to 1916, 1936-1942, 1950-1952 (I didn't notice any skipped years then again my eyes were bugging out). This catalog is a must reference piece for the bookshelf. Apparently the consignor completed three runs of US silver and minor proof sets covering 1856 to 1916

I'm stunned. MJ
Walker Proof Digital Album
Fellas, leave the tight pants to the ladies. If I can count the coins in your pockets you better use them to call a tailor. Stay thirsty my friends......
Fellas, leave the tight pants to the ladies. If I can count the coins in your pockets you better use them to call a tailor. Stay thirsty my friends......
0
Comments
proofs as offered for auction was the John Story Jenks Collection which was offered by Henry Chapman in 1921. Wonder what's in the Boca Collection Part II?
john
some of the other runs of 1856-1916???? MJ
Fellas, leave the tight pants to the ladies. If I can count the coins in your pockets you better use them to call a tailor. Stay thirsty my friends......
<< <i><<Wonder what's in the Boca Collection Part II?>>
some of the other runs of 1856-1916???? MJ >>
DUH... of course, the OTHER two runs! Wonder how they will compare to the first? Guess we'll just have to wait and see.
Some really neat things in the Platinum Night sale, including two awesome seated quarters both in 66, the 1868 and 1869, can't wait to see them in hand. Some interesting bios accompanying
the 1913 Olsen Nickel and a great read.
It's late
MJ
Fellas, leave the tight pants to the ladies. If I can count the coins in your pockets you better use them to call a tailor. Stay thirsty my friends......
Check out some of my 1794 Large Cents on www.coingallery.org
The sale seems geared towards dealers who will do this, and not collectors who may want a few pieces. I am curious how the sale will do.
merse
Fellas, leave the tight pants to the ladies. If I can count the coins in your pockets you better use them to call a tailor. Stay thirsty my friends......
AB
Thanks...AB
<< <i>The sets in the multi-coin holders were pretty cool but I assume they may have hurt the prices realized a little as it's one more step a dealer had to take to sell the coins individually (as I assume most will be...). Overall I thought the prices realized were fair but not great, I LOVE the 1890 set though, the gold is
I think the live auction for those lots need to happen still. Prices may go up...
<< <i>
<< <i>The sets in the multi-coin holders were pretty cool but I assume they may have hurt the prices realized a little as it's one more step a dealer had to take to sell the coins individually (as I assume most will be...). Overall I thought the prices realized were fair but not great, I LOVE the 1890 set though, the gold is
I think the live auction for those lots need to happen still. Prices may go up... >>
It's quite closed
The multi holder holders housed either the entire seven pieces for example or were split into two holders. I believe Speety is correct that many will be broken up. Again, this "collector" has another entire run of these proof sets.
AB- your stuff is fantastic! FYI- there was a eight piece set 1876 set. Lot 2021 realized $19K plus. I believe your net grades and cameo designations are even better.
I was an underbidder on the 14 piece 1873 set
Fellas, leave the tight pants to the ladies. If I can count the coins in your pockets you better use them to call a tailor. Stay thirsty my friends......
<< <i>I am baffled by this one. I think that the consignor is definitely missing out by not auctioning the coins separately. I can see not breaking up the original, matched sets, but the years that are not matched would probably do much better separately. I would bid extremely strong money for many of the individual coins, but I will probably not bid on anything in the sale as it stands. Not unless I can work something out with another dealer to pick up some coins after I split them up - again, I would not split matched sets. I expect that a lot of these coins will be offered individually after they are cracked and separated. I will keep an eye out during the late winter/ spring shows - say through Baltimore.
The sale seems geared towards dealers who will do this, and not collectors who may want a few pieces. I am curious how the sale will do. >>
I thought the same thing prior to the sale; however, I believe every set brought a premium over what the coins were worth individually.
<< <i>
<< <i>I am baffled by this one. I think that the consignor is definitely missing out by not auctioning the coins separately. I can see not breaking up the original, matched sets, but the years that are not matched would probably do much better separately. I would bid extremely strong money for many of the individual coins, but I will probably not bid on anything in the sale as it stands. Not unless I can work something out with another dealer to pick up some coins after I split them up - again, I would not split matched sets. I expect that a lot of these coins will be offered individually after they are cracked and separated. I will keep an eye out during the late winter/ spring shows - say through Baltimore.
The sale seems geared towards dealers who will do this, and not collectors who may want a few pieces. I am curious how the sale will do. >>
I thought the same thing prior to the sale; however, I believe every set brought a premium over what the coins were worth individually. >>
You would be correct on the ones I was tracking (twenty -six of them). I priced them all individually over the past two weeks in preparing for my bidding strategy. The sets bought more then the sum of their parts individually for the most part, again on the ones I was following......... Bayard, being the resident early proof expert what are your thoughts in reagrds to the pricing action? MJ
Fellas, leave the tight pants to the ladies. If I can count the coins in your pockets you better use them to call a tailor. Stay thirsty my friends......
I'm not a tone collector but these might change my mind!
I think there was only one that looked significantly different than the others.
About putting catalogs on a shelf, I'm about out of shelf space.
I've never given one the heave-ho. Many of them I've looked at the hammer prices in their archives
for the series I collect or might collect and written in the price of the ones that sold.
JT
I collect all 20th century series except gold including those series that ended there.
<< <i>You would be correct on the ones I was tracking (twenty -six of them). I priced them all individually over the past two weeks in preparing for my bidding strategy. The sets bought more then the sum of their parts individually for the most part, again on the ones I was following......... Bayard, being the resident early proof expert what are your thoughts in reagrds to the pricing action? MJ >>
I'm sure there are people on the forum with more proof expertise than me; however, I created a spreadsheet and valued every coin in every 1857-1915 proof set based on the Heritage archives. The bidding on every set except one exceeded those cumulative valuations by a wide margin, sometimes by 50% or more.
I attributed this to people paying a premium for complete sets, and I will admit that the NGC multi-coin holders were a nice novelty, especially when a full set of coins would fit into a single slab. I didn't expect such aggressive bidding though, particularly for sets where the condition of the coins was not well matched. Perhaps people in the know paid extra for toning on some sets; however, I thought every set went high. It's possible that some buyers did not do the math in advance and just kept bidding until the set they wanted was knocked down to them.
I look forward to the remainder of the coins being sold individually.
<< <i>
<< <i><<Wonder what's in the Boca Collection Part II?>>
some of the other runs of 1856-1916???? MJ >>
DUH... of course, the OTHER two runs! Wonder how they will compare to the first? Guess we'll just have to wait and see.
>>
I just noticed that the "other runs" are in the Milawaukee Heritage sale! Geezy Weezzy..............MJ
Fellas, leave the tight pants to the ladies. If I can count the coins in your pockets you better use them to call a tailor. Stay thirsty my friends......
<< <i>
<< <i>
<< <i><<Wonder what's in the Boca Collection Part II?>>
some of the other runs of 1856-1916???? MJ >>
DUH... of course, the OTHER two runs! Wonder how they will compare to the first? Guess we'll just have to wait and see.
>>
I just noticed that the "other runs" are in the Milawaukee Heritage sale! Geezy Weezzy..............MJ >>
Fell asleep on the couch and was just heading off to bed and went to shut down the puter and saw this thread and thought i was having Deja vu from last Dec. and Jan. then i noticed that it was from today...Or i should say yesterday now...lol Anyway heading to bed and if interested MJ i was talking to poorguy today(yesterday) and he did get a peek at them...
Have a great Sunday...
AB
I know two dealers who scored really well with the last group of sets. They cracked and dipped some of the coins. I saw the last group, the sets were nothing special.
Big Moose is right, the Century Collection years ago was incredible.
<< <i>I know two dealers who scored really well with the last group of sets. They cracked and dipped some of the coins. >>
Disgusting
it's especially a shame if those coins that have been together since leaving the mint get separated after this sale
Liberty: Parent of Science & Industry
<< <i>
<< <i>I know two dealers who scored really well with the last group of sets. They cracked and dipped some of the coins. >>
Disgusting >>
<< <i>Not really. One of the coins I saw a before and after on was a proof Morgan. It went fom having horrible toning to being a killer cameo. It did not looked dipped at all. >>
In my opinion this is the biggest problem with numismatics. The mind set that its okay to dip and alter a completely original coin in order to achieve a high grade and thus a higher profit. In your opinion the coin had horrible toning although to many advanced collectors originality far far out weighs higher grades and higher profits.