Question for the legal minded

What if the 1933 Saint are ruled legal to own because the Government can't prove them to be stolen,
Would this be grounds to own a 1964 peace dollar since the mint may have allowed mint employees a 1 to 1 exchange.
Then asked all the 1964 dollars to be returned.
If, just if one or more were kept and there fore not stolen would that ruling apply to the 1964 peace dollars.
Would that be too logical?
Would this be grounds to own a 1964 peace dollar since the mint may have allowed mint employees a 1 to 1 exchange.
Then asked all the 1964 dollars to be returned.
If, just if one or more were kept and there fore not stolen would that ruling apply to the 1964 peace dollars.
Would that be too logical?
Pat Vetter,Mercury Dime registry set,1938 Proof set registry,Pat & BJ Coins:724-325-7211
0
Comments
So, someone out there is trying to take advantage of the 1933 Saint case to try to get someone to purchase the 1964 upon the presumption they will be legal one day, when the fact is they are selling a fake.
Cashback from Mr. Rebates