Grade this Buffalo * grade revealed*

Grade this Buffalo. It is an MS coin and it is genuine. No tricks here.

There is no "AT" or "NT". We only have "market acceptable" or "not market acceptable.
0
Comments
Nice fields. Blooming luster. Overall, a very nice type coin.
"Look up, old boy, and see what you get." -William Bonney.
CoinSpace.com Founder
www.coinspace.com
Great eye appeal.
a.k.a "The BUFFINATOR"
<< <i>Grading buffalo nickels from an image is much like a monkey throwing darts. The results are bound to be all over the place and every once in a while correct.
even a stopped clock is right twice a day
EAC 6024
<< <i>Wow and this one is only a 62
That might be a market grade on an AU coin. Sometimes a coin that is technically AU due to some slight friction is given a low MS grade due to other attributes (such as strike) being exceptional.
EAC 6024
<< <i>I agree with you that they could market grade a coin with slight friction and call it MS60,62. But I tell you I see NO discoloration on the flank what so ever. I bought it on eBay for $46 and when it arrived I was in total shock. What made this a 62? I called it a 64 only because it doesn't have that POP I like to see in a 65 or higher. >>
No friction + no pop on a 20th century coin = light cleaning. Net grade = 62
I dont see the grade revealed?
<< <i>Grading buffalo nickels from an image is much like a monkey throwing darts. The results are bound to be all over the place and every once in a while correct.
Throw your dart
<< <i>I agree with you that they could market grade a coin with slight friction and call it MS60,62. But I tell you I see NO discoloration on the flank what so ever. >>
Agreed. It looks 64. But the graders must have seen something. Perhaps it did have a light cleaning as tradedollarnut mentioned.
<< <i>Agreed. It looks 64. But the graders must have seen something. Perhaps it did have a light cleaning as tradedollarnut mentioned. >>
Why make excuses for the graders and call it as one sees it?