The bad pictures make it look like a photoshop special....not only is there a large spread according to the images but the dates are rotated counter clockwise to one another as well
That would be a rather difficult Photoshop job to make them both come out that way. It looks like a legitimate double-struck error, and would probably benefit from being holdered by a TPG as double-struck (unless, of course, it's not a U.S. Mint product). The cheaper one looks to have a bigger spread than the more spendy one, too.
<< <i>The bad pictures make it look like a photoshop special....not only is there a large spread according to the images but the dates are rotated counter clockwise to one another as well >>
$4500? Guess how many he'll sell at that price. Or any price for that matter.
JT
It is health that is real wealth, not pieces of gold and silver. Gandhi.
I collect all 20th century series except gold including those series that ended there.
From a well-known court case in New York in around 1964/65.
Coin World had a good series of articles on it; they still show up now and then.
The second strike is from fake/false dies.
Retired Collector & Dealer in Major Mint Error Coins & Currency since the 1960's.Co-Author of Whitman's "100 Greatest U.S. Mint Error Coins", and the Error Coin Encyclopedia, Vols., III & IV. Retired Authenticator for Major Mint Errors for PCGS. A 50+ Year PNG Member.A full-time numismatist since 1972, retired in 2022.
<< <i>That 1964 Cent is a counterfiet second strike.
From a well-known court case in New York in around 1964/65.
Coin World had a good series of articles on it; they still show up now and then.
The second strike is from fake/false dies. >>
Somewhere I have a roll of these, it was my understanding that they were produced & marketed by a Rhode Island dealer in the mid 60's, would love to see the original articles if anyone can post them.
buying Rhode Island Nationals please email, PM or call 401-295-3000
I have seen a 1972 with almost as much space between the doubling. Had a chance to buy it and didn't. Been kicking myself every since. Sorry I don't have a pic, the guy that owned it showed it to me in person. If I remember correctly, the spacing was parallel instead of angled on the '72.
Ron
Edited for spelling
Collect for the love of the hobby, the beauty of the coins, and enjoy the ride.
<< <i>That 1964 Cent is a counterfiet second strike.
From a well-known court case in New York in around 1964/65.
Coin World had a good series of articles on it; they still show up now and then.
The second strike is from fake/false dies. >>
Somewhere I have a roll of these, it was my understanding that they were produced & marketed by a Rhode Island dealer in the mid 60's, would love to see the original articles if anyone can post them. >>
I, too, would love to see the articles. I have a multiple struck 64 cent. I count something like 7 strikes on the obverse (nothing on the reverse). Fred has seen it via PCGS submission a couple of years ago and said it was from man-made dies.
Comments
Keeper of the VAM Catalog • Professional Coin Imaging • Prime Number Set • World Coins in Early America • British Trade Dollars • Variety Attribution
<< <i>The bad pictures make it look like a photoshop special....not only is there a large spread according to the images but the dates are rotated counter clockwise to one another as well
$4500? Guess how many he'll sell at that price. Or any price for that matter.
JT
I collect all 20th century series except gold including those series that ended there.
TWO
Reminds me of this one with a little better quality:
The name is LEE!
<< <i>Guess its not one of a kind after all
I'd say zero of a kind.
Ed. S.
(EJS)
From a well-known court case in New York in
around 1964/65.
Coin World had a good series of articles on it;
they still show up now and then.
The second strike is from fake/false dies.
<< <i>That 1964 Cent is a counterfiet second strike.
From a well-known court case in New York in
around 1964/65.
Coin World had a good series of articles on it;
they still show up now and then.
The second strike is from fake/false dies. >>
Somewhere I have a roll of these, it was my understanding that they were produced & marketed by a Rhode Island dealer in the mid 60's, would love to see the original articles if anyone can post them.
If I remember correctly, the spacing was parallel instead of angled on the '72.
Ron
Edited for spelling
<< <i>
<< <i>That 1964 Cent is a counterfiet second strike.
From a well-known court case in New York in
around 1964/65.
Coin World had a good series of articles on it;
they still show up now and then.
The second strike is from fake/false dies. >>
Somewhere I have a roll of these, it was my understanding that they were produced & marketed by a Rhode Island dealer in the mid 60's, would love to see the original articles if anyone can post them. >>
I, too, would love to see the articles. I have a multiple struck 64 cent. I count something like 7 strikes on the obverse (nothing on the reverse). Fred has seen it via PCGS submission a couple of years ago and said it was from man-made dies.
<< <i>Thanks to this thread title I have C+C Music Factory stuck in my head. Excuse me while I go shoot myself. >>
BOOM to the power of BOOM
"A dog breaks your heart only one time and that is when they pass on". Unknown