Options
Another rare coin ruined from cleaning!
Earlycoin
Posts: 110 ✭✭
Earlycoin
Posts: 110 ✭✭
Comments
Plus you don't know how harsh the cleaning is or when it was done.
STATESOF really isn't too rare of a variety, it's just one that is in demand by major variety collectors
I think this will be less the case, though, among common, high-pop coins. Common date Morgans, if you can get a good, solid MS64, problem-free coin with beautiful toning or stunning blast-white surfaces for $50 with little effort, then it's hard to justify much interest in a badly cleaned one. But, an 1893-S or 1879-CC Morgan, it may be worth thinking about, if it's a difference between $2000 for the Genuine one that's essentially AU but improperly cleaned and $10,000 for the one in a holder labelled XF-30.
I also wonder whether or not we are seeing improperly cleaned coins getting rubbed up as pocket pieces, sacrificing some detail and effective net grade points in favor of wearing away the bad polishing. If someone is really brave, one could buy, say, an early 1800s gold in Genuine or one of the other guys' Details holder, crack it out, carry it for a few months in their pocket, rub away the "cabinet friction," and have re-graded a slightly more worn coin, returning in a non-problem holder, to sell back for more.
Steve
My Complete PROOF Lincoln Cent with Major Varieties(1909-2015)Set Registry
<< <i>STATESOF really isn't too rare of a variety, it's just one that is in demand by major variety collectors >>
True, but it is the rarer one of that date.
<< <i>So when will we see a population report on all the "GENUINE" coins that PCGS slabs? >>
That would be nice to see instead of the 16 higher on this coin.
<< <i>"When a coin is cleaned or doctored, it loses its magical ability to transport me to its time of issue." - MrEureka >>
Well put! Thank you!
My E-Bay Stuff