Notice on this coin how as you move CCW around the edge from top to bottom that there is a no toning shadow that progressively gets more pronounced near the lettering and stars. Why is that same characteristic not present on the couple of BC coins posted on page 4?
Need a Barber Half with ANACS photo certificate. If you have one for sale please PM me. Current Ebay auctions
<< <i>Here's an idea Folks: Quit buying this stuff and more importantly, quit posting and bragging about the "beauty" of some of this junk! >>
So I presume you do not have any Peaclock Ikes in your collection, right? >>
No Peaclock's but I do have a nicely toned 1971-D Peacock if you want to call it that.
I bought it and I don't have a problem with it. Do you?
Or are you just trying to neutralize my comments with regard to toned Morgans and the constant bickering over AT vs NT when 99 out of a 100 of you don't really know the difference?
I decided to change calling the bathroom the John and renamed it the Jim. I feel so much better saying I went to the Jim this morning.
<< <i>I bought it and I don't have a problem with it. Do you?
Or are you just trying to neutralize my comments with regard to toned Morgans and the constant bickering over AT vs NT when 99 out of a 100 of you don't really know the difference? >>
The word censor won't let me type the correct spelling of Pkok. So you are saying all of the Pkok Ikes are NT? If you are, then why do you have a problem with bag toned Morgans such as the Battle Creek and Continental Illinois coins?
<< <i>Around 5-6 years ago. A number of the toned coins from the bag have since turned a muddy brown color. >>
That might be more of a storage issue. My local dealer got kinda turned off by toners when someone placed a bunch of raw ones into a SDB and left them there for a long time. I guess they ended up lookin sorta ugly.
Hmmmm.....yet another thread on bogus vs. good bag toned Morgan dollars, and per usual those who couldn't tell the difference to save their own life are the most opinionated and vocal on the subject. Some things here never change.
What??? There's a Toned Coin Collector's Society??? Wouldn't that, in it's self, create a demand for toned coins? Need I quote P.T. Barnum at this point??? Shag
Comments
<< <i>Here's an idea Folks: Quit buying this stuff and more importantly, quit posting and bragging about the "beauty" of some of this junk! >>
So I presume you do not have any Peaclock Ikes in your collection, right?
<< <i>
<< <i>Here's an idea Folks: Quit buying this stuff and more importantly, quit posting and bragging about the "beauty" of some of this junk! >>
So I presume you do not have any Peaclock Ikes in your collection, right?
No Peaclock's but I do have a nicely toned 1971-D Peacock if you want to call it that.
I bought it and I don't have a problem with it. Do you?
Or are you just trying to neutralize my comments with regard to toned Morgans and the constant bickering over AT vs NT when 99 out of a 100 of you don't really know the difference?
The name is LEE!
<< <i>I bought it and I don't have a problem with it. Do you?
Or are you just trying to neutralize my comments with regard to toned Morgans and the constant bickering over AT vs NT when 99 out of a 100 of you don't really know the difference? >>
The word censor won't let me type the correct spelling of Pkok. So you are saying all of the Pkok Ikes are NT? If you are, then why do you have a problem with bag toned Morgans such as the Battle Creek and Continental Illinois coins?
<< <i>Just curious if Tondedcointrader ever responded to this thread? I did not see anything. >>
He didn't respond in this thread, but he did respond many times in the threads on the tccs website.
<< <i>Around 5-6 years ago. A number of the toned coins from the bag have since turned a muddy brown color. >>
That might be more of a storage issue. My local dealer got kinda turned off by toners when someone placed a bunch of raw ones into a SDB and left them there for a long time. I guess they ended up lookin sorta ugly.
<< <i>
<< <i>Just curious if Tondedcointrader ever responded to this thread? I did not see anything. >>
He didn't respond in this thread, but he did respond many times in the threads on the tccs website. >>
At this moment in time, me thinks responding here would be akin to jumping head first into a rotating log shredder.
"Keep your malarkey filter in good operating order" -Walter Breen
Shag