hmm, what am I missing on this grade?

Just got some cards back from PSA, and am a little stumped why this Ryan got a 7. Only thing I can see are some print defects. Centering and corners are great. Any ideas?

Registry Sets
"Common sense is the best distributed commodity in the world, for every man is convinced that he is well supplied with it"
"Common sense is the best distributed commodity in the world, for every man is convinced that he is well supplied with it"
0
Comments
1994 Pro Line Live
TheDallasCowboyBackfieldProject
Still, it looks 8-8.5 to me
On the front, I did notice an ever so slight indentation, possibly the cause of the 7
"Common sense is the best distributed commodity in the world, for every man is convinced that he is well supplied with it"
"Molon Labe"
<< <i>does it matter? >>
I don't know, does it?
"Common sense is the best distributed commodity in the world, for every man is convinced that he is well supplied with it"
it's a $750 card in psa 9
So i imagine there's quite a bit of $ difference between 7 and 8
For me it would be worth a re-sub
Times like this you wish PSA would specify reason behind a grade
EditL Card appears blurry at first glance and that's probably why it was graded NM.
Collecting 1970s Topps baseball wax, rack and cello packs, as well as PCGS graded Half Cents, Large Cents, Two Cent pieces and Three Cent Silver pieces.
<< <i>Otherwise perfect at first glance, a card that receives a 7 has a fold or bend toward one of the corners. Not exactly on the corner but on the edge leading to the corner. Flip the card over and look on the back. Adjust it in the lighting so you can see different angles. >>
LMM
I was always under the assumption that a fold / bend / indentation was an automatic 6 ?
Looking for 1970 MLB Photostamps
- uncut
Positive Transactions - tennesseebanker, Ahmanfan, Donruss, Colebear, CDsNuts, rbdjr1, Downtown1974, yankeeno7, drewsef, mnolan, mrbud60, msassin, RipublicaninMass, AkbarClone, rustywilly, lsutigers1973, julen23 and nam812, plus many others...
----------------------
Working on:
Football
1973 Topps PSA 8+ (99.81%)
1976 Topps PSA 9+ (36.36%)
1977 Topps PSA 9+ (100%)
Baseball
1938 Goudey (56.25%)
1951 Topps Redbacks PSA 8 (100%)
1952 Bowman PSA 7+ (63.10%)
1953 Topps PSA 5+ (91.24%)
1973 Topps PSA 8+ (70.76%)
1985 Fleer PSA 10 (54.85%)
P.S. How does that Musial 58 A.S. look?
That print issue on the name "Astros' is print registration. It also can be seen on the right border (The long yellow line)
and on the left one (Black line) Also a line can be seen that runs right through his leg.
I guess the could have given this card a 9 OF grade. They rarely use that qualifier though.
Steve
Erik
THE FOCUS
<< <i>
<< <i>Otherwise perfect at first glance, a card that receives a 7 has a fold or bend toward one of the corners. Not exactly on the corner but on the edge leading to the corner. Flip the card over and look on the back. Adjust it in the lighting so you can see different angles. >>
LMM
I was always under the assumption that a fold / bend / indentation was an automatic 6 ? >>
You're half right. While a fold/bend is basically the same word in regards to card condition, an indentation is not.
A fold/bend usually results in a 7.
A surface indentation usually results in a 6
1994 Pro Line Live
TheDallasCowboyBackfieldProject