Options
Anyone ever deal with great southern coin on Ebay?
Just wondering if anyone has purchased anything off of them. Their pictures appear to be slightly juiced or maybe it's just me. Also, they must have an endless supply of classic coins. I've never seen a dealer with a stock like them. Any info please post.
Tom
http://shop.ebay.com/greatsoutherncoin/m.html?_nkw=&_armrs=1&_from=&_ipg=
Tom
http://shop.ebay.com/greatsoutherncoin/m.html?_nkw=&_armrs=1&_from=&_ipg=
0
Comments
Lance.
Here's some answers to your question -
Yikes!
Ouch!
Ryan
Tom
Positive BST Transactions with a bunch of members
One man gathers what another man spills
They took the coin back saying it must have slipped through due to the large volume of coins they handle.
<< <i>I have to thank them, about four and half years ago I purchased a raw SLQ from them. It was both harshly cleaned and dipped, my first return on Ebay and really opened my eyes.
They took the coin back saying it must have slipped through due to the large volume of coins they handle. >>
Yeah, that must have been what happened.
My only purchases from them have been PCGS-certified coins. Things have always been very smooth and professional.
I find myself asking the very same questions.
Sean Reynolds
"Keep in mind that most of what passes as numismatic information is no more than tested opinion at best, and marketing blather at worst. However, I try to choose my words carefully, since I know that you guys are always watching." - Joe O'Connor
<< <i>I just received a coin from them yesterday, this one, actually. The clip is genuine, but the coin sure looked full red in the photo and it sure looks red-brown in my hands. Not the biggest deal in the world but it did cost them a couple of stars in their feedback.
Sean Reynolds >>
It looks like that coin was from tomscollectables not greatsoutherncoins
Positive BST Transactions with a bunch of members
One man gathers what another man spills
have certain "looks" to them ... like different type lens are being used.
Next time any of you happen upon eithers' coin make note of this & if you know
what's going on regarding type of lens, please share it with the rest of us.
Pics are what sell coins or can ruin a perfectly nice coin's chances.
Whatever type cameras they use, they sure work great! Sometimes SCARY nice!
Beyond type cameras I feel the type lens used play huge roles in the way their coins look.
Anyone care to offer an expert opinion or know for sure?
Thanks.
<< <i>I'm not the most camera savvy guy here but their images, along with hsturn,
have certain "looks" to them ... like different type lens are being used.
Next time any of you happen upon eithers' coin make note of this & if you know
what's going on regarding type of lens, please share it with the rest of us.
Pics are what sell coins or can ruin a perfectly nice coin's chances.
Whatever type cameras they use, they sure work great! Sometimes SCARY nice!
Beyond type cameras I feel the type lens used play huge roles in the way their coins look.
Anyone care to offer an expert opinion or know for sure?
Thanks. >>
For at least some of his images he uses a Nikon D50 with a 60mm lens.
Edit: Just to expand on this a little...
Link to the coin...
Model: Nikon D50
Focal Length: 60mm
Shutter: 1/125
Exposure: Manual
Light Source: Tungsten (Temperature setting in the camera)
Metering: Pattern
Software: Adobe Photoshop CS2 Macintosh
Don't everyone go ga ga over the fact he is using Photoshop for some level of post processing. While I may personally have doubts about the honesty of some of his images, the fact that it was processed in some way with Photoshop doesn't in any way weight the scales against him.
just as years ago films came out in Panavision (wide angled for the Big screen),
when I look at my loupe I see that one side is concave and the other convex.
As opposed to a normal lens does the lens you refer to have a convex shaped lens
or whatever it may be called? Note how hsturns' coins almost look like they are not flat
but rather concave (bowl shaped). Does this make any sense or is otherwise applicable
to the lens you refer to?
Thanks.
Spelling edit*
<< <i>
<< <i>I just received a coin from them yesterday, this one, actually. The clip is genuine, but the coin sure looked full red in the photo and it sure looks red-brown in my hands. Not the biggest deal in the world but it did cost them a couple of stars in their feedback.
Sean Reynolds >>
It looks like that coin was from tomscollectables not greatsoutherncoins >>
Nemmind, I'm reading impaired, the Lincoln above was from Gold Coast, not Great Southern. Sorry for the confusion.
Sean Reynolds
"Keep in mind that most of what passes as numismatic information is no more than tested opinion at best, and marketing blather at worst. However, I try to choose my words carefully, since I know that you guys are always watching." - Joe O'Connor
<< <i>Thanks pheh. I don't know correct terminology when talking different lens types but
just as years ago films came out in Panavision (wide angled for the Big screen),
when I look at my loupe I see that one side is concave and the other convex.
As opposed to a normal lens does the lens you refer to have a convex shaped lens
or whatever it may be called? Note how hsturns' coins almost look like they are not flat
but rather concave (bowl shaped). Does this make any sense or is otherwise applicable
to the lens you refer to?
Thanks.
Spelling edit* >>
I am probably not the best person to answer this question. But perhaps what you are seeing is lens distortion combined with the angle the object was shot at. I don't think any lens created distortions should really be enough to create a bowl shaped coin though.
so if you end up being high bidder on much of their stuff, you overspent
Yeah, I'd agree, sinin1, that lighting & angles have much to do with much
but especially on hsturn's coin his coin pics make the coin surfaces appear
rounded in something of a bowl shape
I'm just a novice point- shoot & crop to size guy
The BIG BOYS of digital photography could probably shed some light on this.
Is there such a thing as a "fish-eyed" lens & if, by chance there IS - would
it somehow apply to hsturn's pics? Not trying to single him out for anything
but to me his coins' surface DO appear somewhat concave. Check 'em out!
Does this make ANY sense at all? Whatever type camera/ lens - their pics
always seem to make coins look really nice!
Typo edit*
Franklin-Lover's Forum
A fisheye lens would not be a good choice for a coin, as they have a very wide angle of view (often 180 degrees from corner to corner). The coin would be a tiny thing in the center of the frame and you would have to crop the photo.
I purchased a raw gold coin from hsturn. It was authentic, but it was cleaned.