Home U.S. Coin Forum
Options

For all practical purposes, is shill bidding any worse than bidding against a hidden reserve?

PerryHallPerryHall Posts: 47,540 ✭✭✭✭✭
image

Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
"Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire

Comments

  • Options
    dohdoh Posts: 6,457 ✭✭✭
    Only that the shill can keep upping his bid, it's like a changing reserve.

    Positive BST transactions with: too many names to list! 36 at last count.
  • Options
    Billet7Billet7 Posts: 4,923 ✭✭✭
    Only because it creates a false sense of demand. It makes potential buyers thing there is something more desirable about the item then there is in reality.

    Other than that...there is no difference in my mind.
  • Options
    19Lyds19Lyds Posts: 26,503 ✭✭✭✭
    No.


    "Only that the shill can keep uping his bid, it's like a changing reserve."

    True but if the shill stops at the predetermined "reserve" then its really the same issue which is what I think Perry is referring to.

    Anything else would be a scam.
    I decided to change calling the bathroom the John and renamed it the Jim. I feel so much better saying I went to the Jim this morning.



    The name is LEE!
  • Options
    Billet7Billet7 Posts: 4,923 ✭✭✭


    << <i>Only that the shill can keep uping his bid, it's like a changing reserve. >>



    Doh brings up a good point, as always.
  • Options
    WalmannWalmann Posts: 2,806
    There is also that component of competing in a bidding "war" to win an item that a reserve does not trigger.

    How many times have you seen a coin not sell at a BIN price, then is relisted as a true no reserve auction and end up hammering at a higher price than the BIN.

    Often the result of the "I must win" mentality that a reserve or BIN listing does not involve.

    So for that segment of the population that is afflicted with "I must win" syndrome shill bidding is worse.
  • Options
    Yes when it is specifically prohibited in that venue, it is worse, IMO.

    For instance, if done on ebay from a 99 cent starting bid, the auction would be considered a true, no reserve auction. In this case, a shill makes that untrue.
    imageQuid pro quo. Yes or no?
  • Options
    dorkkarldorkkarl Posts: 12,691 ✭✭✭


    << <i>is shill bidding any worse than bidding against a hidden reserve? >>

    yes because it is a moving target

    K S
  • Options
    phehpheh Posts: 1,588
    Not if you speaking about a venue which *only* has hidden reserves. Meaning you aren't even aware of whether or not a reserve has been set.

    In that case both practices present the bidder with an unclear sense of demand. I quit bidding at Teletrade for most coins (not all) due to this.

    If by hidden reserve you mean that it is clearly understood that there is a reserve, but you simply don't know what it is set at. Then yes - there is a big difference because shill bidding creates an artificial demand.
  • Options
    PerryHallPerryHall Posts: 47,540 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Only that the shill can keep upping his bid, it's like a changing reserve. >>



    If the shill gets greedy or unrealistic in his expectations, doesn't he run the risk of "buying" his own coin and then paying all the auction fees?

    Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
    "Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
    "Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire

  • Options
    shorecollshorecoll Posts: 5,447 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Maybe on eBay, but in person shills working for the house don't pay any fees. I think shilling is against the law in almost all states for live auctions (although I think it happens all the time), therefore it should be illegal online as well.

    The other thing I've seen in live auctions is the fast hammer, where the auctioneer "trying to speed things up" hammers to a shill without acknowledging other bids.
    ANA-LM, NBS, EAC
  • Options
    dorkkarldorkkarl Posts: 12,691 ✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>Only that the shill can keep upping his bid, it's like a changing reserve. >>



    If the shill gets greedy or unrealistic in his expectations, doesn't he run the risk of "buying" his own coin and then paying all the auction fees? >>

    not if he works for the auction co.

    (wink wink)

    K S
  • Options
    ajiaajia Posts: 5,411 ✭✭✭
    If the shill gets greedy or unrealistic in his expectations, doesn't he run the risk of "buying" his own coin and then paying all the auction fees?

    Not if the 'shiller' doesn't come through, and a 'Second Chance' is offered to the under-bidder. image
    image
  • Options
    PerryHallPerryHall Posts: 47,540 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>If the shill gets greedy or unrealistic in his expectations, doesn't he run the risk of "buying" his own coin and then paying all the auction fees?

    Not if the 'shiller' doesn't come through, and a 'Second Chance' is offered to the under-bidder. image >>



    Sounds like a good reason to reject second chance offers.



    Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
    "Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
    "Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file