I'm a Trimmer Dont buy from me!!

Hi, My name is Felicia, I bought several sealed vending cases of 1976 Topps, I opened the cases, opened the sealed vending boxes, pulled out the cards, put them in card savers, sent them in, and psa graded my cards evidence of trimming.
Humm....

Where they just so awesome your graders couldn't figure out how its possible that my cards could be that smoking, so rather than give them a 10 ( which they deserved) you kept my money and called me a trimmer..
WOW!!!
I do love PSA, I do think they are the best, I defend them all the time, I stand by them and for the most part they get it right, but I'm sorry, you just were wrong on this one, dead wrong!
and before you all chime in with the board line...
I'll say it for you...
I'm Sorry This Happened to you!!
The Link below will take you to the PSA Boards 1952 Set Build, I also have made 5 slideshows each slideshow is 100 cards long, card numbers 1-99,100-199,200-299,300-399, and 400-407
Link To Scanned 1952 Topps Cards Set is now 90% Complete Plus Slideshows of the 52 Set
Link To Scanned 1952 Topps Cards Set is now 90% Complete Plus Slideshows of the 52 Set
0
Comments
Sometimes I think it's a money grab, and sometime I don't think the graders really know what EOT looks like.
Time to play the resub game.
CDsNuts, 1/9/15
Yes they did grade most of them I got some 10's alot of 9's...
in fact, I did get a pop 1 of 1 psa 10 ( Ken Rietz)
But others were labeled evid of trimming, While yes they miss some, I'd rather be told that the cards were something else, but evid of trimming..comeon!!
they should have a category:
N12: Card just to smoking to believe it wasn't altered, it cut the fingers of grader when he/she took it out of said card saver.
Link To Scanned 1952 Topps Cards Set is now 90% Complete Plus Slideshows of the 52 Set
I've sent in a few cards in the past that I bought raw, and submitted them because I thought they were worthy... just to end up EOT.
What do I do with these cards?... well, consider them trash for the most part... wonder if I've 'trashed' some cards there were actually GOOD???
Hope PSA gets this righted for you Felicia, and someone gets a stern talkin' to over at the graders table.
Edit'd for grammer corrections...
ALWAYS Looking for Chris Sabo cards!
Good Luck
Kirk
<< <i>N12: Card just to smoking to believe it wasn't altered, it cut the fingers of grader when he/she took it out of said card saver. >>
CDsNuts, 1/9/15
here's my little tidbit.....from a handful of old Fleer football cards which were ALL deemed EOT, i found the following results from 7 different cards:
2 of them, i just couldn't understand how in the world they could do such a thing to me, so i sent them back in.....they now each reside in a PSA 8 holder.
but the other 5
two of them have some weird miscut, THANKS FLEER!, on the back where paper on the top border seems to have been peeled away, but the front views look perfect, cards measure up, etc. etc.....but they won't go back because of the cut
one of them has a grooved line directly down the middle of the card....if not for that, it would be a DROP DEAD PSA 10 in my humbled opinion
the last two show evidence of something which will keep them out of PSA holders, but it ain't trimming.......it would be the enormous CREASES on the card backs......
of course, this all happened when i was a grading neophyte, but now i use a loupe and some common sense.......but, i must wonder occasionally if they are using some kind of modified Wheel Of Fortune when they are just not sure......i think you got some crappy spins, Felicia.
Very sorry to hear your frustration about this.
Buying Vintage, all sports.
Buying Woody Hayes, Les Horvath, Vic Janowicz, and Jesse Owens autographed items
I really think PSA graders are like cops, at the end of the months cops have to give out more tickets to meet their quotas – PSA graders are the same and the have to give out so many EOT’s each month.
Now slowly put down your trimming devices and give PSA a call!
send me the eot and I'll take the chance of resubbing them.
really though sorry about that
sky
I agree with some prior posts ... Give Joe a call and tell him about the vending case you purchased. I would even call Steve (you bought it from him, right?) and ask him to call Joe to confirm that you purchased the case from him. I have always said that the EOT label is a way to keep down the pops and generate more money ... and also an "out" for an inexperienced grader. Yes, I am sure very often that there is DEFINITE EOT and it deserves such a label, but other times you have to wonder why a grader labels it as such.
GOOD LUCK AND MAKE THOSE CALLS NOW!!!!!!
Please let us know the results.
Doug
Liquidating my collection for the 3rd and final time. Time for others to enjoy what I have enjoyed over the last several decades. Money could be put to better use.
Felicia is one of the most well respected board members but this subject is one of the taboo subjects around here isn't it!? I believe everybody trusts Felicia and thus this is "proof" (at least to me) that PSA does not know what EOT is in every case. I don't think PSA likes this kind of proof to be out in the air for everybody to see....
Felicia,
Call first thing and get the Sub stopped in shipping. I have had this happen to me several times. The most recent a lot of 87 Fleer Basketball, busted a box, sub'd about 70 and 30+ came back Evid. of Tri. I wrote a long memo to Joe and spoke to him several times. The cards were re-evaluated and lo and Behold 29 of them made it into MINT 9 and GEM MINT 10 holders....Imagine that.
You have the double whammy of being able to reference the thread where you busted them on PSA's boards. Don't see any way they don't get Re-Graded and put in holders.
But call Joe NOW!!!!!!!! And get the shipping put on hold!!!!
Neil
<< <i>...I do love PSA, I do think they are the best, I defend them all the time, I stand by them and for the most part they get it right, but I'm sorry, you just were wrong on this one, dead wrong!... >>
I could not disagree more. Occurrences such as this happen far too often for TPG to retain any credibility with me. If one wishes to maximize profits from card sales, just keep submitting until you get the desired grade. It's as simple as that. If, however, one is truly a collector who loves acquiring and owning quality cards, KEEP THEM RAW.
Mike
Bosox1976
JK
I just think PSA tries to error on the side of caution when some
cards 'look too nice' and so they hand out the EOT moniker.
Just about every major submitter I know has had legit cards rejected for signs of tampering. Don't take it personally. Really
just call Joe or Kevin the new operations manager, and they'll
usually look into it with an open mind. I'm sure they'd rather have
happy customers than angry ones.
Grading is not hard, but it's really very subjective at times.
Just about all cards can grade a notch higher or lower on different
days/views.
A friend just had an Aaron card go from 7 to EOT to an 8 holder.
It really should've been an 8 from the get go, but it just didn't
happen this way. $hit happens.
Raw is great for many cards, but if you want to get the most
dollars for most cards, you need to grade them. That's just reality.
Sorry this happened to you Felicia.
<< <i> If, however, one is truly a collector who loves acquiring and owning quality cards, KEEP THEM RAW. >>
Don't start getting into that BS. Some people like graded cards, some don't. People like collecting different things. Get off your pedestal thinking you are better because you collect raw.
I can't really add much to this, but if there are only a small handful, I'd just re-sub
Another poster said ALWAYS keep your EV TRIMS. This is absolutely true. I have a small pile of these that I know are not trimmed b/c I pulled them myself
(still in their cardsavers) that I pull from and re-sub every now an then.
They almost always get a grade.
<< <i> If, however, one is truly a collector who loves acquiring and owning quality cards, KEEP THEM RAW. >>
Says the guy who would most likely get his feeling hurt if someone were to actually GRADE the raw cards that he calls mint.
Honestly, from a standpoint of "what it is", is there any difference between an oversized card that was trimmed to regular size that would grade a 10 and one that came out of the pack that way? No!!! Ive only had one EOT come back and a miscut 77 Yount that when resubbed came back a 9!!!!
I realize that there is a lot of subjectivity on grades, but there is a big difference between saying a card has EVIDENCE of trimming and one that is 10. My question has always been, WHAT exactly is the EVIDENCE of trimming?
I've had this happen several times and I believe that PSA is just very careful with anything that looks a little smaller than normal. I purchased about 2000 1974 vending baseball about 10 years ago. I sent in groups of 100 al the time, getting 8's, 9's and even some 10's. Sold them on ebay and made good $$$ when the population numbers were still low. About 4-5 years ago, I got my grades back and the first 10 or so were graded and then 80-90 in a row were listed as EOT. Called Joe and he had me send them back to him and he had another grader look at them. Most came back graded. As with you, I told Joe that these were from vending so I knew they weren't trimmed, maybe mini-sized, but not trimmed. A couple months ago I sent in about 20 more of these cards and about 12-15 came back as EOT. I didn't followup on these but I will resubmit some. Upon inspection, they were a little smaller than usual but I know they were not trimmed.
I always thought that EOT was determined more by studying the edges. Trimmed cards have smooth cuts and fresh white or gray paper color on the edge. I have many PSA 9 cards that vary in size, even in the same year, so I know PSA doesn't automatically determine they are trimmed based on size. As others have mentioned, if you are sure they are not trimmed, give Joe a call and I am sure PSA will review them for you at no cost.
<< <i>
<< <i> If, however, one is truly a collector who loves acquiring and owning quality cards, KEEP THEM RAW. >>
Don't start getting into that BS. Some people like graded cards, some don't. People like collecting different things. Get off your pedestal thinking you are better because you collect raw. >>
Why the hostility? You are reading into what I've said. I have not placed myself on a pedestal, nor have I criticized those who prefer collecting graded cards. To suggest that I think I'm "better" is absurd, and sounds a little defensive.
You got some good and sound advice on this thread so I have nothing to add to it except.....I'm quitting the hobby over this.
23 1 15507738 N1: EVIDENCE OF TRIMMING 1960 TOPPS 122 DON DILLARD ROOKIE STAR Card US
24 1 15507739 N1: EVIDENCE OF TRIMMING 1960 TOPPS 188 DICK WILLIAMS Card US
video of pack break from bbckid price guide
<< <i>
<< <i> If, however, one is truly a collector who loves acquiring and owning quality cards, KEEP THEM RAW. >>
Says the guy who would most likely get his feeling hurt if someone were to actually GRADE the raw cards that he calls mint. >>
Again, why the hostility? For those of you who prefer TPG, why do you feel threatened by those who don't? I have sent in many cards to PSA and have had the same mixed results as have all submitters.
My gripe is not with card grading, per se. My gripe is with the ridiculous inconsitency with which the grading standards are applied. We have all experienced or heard of many instances where the same card was submitted many times until a desired grade was achieved. Very often these multiple submissions reflect a wide range of grades and/or reasons for non-holdering. This brings into question the credibility of the entire process.
If you find that offensive or threatening, I feel badly for you.
As for ymarea (Brett), he is one of the finest collectors/people on these boards and very generous (both with cards & knowledge). I wish there were more folks like Brett on these boards and in our hobby-thank you Brett!
Mike
EOT needs to be changed, because the word "evidence" is in there and they never provide any evidence.
I am a true believer that if the card looks too good to be true especially with vintage or high dollar cards (jordan fleer?),
and the grader is unsure, they'll stick the EOT just to save face and their butts.
For someone like Felicia who spends thousands of dollars on older cases for the sole purpose of getting pack fresh
cards for submission and then getting robbed, is an absolute joke. Now she has to play the re-sub game and give
them more money and hopefully the cards land in the proper hands of someone who can actually grade and knows
what they're doing. And yes, "I'm sorry this happened to you." Okay, I'm done.
<< <i>
Why the hostility? You are reading into what I've said. I have not placed myself on a pedestal, nor have I criticized those who prefer collecting graded cards. To suggest that I think I'm "better" is absurd, and sounds a little defensive. >>
Perhaps I did read too much into your post. It just seemed like you were making those who collect raw to be the true collectors over those who buy graded, you see a lot of that on some of these boards. I think I forgot my #1 rule about forum posting which is to not take a certain tone from a posting. Sorry for the rude tone
........................ I'm sooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo sorry this happened to you!
All kidding aside, that really sucks. Because I'm certain that you know what a "razor blazer" gem is.
I retired my #1 all-time (still #1, I can't believe it, but it is!) 1976 Topps baseball PSA registry set a few years ago. I cannot begin to tell you how many cards it took to obtain 100s of PSA 10s for that set. And the passion this series held (still does!) for me!
And when you obtain a "sure-shot blazer 10" and it popped as a EOT (especially when you pulled it out of a case! Yikes!).
I'm pissed-off just hearing about it!
......................... I feel your pain!
......................... My goodness! The dollars I would have given-up for a Ken Reitz 10!
......................... Do not know how many EOTs you got, hope it is only a few? (...if so, just resub them! if more than a few, maybe you should do the Orlando thing?)
P.S. I miss Noodles at the Bellagio (...just love that place! best wonton soup on the planet!)
Quicksilver Messenger Service - Smokestack Lightning (Live) 1968
Quicksilver Messenger Service - The Hat (Live) 1971
Thanks for the reply. I really appreciate it. Honest!
That Dick Towle interview still has me shaking my head.
<< <i>The thing that bothers me about this, is the fact that these mistakes seem to be made often. Did someone say that PSA gives some sort of voucher for cards they consider EOT? And who pays when it's obviously their mistake? I sure wouldn't want to see trimmed cards slip through though.
That Dick Towle interview still has me shaking my head. >>
No voucher is given for cards returned "evid of trimming."
Unique Chicago Cards
Wrestling Cards
It must be difficult for PSA to explain how this type of mistake can happen so often... Maybe that's why they don't even try.
<< <i>tunahead08,
Thanks for the reply. I really appreciate it. Honest! >>
No worries, sorry for being a dink :-D
<< <i>I have owned it for @%*& years. >>
2587 years? WOW! (I think your shift key was stuck)
For a man your age, you seem to get around the internet alright. Good for you!