What's really cool is that your back and actively posting again.
"My friends who see my collection sometimes ask what something costs. I tell them and they are in awe at my stupidity." (Baccaruda, 12/03).I find it hard to believe that he (Trump) rushed to some hotel to meet girls of loose morals, although ours are undoubtedly the best in the world. (Putin 1/17) Gone but not forgotten. IGWT, Speedy, Bear, BigE, HokieFore, John Burns, Russ, TahoeDale, Dahlonega, Astrorat, Stewart Blay, Oldhoopster, Broadstruck, Ricko.
Very close. It's a confirmed J-167 (100% copper). What's special is that it is on a thick planchet and weighs 1.5 times normal. Here's a link: J-167 Thick
It's the most complete strike I've seen on ann LFE. Its edge is on the left. A normal J-167 is on the right.
Is it the same reverse die as the other large wreath pieces? (4 leaves under E) If so, I don't see the clash marks by the CE. If they are not there it may be an early strike original (First strike?) and not a restrike on the 1863 J-319 3¢ pattern planchet as you supposed it may be.
<< <i>Is it the same reverse die as the other large wreath pieces? (4 leaves under E) If so, I don't see the clash marks by the CE. If they are not there it may be an early strike original (First strike?) and not a restrike on the 1863 J-319 3¢ pattern planchet as you supposed it may be. >>
My theory has always been to wait and see, though Saul Teichman suggested it may be it was struck on a planchet meant for a J-319. There are several factors which come into play, but I tend to agree with you.
Comments
<< <i>reeded edge? >>
Looks like in the reflection.
Specializing in 1854 and 1855 large FE patterns
<
Specializing in 1854 and 1855 large FE patterns
<
Lestrrr
<< <i>The planchet is thin? >>
Very close. It's a confirmed J-167 (100% copper). What's special is that it is on a thick planchet and weighs 1.5 times normal. Here's a link: J-167 Thick
It's the most complete strike I've seen on ann LFE. Its edge is on the left. A normal J-167 is on the right.
Specializing in 1854 and 1855 large FE patterns
<
<< <i>The SEM-EDX analysis shows 15% cocoa powder, 40% milk fat, and 45% sweetener. >>
GOT IT!!!
Specializing in 1854 and 1855 large FE patterns
<
What is the assigned grade?
Mark
Just messin, that's pretty neat
<< <i>A most excellent coin Rick and it is plated as J168 in the ninth edition of the Judd book. Is it available? >>
It's NGC PF65BN and NO F^&%$! WAY!
Specializing in 1854 and 1855 large FE patterns
<
<< <i>Rick,
did you acquire it attributed incorrectly on the holder or what is it even holdered? >>
Bought it holdered as J-168; tested out J-167. Just recently noticed it was thick. I had thought the weight was a typo.
Specializing in 1854 and 1855 large FE patterns
<
<< <i>Is it the same reverse die as the other large wreath pieces? (4 leaves under E) If so, I don't see the clash marks by the CE. If they are not there it may be an early strike original (First strike?) and not a restrike on the 1863 J-319 3¢ pattern planchet as you supposed it may be. >>
My theory has always been to wait and see, though Saul Teichman suggested it may be it was struck on a planchet meant for a J-319. There are several factors which come into play, but I tend to agree with you.
Specializing in 1854 and 1855 large FE patterns
<
Specializing in 1854 and 1855 large FE patterns
<