Home U.S. Coin Forum
Options

Anyone else feel the sting of the Odyssey Marine ruling today?

WeissWeiss Posts: 9,942 ✭✭✭✭✭
Stock is down ~40% on this news:

Deep-sea explorers may lose vast treasure to Spain

By MITCH STACY, Associated Press Writer Mitch Stacy, Associated Press Writer – 9 mins ago

TAMPA, Fla. – Florida deep-sea explorers who raised an estimated $500 million treasure from the 200-year-old wreck of a Spanish galleon should give all the loot back to Spain, a federal magistrate judge said.

But the two-year tug-of-war over the 17 tons of silver coins and other artifacts from what is believed to be the Nuestra Senora de las Mercedes y las Animas is likely far from over.

Odyssey Marine Exploration said it will oppose Wednesday's written recommendation by U.S. Magistrate Judge Mark Pizzo, which will be considered by another federal judge who will issue an order later.

Odyssey created an international stir when it announced in May 2007 that the 500,000 silver coins and other artifacts had been raised from an Atlantic Ocean wreck and flown back to Tampa. Spain then went to U.S. District Court claiming ownership of the treasure if it is in any way connected to the country's national heritage.

Link to article
We are like children who look at print and see a serpent in the last letter but one, and a sword in the last.
--Severian the Lame

Comments

  • Options
    rgCoinGuyrgCoinGuy Posts: 7,478
    That just aint right. But as it says, it's not over yet.
    imageQuid pro quo. Yes or no?
  • Options
    drwstr123drwstr123 Posts: 7,053 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The greed of Governments exceeds that of the individual.
  • Options
    habaracahabaraca Posts: 2,106 ✭✭✭✭✭
    This may be an over simplification but who really SHOULD own the property.

    Why should the original owner lose his or her rights just because time has passed or they didn't have the
    ability or knowlegde to find or recover it.

    Lets say your Great Great grandfather lost something in the river 100 years ago.
    You didn't know about it or where it was lost was so couldn't look for it.
    Some other person with the ability to go look in the river finds it......So it is now automatically his
    That is just not right
    Wouldn't you want your Familiy stuff back?????



    Finders Keepers, losers weepers, is a childs rule.






  • Options
    JCMhoustonJCMhouston Posts: 5,306 ✭✭✭
    Except this isn't their family stuff so the argument does not apply, and even if it did the answer is no. In this particular case they could have looked for the vessels anytime in the past 30-50 years if they wanted, instead they rely on some stale argument that it's part of their national heritage. So they want soemone else to do all the work, then they simply steal it from them.

    The treasure in question was pillaged and looted form the south and central american areas they laid waste too. Not exactly family heirlooms in my view.
  • Options
    CoinosaurusCoinosaurus Posts: 9,654 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The general principle is that title never passes if original ownership can be proven.

    I expect that the Spanish government would need a substantial paper trail to back up their claim.
  • Options
    WeissWeiss Posts: 9,942 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I hope this is simply one part of a complicated dance where Spain eventually agrees to settle with them out of court for a percentage. Honestly, that seems fair.
    We are like children who look at print and see a serpent in the last letter but one, and a sword in the last.
    --Severian the Lame
  • Options
    OchoRealesOchoReales Posts: 1,500
    All I know is that Greg Stemm and Seahawk Deep Ocean Technology (Odyssey's predessor) stuck me with worthless stock after they went belly up and never looked to convert my SDOT stock to Odyssey. That was $2000, back in 1992 (if I remember correctly). I guess that what goes around comes around!

    Gary
    Lurker since '02. Got the seven year itch!

    Gary
  • Options
    Frankly...if anyone could and should claim paramount ownership rights here...IT IS NOT SPAIN!!!!!

    Spain's "inquisitorial" ancestors literally stole the gold and silver (and other assorted "treasures") from the native peoples of Central and South America...

    Sooooooo...who really has a bonafide claim here?

    Re: Slabbed coins - There are some coins that LIVE within clear plastic and wear their labels with pride... while there are others that HIDE behind scratched plastic and are simply dragged along by a label. Then there are those coins that simply hang out, naked and free image
  • Options
    291fifth291fifth Posts: 25,199 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I'll bet they don't do any more exploration without a prior written agreement with anyone who might have a claim on what they are seeking.


    All glory is fleeting.
  • Options
    ambro51ambro51 Posts: 14,386 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I rode OMR stock way up and sold at nearly 10$. Made a 'boatload' of money on that

    that was when this black swan treasure was first discovered two years ago.
  • Options
    MrEurekaMrEureka Posts: 24,716 ✭✭✭✭✭
    All I know is that Greg Stemm and Seahawk Deep Ocean Technology (Odyssey's predessor) stuck me with worthless stock after they went belly up and never looked to convert my SDOT stock to Odyssey.

    Why would the investors in the new company want to give you free shares?
    Andy Lustig

    Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.

    Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.
  • This content has been removed.
  • Options
    GrumpyEdGrumpyEd Posts: 4,749 ✭✭✭
    I think it might not be a total loss, they'll argue the case more and in the end if they don't win it Odyssey still probably gets a salvage claim for the recovery that might be a big amount.

    It also seemed that Spain broke laws by robbing the Odyssey salvage ship and mistreating the crew when they stopped it in international waters so they should pay for doing it.
    Ed
  • Options
    International waters= International maritime law. seems that any country that lost a ship hundreds of years ago can lay claim to anyone who finds it now, and in this case the Spaniards stole it to begin with so how in the hell can they lay claim to stolen goods?

    becuz Pisso sez so?

    ludicrous....absolutely ludicrous
  • Options
    coinmickeycoinmickey Posts: 767 ✭✭
    As I recall, this result was not entirely unexpected or at least unanticipated.
    Rufus T. Firefly: How would you like a job in the mint?

    Chicolini: Mint? No, no, I no like a mint. Uh - what other flavor you got?



    image
  • Options
    WalmannWalmann Posts: 2,806
    This is a good read on the general principals of salvage and abandonment. Fairly short and to the point of most issues.

    Maritime Salvage Law by Michal Barnette
  • Options
    partagaspartagas Posts: 2,056 ✭✭✭
    This was all very shady on Odyssey's part. They raised the treasure and quickly flew it out on a cargo plane to Florida. Never disclosing the location. Claiming they found it in an empty ocean bed with no way of determining the ships origins. That is a load of crap. They knew it was a spainish warship thus having soveriegn immunity and knew that Spain wouldn't give them a dime. So they did it in a deceptive manner to try and fool people and got what they deserve.

    The only ones with a legit beef are the Native Central/South Americans who where slaughtered for the greater glory of Spain and her conquests. They should file claim agaisnt the treasure.
    If I say something in the woods, and my wife isn't around. Am I still wrong?
  • This content has been removed.
  • Options
    coolestcoolest Posts: 2,281 ✭✭✭
    Considering that only Odyssey knows what they brought up, its seems hard for anyone to claim anything. Any rare treasures may already be sold.
  • Options
    GrumpyEdGrumpyEd Posts: 4,749 ✭✭✭
    They will talk about this on CNBC in 2 minutes after the commercials.

    image
    Ed
  • Options
    YaHaYaHa Posts: 4,220
    I know some of you like me and some don't but here's my take.

    First things first.. Spain, if they win they should have to pay salvage fees and every other fee that a third party is owed for their services..

    Next, there is no question in my mind that they should work out some kind of agreement and Odyssey should prevail with the higher percentage of ownership..

    Also, you know damn well someone has scoured through the contents and chosed very carefully the most valued specimans that were found for future black market profit if they have to go that way or has already done so.

    If Odyssey does lose, a night time fishing trip would be planned and every last item they pulled up from the oceans depths should be dumped and make the smart asses get it themselves.. (GREED) is not a good thing.

    I think what they have done for many countries already finding ships that were never located or were not in the place of record.

    This has put many families of love ones to ease and is something special.. There is no reason for other countries to get involved for the loot after the fact.. Odyssey will prevail in my opinion, if they don't well read again what I would do above..

    Sorry, I have found many items on Florida beaches and those who lost them, well I did the same thing that others did when I lost my valuables.. Nothing.. I owned them or sold them.. End of story.
  • Options
    partagas:

    Interesting comments. Can you provide the facts that back up the statements that you purport to be true?

    I didn't think so.
  • Options
    HalfStrikeHalfStrike Posts: 2,202 ✭✭✭
    Apparently most of the coins aboard the ship Mercedes were from merchants returning to Spain after many years of working for their wealth. So most of the treasure if it is from that ship was not Spain's to begin with.

    it will be interesting to see how the court rules in this case, this plunge today was only based on a recommendation.



  • Options
    OchoRealesOchoReales Posts: 1,500


    << <i>Frankly...if anyone could and should claim paramount ownership rights here...IT IS NOT SPAIN!!!!!

    Spain's "inquisitorial" ancestors literally stole the gold and silver (and other assorted "treasures") from the native peoples of Central and South America...

    Sooooooo...who really has a bonafide claim here? >>



    As my wife is Bolivian and the vast majority of the silver came from Indian slave labor from Potosi, I'd say that the Bolivian government would have a justifiable claim!

    Gary
    Lurker since '02. Got the seven year itch!

    Gary
  • Options
    OchoRealesOchoReales Posts: 1,500


    << <i>All I know is that Greg Stemm and Seahawk Deep Ocean Technology (Odyssey's predessor) stuck me with worthless stock after they went belly up and never looked to convert my SDOT stock to Odyssey.

    Why would the investors in the new company want to give you free shares? >>



    Hmm? Maybe because legal and moral don't always run concurrent and this would have been the right thing to do regardless of legal manuvering that allowed the principals of SDOT to simple leave the guys like me 'high and dry', no pun intended!

    Gary
    Lurker since '02. Got the seven year itch!

    Gary
  • Options
    That sucks.


    I treasure hunt when I can, very seldom anymore.



    200 years? Spain will have any and all records on the ship. Spain has some extensive archives.
  • Options
    TwoSides2aCoinTwoSides2aCoin Posts: 45,070 ✭✭✭✭✭
    You go exploring the ocean and find a treasure. A judge says you can't keep it. Go dump it where you found it.
    Hasta luego.
  • Options
    BoomBoom Posts: 10,165
    Finders - keepers.

    Had someone not taken the initiative & all involved to seek and find this,
    it would still be lying undiscovered on the Ocean floor. PERIOD!

    True??

    I rest!
  • Options
    joebb21joebb21 Posts: 4,809 ✭✭✭✭✭
    spain had the same informaiton that odyssey has. if they wanted it they could have invested and gone for it. If it came up with nothing- then they lost. oddysey invested and came out
    go odyssey!
    ps- once those coins get released the pop reports are going to be FLUSH!!!
    may the fonz be with you...always...
  • Options
    slipgateslipgate Posts: 2,301 ✭✭
    They have no moral or legal obligation to return anything to Spain. That is as ludicrous as it comes. They should be counter-suing Spain for the treatment they got and crimes against them.

    I really pity the Liberals on this board that feel that Spain is entitled to any of it. You are part of the problem.
    My Registry Sets! PCGS Registry
  • Options
    partagaspartagas Posts: 2,056 ✭✭✭
    They have no moral or legal obligation to return anything to Spain. That is as ludicrous as it comes. They should be counter-suing Spain for the treatment they got and crimes against them.

    I really pity the Liberals on this board that feel that Spain is entitled to any of it. You are part of the problem.



    That isn't true, they are claiming because it is a warship it has soveriegn immunity. This is still in play today, as it protects our ships and subs from being raided by our enemies.

    That is why the Chinese had to allow us to disassemble the crippled spy plane that landed on there territory years ago and remove it piece by piece. We would have to do the same if it happened to them.
    If I say something in the woods, and my wife isn't around. Am I still wrong?
  • Options
    CoinHuskerCoinHusker Posts: 5,034 ✭✭✭
    If this ruling stands what's the incentive ot treasure hunt? image
    Collecting coins, medals and currency featuring "The Sower"
  • Options
    partagaspartagas Posts: 2,056 ✭✭✭
    Obyssey's only real play is shift the burden on Spain to prove the cargo came from one of their warships.
    If I say something in the woods, and my wife isn't around. Am I still wrong?
  • Options
    partagaspartagas Posts: 2,056 ✭✭✭
    If this ruling stands what's the incentive ot treasure hunt?

    Odyssey when it can does cut deals on shipwreck arrest sites. They currently have some in place with Britain. The have a predetermined arrangement for salvage of identified vessels. This is the best way to do it, as you avoid the potential litigation that Odyssey found itself in.

    If I say something in the woods, and my wife isn't around. Am I still wrong?
  • Options
    partagaspartagas Posts: 2,056 ✭✭✭
    partagas:

    Interesting comments. Can you provide the facts that back up the statements that you purport to be true?

    I didn't think so.


    I really don't want to hijack this thread but how in the world did they find a shipwreck if they didn't know what it was or what they were looking for. That is like finding a needle in a haystack. Those treasure ships cost a fortune to operate and they just can't blindly trawl open water and hope to find something. And by some miracle not one piece of identifiable wreckage was found. That warship had cannons on board. They are down there somewhere close to the cargo. Cannons don't disintegrate.
    If I say something in the woods, and my wife isn't around. Am I still wrong?
  • Options
    291fifth291fifth Posts: 25,199 ✭✭✭✭✭
    It looks to me like Odyssey tried to pull a fast one and got caught. They know what the maritime salvage rules are ... and if they don't they should have.
    All glory is fleeting.
  • Options
    <<It looks to me like Odyssey tried to pull a fast one and got caught. They know what the maritime salvage rules are ... and if they don't they should have.>>

    What did they try to pull a fast one on? I dont think the Spanish govt spent millions of dollars and countless hours of research and time to find it.


  • Options
    Gary Kinder's book "Ship of Gold in the Deep Blue Sea" is a good read about Tommy Thompson's search and recovery of the SS Central America. The organization and research needed to pull together a recovery effort costs tens of millions and years of labor.

    I can't imagine people going to such effort and money spent not having any claim to the artifacts recovered.
    Garrow

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file