NewP 82 CC Opinions welcome .. Added unholdered pics

MasterGuns · March 21, 2009 8:37PM

Picked this up yesterday for a reasonable price. Nice and clean. The reverse has PL qualities.

Maybe a slight doubling in the date

And this looks like a die gouge or strike through

Thanks,
Ray

Edited to add unholdered pics

Here they are freed up

golfer72 · March 21, 2009 8:41PM

Nice CC there. Looks like a 64 to me.

darktone · March 21, 2009 8:43PM

The haze is distracting- is that PVC?

MasterGuns · March 21, 2009 8:47PM

Thanks Golfer. I'm thinking 64 also

Darktone... a little more specific. What haze where?

darktone · March 21, 2009 8:56PM

I don't know if I can point it out any better than your excellent pictures show.

anablep · March 21, 2009 11:09PM

Looks great. 63 maybe 64.

jgrinz · March 21, 2009 11:21PM

Strike and details are nice but I will refrain from a grade as I think there are too many rim
issues to do so unless a CC asides itself from those.

Real Nice coin though ...

MasterGuns · March 21, 2009 11:57PM

Should I get it out of this holder and into my Dansco? I haven't taken it out and inspected the rim yet

PerryHall · March 22, 2009 12:06AM

<< <i>Strike and details are nice but I will refrain from a grade as I think there are too many rim
issues to do so unless a CC asides itself from those. >>

What rim issues? Looks like a typical large silver coin that has spent some time being moved around in a canvas bag. Nice coin. I would expect it to slab as a MS63 or 64 on a good day.

AUandAG · March 22, 2009 12:39AM

Nice, but those thick plastic holders hide to much to give a grade. Take it out
and reshoot, would love to see it naked!

bob

MasterGuns · March 22, 2009 1:26AM

Per request... Nekid pics added in OP

golfer72 · March 22, 2009 1:42AM

Rim issues? Not even noticeable unless you look for them.

anablep · March 22, 2009 1:47AM

I still say 63, but I don't think 64.

Still a nice coin & a CC is always a treat to own...

jgrinz · March 22, 2009 2:06AM

<< <i>Rim issues? Not even noticeable unless you look for them. >>

I absolutely look for rim damage , HOWEVER, the holder must have been magnifying
the areas of my concern as the OUT OF HOLDER pictures look far better ( reflections ?? )
than the originals.

My concern now is of staining, being a CC though, it will probably pass as a 63 with the hit on the breast feathering dropping
it a notch. The fields pretty nice on this coin.

Excellent coin for a dansco if that is what you were hoping for

JRocco · March 22, 2009 2:40AM

Here is my 82 CC in a PCGS rattler 64 for comparison

MasterGuns · March 22, 2009 3:51AM

Thanks everyone. Should I leave well enough alone or maybe a few seconds in some acetone before putting it in my folder? Has a very noticeable thumb print in front of Liberty's nose.

MasterGuns · March 22, 2009 6:17AM

This one has probably been in that holder since it was released from the treasury back in the 60s. Agree there is a lot of haze (no thanks to the holder).

dwssws · March 22, 2009 6:35AM

nice coin! and with my new glasses looks even better

MasterGuns · March 22, 2009 10:09AM

Just once for the night owls

AUandAG · March 22, 2009 11:15AM

Nice again! I'd say the reverse actually drags this one down. It's a nice
MS63. PL is out of the question as the cartwheels are just too bold.

Wonderful full strike, like most CC's.

bob

NewP 82 CC Opinions welcome .. Added unholdered pics

Comments

Leave a Comment