Im 33% done with my gold panda date/denom set!

I passed another milestone yesterday with the delivery of a 1995 gold 1/4 oz panda. That piece put me just past the 1/3rd threshhold on my way to completing the entire regular issued gold panda date/denomination set. The gold panda was created in 1982, and has been a very popular collectable ever since. With the design change each year (except 2001-02), and the 5 different sizes (just 4 sizes for 1982), this set has something for any budget. Currently, counting the 2009 coins, there are a staggering 139 different coins to complete the whole set. Even more impressive is the fact that a complete set will weigh 53.15 troy ounces of pure gold!!! Although I have 61 different coins so far, my total weight is just 17.80 troy ounces, thus putting me right at 1/3rd completion. With current gold prices, this is a very slow going process for all but the very wealthy. Below is a photo of my collection so far, minus 2 smaller coins in slabs that would have taken up too much room. It doesnt look like much, but this is over 17 troy ounces of gold.

0
Comments
<< <i>It doesnt look like much, but this is over 17 troy ounces of gold. >>
My BUTT it doesn't look like much, it looks like A LOT more than 17oz's of gold!
Congrats on hitting a great milestone. Once you hit 50+% you will feel SO good with yourself, and it will all be downhill from there.
Of course, it's going to be tough having to pick up each year-set plus other dates as you continue to build the collection, but it shouldn't be too bad.
I would like to personally congratulate you ....... now what was the address again !!! Of course I would like to see your collection firsthand, please have it on display .... don't worry about cleaning the house I won't stay long
Grats on the milestone.
nice going!
I think that qualifies as a hoard!
Cathy
edited to add: Do eye spy a 1 troy ounce 2009? I don't have one of those yet.
Andrew
<< <i>It doesnt look like much, but this is over 17 troy ounces of gold >>
Seems like an odd way to store bullion;
wouldn't this be more efficient?