Newbie asking for a grade opinion. 1883-O Morgan

I've only started collecting coins in the last few months, after inheriting a few Morgans and an 1866 2 cent. I'm very much a novice when it comes to coin grades, so I wanted to ask for opinions before I sent my first coin in for grading.


As you can tell, I'm also a novice at photographing coins.
Thanks in advance for your thoughts!
-Jim


As you can tell, I'm also a novice at photographing coins.

Thanks in advance for your thoughts!
-Jim
0
Comments
No break in luster 64/65
Break in luster PQ58
- Marcus Tullius Cicero, 106-43 BC
I give away money. I collect money.
I don’t love money . I do love the Lord God.
I also have one of those GSA slabbed Carson City Morgans, from 1884. The rest of my Morgans are very worn.
Thanks for the insight, guys!
So my guess would be 1) If not cleaned or rubbed MS64 due to the weak strike limiting the grade a bit along with the hits in the field to the left of the eagle or 2) BB'ed for cleaning.
Nice coin though! All Morgans are IMO
K
edited 'cause the second set of photos showed up while I was typing...same conclusion though!
<< <i>One day you have to share your photo tricks it looks great the coin, the single fine line around her eyes will for me but it a MS63 nice even luster over the coin and even on both sides. Very nice coin >>
I have a Macro setting on my fairly cheap camera. Makes a difference when you get in really close.
Here's my 1921 S
And here's my GSA slabbed CC. Tough to get shots of with the reflection.
especially spotting cleaned coins which will not grade
before sending them in,
or
you will waste $ like many here have.
the first 2 probably don't warrant the trip in, IMO
"“Those who sacrifice liberty for security/safety deserve neither.“(Benjamin Franklin)
"I only golf on days that end in 'Y'" (DE59)
<< <i>What are the telltale signs of a cleaned coin? Is it just too bright for its age, or are there marks to look for? >>
For one thing, the 83-O Morgan has too much reflectivity on the eagle's breast (which also exhibits wear), and there are other points on the coin that indicate outright polishing. When you see brightly polished looking areas in the open fields (say in the area central to the eagles body on the reverse) which fade to more subdued reflectivity near the devices, that's a good indication of cleaning. It's where whatever was used to shine the coin couldn't effectively reach.
You can also turn the coin under a strong light - at oblique angles you will see hairline scratches in and around the polished areas. Theis would be a result of abrasive wiping of the delicate coin surfaces. Sometimes a high-speed dremel type tool will be used for buffing, with an attempt to simulate mint "cartwheel" or luster. This is called "whizzing" but is really just another form of surface cleaning and polishing.
Hope that helps.
Check out my current listings: https://ebay.com/sch/khunt/m.html?_ipg=200&_sop=12&_rdc=1
The 21-S just looks like a little bit of pocket friction, au-58
That cc is sweet looking, 63 easy.
BS&T
Ebay: + <waitin'> NEG: Chameleoncoins
NonBST/Ebay:
WTB: Toners, BU Darkside, Sovs & 20 Mark, LMU/SMU Gold.
<< <i>AU58 cleaned >>
I second this opinion
Recipient of the coveted "You Suck" award, April 2009 for cherrypicking a 1833 CBHD LM-5, and April 2022 for a 1835 LM-12, and again in Aug 2012 for picking off a 1952 FS-902.
you go farther back then me
<< <i>Would not send any of the raw Morgans in cause they look cleaned. Also, I would have that GSA holdered at NGC because the coin is more desirable in a GSA holder. >>
<< <i>newbie??????
you go farther back then me >>
I usually lurk in the sports collectibles forums.
Thanks for all of your help, guys! I didn't buy any of the coins I have except for the 1921, which only set me back $12. The rest were given to me. I've always been interested in older coins, and since I'm weaning myself off of hockey cards, I'm moving forward with coins.