No. I missed it entirely. Everything I would have bid on went way above my means anyway, i.e. the Heenan-Sayers issues (of which there were recent eBay sales of at much lower levels), the Brian Boru dollars and a few select others.
“A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly."
“A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly."
<< <i>He had THREE of them! This particular one was in his collection since 1959. Hopefully, it will be in its new home for a long time. >>
Time to break out the Charmin!
“A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly."
<< <i>No. I missed it entirely. Everything I would have bid on went way above my means anyway, i.e. the Heenan-Sayers issues (of which there were recent eBay sales of at much lower levels), the Brian Boru dollars and a few select others. >>
I once owned a steel hub for the Brian Boru dollar. Gawd, what a paperweight that was for my desk!!!!! TD
Numismatist. 50 year member ANA. Winner of four ANA Heath Literary Awards; three Wayte and Olga Raymond Literary Awards; Numismatist of the Year Award 2009, and Lifetime Achievement Award 2020. Winner numerous NLG Literary Awards.
Someone who really really really wanted it, apparently!
It looks like I won several pieces, but nothing noteworthy. There's a comment on the site that invoices will go out on Monday.
I guess I agree with Bear that the prices were reasonable for the quality, but remember that this auction included some *incredibly* rare pieces in spectacular grades. I have a database of 18,000 auction appearances of So-Called Dollars, and this auction had multiples of several pieces where I previously recorded zero appearances. I was hoping that maybe one or two of the less obviously rare pieces might slip through where I could pick them off at reasonable prices. Nope!
Because several of these pieces were in the one-known category, I can trace prices fairly easily. The HK-876a (Denver Mint Opening in Silver) sold this week for $5000, previously sold in 1996 for $1000. Lot 10260 (HK-245 "AKERUE" die trial) sold this week for $2000, previously sold in 1988 for for $56. Not a bad investment, either of those.
Of course, it's a little painful to think of a few things that have appeared on eBay in the last year or two where I didn't bid because I thought $100 was too much, only to see similar pieces sell now for $500 or $1000. Oh, well!
<< <i>I guess I agree with Bear that the prices were reasonable for the quality, but remember that this auction included some *incredibly* rare pieces in spectacular grades. I have a database of 18,000 auction appearances of So-Called Dollars, and this auction had multiples of several pieces where I previously recorded zero appearances. I was hoping that maybe one or two of the less obviously rare pieces might slip through where I could pick them off at reasonable prices. Nope! >>
That’s interesting. In your estimation, how often does an old-time collection like this come to the block?
It is my understanding that the graded lots have the Weber provenance on the label. That alone brings a new facet to my collection.
It’s unbelievable that the second part of the auction, the mail-bid portion contained duplicates. It seemed to me that the duplicates brought just as strong or stronger bids. Anyone else get the same impression?
<< <i>That’s interesting. In your estimation, how often does an old-time collection like this come to the block? >>
Not often, although there was another large So-Called Dollar collection sold last summer because of the death of the owner. Off the top of my head, I can think of three sales in the 1990s of similar size, and at least 2 more in the 1980s. This sale was a little unusual because Weber was focusing specifically on California pieces, and did a phenomenal job of that, too.
<< <i>t’s unbelievable that the second part of the auction, the mail-bid portion contained duplicates. It seemed to me that the duplicates brought just as strong or stronger bids. Anyone else get the same impression? >>
...and LOTS of others. The auction house clearly wasn't separating good stuff from bad stuff, but simply didn't want to overload the live section with too many lots.
...and LOTS of others. The auction house clearly wasn't separating good stuff from bad stuff, but simply didn't want to overload the live section with too many lots. >>
It may be more extreme than that. I don't think your Mail-bid figures include the buyers premium.
I am just blown away by that HK 252. The live auction example was graded MS62PL. The mail-bid example is raw, and in my opinion, looks cleaned. Yet it brought double the money.
Thanks for the perspective on past auctions. Which was the auction from last summer? I must have missed that!
Comments
For the quality, I thought that the prices
were reasonable and realistic., at least for
the slug facsimalies.
Camelot
<< <i>Yup, I won 10018, 19973, 10112, 10404.
For the quality, I thought that the prices
were reasonable and realistic. >>
I assume that 19973 is actually 10073.
Those are some pretty slugs!
I wanted to add to my collection of 1894 MidWinter Exposition dollars. I bid what I felt was very strong money, but I was blown out of the water!
"Everything is on its way to somewhere. Everything." - George Malley, Phenomenon
http://www.american-legacy-coins.com
Coin Rarities Online
including the" Bear Collection",auctioned by the Goldbergs
on Feb-2009. It should be on line after jan/1/09.
It will probably total 300- 400 pieces.
Camelot
<< <i>Yes,there will be three large collections of So Called Dollars,
including the" Bear Collection",auctioned by the Goldbergs
on Feb-2009. It should be on line after jan/1/09.
It will probably total 300- 400 pieces. >>
Any relation?
- Marcus Tullius Cicero, 106-43 BC
<< <i>HK 485
These are VERY hard to find.
- Marcus Tullius Cicero, 106-43 BC
<< <i>
<< <i>HK 485
These are VERY hard to find.
He had THREE of them! This particular one was in his collection since 1959. Hopefully, it will be in its new home for a long time.
specializing in the SLUGS now.
Camelot
<< <i>Yes It is my SCD Collection. I am
specializing in the SLUGS now. >>
It's ironic. Last week I did not have a single slug. Now, after a weak moment, I seem to have a small collections of them.
<< <i>He had THREE of them! This particular one was in his collection since 1959. Hopefully, it will be in its new home for a long time. >>
Time to break out the Charmin!
- Marcus Tullius Cicero, 106-43 BC
<< <i>No. I missed it entirely. Everything I would have bid on went way above my means anyway, i.e. the Heenan-Sayers issues (of which there were recent eBay sales of at much lower levels), the Brian Boru dollars and a few select others.
I once owned a steel hub for the Brian Boru dollar. Gawd, what a paperweight that was for my desk!!!!!
TD
Camelot
<< <i>Who won the 10481 ? >>
Someone who really really really wanted it, apparently!
It looks like I won several pieces, but nothing noteworthy. There's a comment on the site that invoices will go out on Monday.
I guess I agree with Bear that the prices were reasonable for the quality, but remember that this auction included some *incredibly* rare pieces in spectacular grades. I have a database of 18,000 auction appearances of So-Called Dollars, and this auction had multiples of several pieces where I previously recorded zero appearances. I was hoping that maybe one or two of the less obviously rare pieces might slip through where I could pick them off at reasonable prices. Nope!
Because several of these pieces were in the one-known category, I can trace prices fairly easily. The HK-876a (Denver Mint Opening in Silver) sold this week for $5000, previously sold in 1996 for $1000. Lot 10260 (HK-245 "AKERUE" die trial) sold this week for $2000, previously sold in 1988 for for $56. Not a bad investment, either of those.
Of course, it's a little painful to think of a few things that have appeared on eBay in the last year or two where I didn't bid because I thought $100 was too much, only to see similar pieces sell now for $500 or $1000. Oh, well!
Stefanie
.
CoinsAreFun Toned Silver Eagle Proof Album
.
Gallery Mint Museum, Ron Landis& Joe Rust, The beginnings of the Golden Dollar
.
More CoinsAreFun Pictorials NGC
<< <i>I guess I agree with Bear that the prices were reasonable for the quality, but remember that this auction included some *incredibly* rare pieces in spectacular grades. I have a database of 18,000 auction appearances of So-Called Dollars, and this auction had multiples of several pieces where I previously recorded zero appearances. I was hoping that maybe one or two of the less obviously rare pieces might slip through where I could pick them off at reasonable prices. Nope! >>
That’s interesting. In your estimation, how often does an old-time collection like this come to the block?
It is my understanding that the graded lots have the Weber provenance on the label. That alone brings a new facet to my collection.
It’s unbelievable that the second part of the auction, the mail-bid portion contained duplicates. It seemed to me that the duplicates brought just as strong or stronger bids. Anyone else get the same impression?
<< <i>That’s interesting. In your estimation, how often does an old-time collection like this come to the block? >>
Not often, although there was another large So-Called Dollar collection sold last summer because of the death of the owner. Off the top of my head, I can think of three sales in the 1990s of similar size, and at least 2 more in the 1980s. This sale was a little unusual because Weber was focusing specifically on California pieces, and did a phenomenal job of that, too.
<< <i>t’s unbelievable that the second part of the auction, the mail-bid portion contained duplicates. It seemed to me that the duplicates brought just as strong or stronger bids. Anyone else get the same impression? >>
Fact, not impression. Easy enough to confirm:
HK number -- Live lot: price / Mail lot: price
HK-149 -- 10245: $920 / 10625: $500
HK-250gilt -- 10271: $374 / 10644: $425
HK-252 -- 10274: $316 / 10646: $600
HK-254 -- 10281: $316 / 10652: $375
HK-256 -- 10286: $489 / 10656: $375
...and LOTS of others. The auction house clearly wasn't separating good stuff from bad stuff, but simply didn't want to overload the live section with too many lots.
<< <i> Fact, not impression. Easy enough to confirm:
HK number -- Live lot: price / Mail lot: price
HK-149 -- 10245: $920 / 10625: $500
HK-250gilt -- 10271: $374 / 10644: $425
HK-252 -- 10274: $316 / 10646: $600
HK-254 -- 10281: $316 / 10652: $375
HK-256 -- 10286: $489 / 10656: $375
...and LOTS of others. The auction house clearly wasn't separating good stuff from bad stuff, but simply didn't want to overload the live section with too many lots. >>
It may be more extreme than that. I don't think your Mail-bid figures include the buyers premium.
I am just blown away by that HK 252. The live auction example was graded MS62PL. The mail-bid example is raw, and in my opinion, looks cleaned. Yet it brought double the money.
Thanks for the perspective on past auctions. Which was the auction from last summer? I must have missed that!
<< <i>I've heard the best so-called dollar collection is going to be auctioned by Goldberg's at Long beach in February. Any truth to that? >>
Anyone attend the auction?