Options
Uncirculated vs. Mint State

Based on current "market grading" they are not the same. Many holdered "mint state" coins are not the equivalent of the old "uncirculated."
True "uncirculated" coins have no wear. Many "mint state" coins do exhibit wear.
Your comments?
True "uncirculated" coins have no wear. Many "mint state" coins do exhibit wear.
Your comments?
All glory is fleeting.
0
Comments
not circulated and in thus UNCIRCULATED. How else could it be?
One and the same to me, just west coast and east coast lingo.
bob
MS = UNC and always has. Maybe you are under the impression that people didn't overgrade in the "good old days"? Sorry, wrong.
Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.
Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.
This baloney about an uncirculated coin having never circulated is just that, baloney. All coins are circulated, technically, as soon as they leave the mint. By the pure definition of uncirculated, only a coin pulled directly from the press and then holdered would "truely" be uncirculated.
To promote wear as in the "wearing down of the surface" and create luster breaks, is incredibly difficult to do. Luster breaks do take a while to form on current copper nickel clad coins and even 90% silver coins.
I've got a pocketful of 40% Silver Clad IKEs that I've been beating up for nearly 3 months now and they are still AU coins.
The name is LEE!
MS = UNC
Best,
Sunnywood
Sunnywood's Rainbow-Toned Morgans (Retired)
Sunnywood's Barber Quarters (Retired)
Ike Specialist
Finest Toned Ike I've Ever Seen, been looking since 1986
Ike Specialist
Finest Toned Ike I've Ever Seen, been looking since 1986
Best,
Sunnywood
Sunnywood's Rainbow-Toned Morgans (Retired)
Sunnywood's Barber Quarters (Retired)
If Mint Sate = Uncirculated than What i did on the toilet = ???
I believe he means that there are many coins encased in slabs that state they are "Mint State", but are in actuality what would be termed "sliders" or choice AU-58's with very minimal wear and very nice eye appeal and strikes. We all know that the TPG’s (especially PCGS) slabs coins based on value, not on technical grade. Therefore there are coins labeled as Mint State that aren't.
The question is...which coin is better to own?
Such is the state of things…that is why it is best to always buy the coin, and not the holder…at least that is MHO...
QN
Go to Early United States Coins - to order the New "Early United States Half Dollar Vol. 1 / 1794-1807" book or the 1st new Bust Quarter book!
<< <i>Me thinks the OP meant something else than what you have all been answering...
I believe he means that there are many coins encased in slabs that state they are "Mint State", but are in actuality what would be termed "sliders" or choice AU-58's with very minimal wear and very nice eye appeal and strikes. We all know that the TPG’s (especially PCGS) slabs coins based on value, not on technical grade. Therefore there are coins labeled as Mint State that aren't.
The question is...which coin is better to own?
Such is the state of things…that is why it is best to always buy the coin, and not the holder…at least that is MHO...
QN >>
I definitely agree. There are many coins with a touch of rub or luster break that can go either way at the TPGs. When submitting a coin with a bit of cabinet friction, as an example, The coin may grade AU58 or MS61, depending on a number of factors, one of which I believe is value. The 81-S Morgan will likely 58 every time. The early Bust Dollar would be more likely to get the 61 if it was really nice. Therefore MS and Unc may not be the same, at least for certain coins. There is an element or market acceptability involved. JMHO.
merse