Home U.S. Coin Forum

1930-D Lincoln error

This looks to me like an engraving error. Got these pics from the owner. Look at the marks just under the nose and tie and on the lips, which are all "recessed." Looks like the engraver did some touch-up chiseling there...probably to the hub (which is the positive impression)...then, imparted to the die, then, to the planchet. Can't confirm it...too late for that. Best I can do is just go off what this looks like. So...what does it look like to you? How do you think these marks were caused? Thank you.
Kurt

Comments

  • seanqseanq Posts: 8,733 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Gotta be honest, I can't see anything in those pictures. It's very unlikely that the dies were toughed up by an engraver. A recessed mark on the coin would most likely be from circulation wear or an impact from another coin in a bag pr pocket. If there were any engraving lines on a die they would appear as raised lines on a coin struck by it.


    Sean Reynolds
    Incomplete planchets wanted, especially Lincoln Cents & type coins.

    "Keep in mind that most of what passes as numismatic information is no more than tested opinion at best, and marketing blather at worst. However, I try to choose my words carefully, since I know that you guys are always watching." - Joe O'Connor
  • Thanks, Sean. What about engraving marks on the hub? Look at these side-by-sides and think of the four marks as having been made to the "positive," the hub. I just can't see these types of marks as having been made by chance, and certainly not by any coin.
    Kurt
  • GrumpyEdGrumpyEd Posts: 4,749 ✭✭✭
    Maybe it's reduction lathe doubling.

    I've seen something like it on a lot of cents, mostly from the 30s.

    image

    You might check this thread on coppercoins:
    (it's about later dates but I've seen it on ones from the 30s)

    thread on coppercoins
    Ed
  • I read the thread and I'll have to sleep on it and look into this further when I get a chance tomorrow. But I understand a little bit about the reduction step, and I can see how the images referenced in the thread could result. I appreciate this, Ed. I don't know about those marks on the lips, though, and right now I'm still leaning towards a reworked hub.
  • mozeppamozeppa Posts: 4,431 ✭✭✭
    ejection damage.


  • << <i>ejection damage. >>



    I just never saw that as capable of leaving that kind of damage. I think it makes more sense than my explanation, though, especially given the look of that date and mint mark, too. Thanks mozeppa and all for your help on this one.
    Kurt
  • errormavenerrormaven Posts: 1,170 ✭✭✭
    The photos are poor, but to me it looks like machine doubling. Some forms of machine doubling push metal to the side and pile it up in low ridges.
    Mike Diamond is an error coin writer and researcher. Views expressed here do not necessarily reflect those held by any organization I am a member of.
  • AUandAGAUandAG Posts: 24,940 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Open a photobucket.com account and upload your images to it and then copy the bottom code under your
    pic and paste directly into your forum text box.
    Those pics are way too small.
    and a hardy WELCOME as well!
    bobimage
    Registry: CC lowballs (boblindstrom), bobinvegas1989@yahoo.com

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file