comments/grade for my new no motto saint

Comments

• tightbudget Posts: 7,299 ✭✭✭

  October 25, 2008 12:07PM

  Great pictures...I think coin is AU because I think I see rub on the breasts and knee. Either that or I should get my eyes checked.

  0
• messydesk Posts: 20,431 ✭✭✭✭✭

  October 25, 2008 1:04PM

  I see a flat spot on the knee, but I'm not sure that its wear. I don't see wear along the top edge of the eagle's wing. No heavy marks except for two smooshed rays on the obverse, just generally ticky and with a decent strike (as it should have for this date). Pretty nice looking coin. I'm going to say 63. PIctures are pretty good, too.

  John
  Keeper of the VAM Catalog • Professional Coin Imaging • Prime Number Set • World Coins in Early America • British Trade Dollars • Variety Attribution

  0
• darktone Posts: 8,437 ✭✭✭

  October 25, 2008 1:15PM

  63 if not for the obverse mark I would say 64. nice!

  0
• PerryHall Posts: 47,025 ✭✭✭✭✭

  October 25, 2008 8:54PM

  
  
  << <i>63 if not for the obverse mark I would say 64. nice! >>
  
  

  Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
  "Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
  "Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire

  0
• GoldenEyeNumismatics Posts: 13,187 ✭✭✭

  October 26, 2008 12:03AM

  63

  0
• Broadstruck Posts: 30,497 ✭✭✭✭✭

  October 26, 2008 12:16AM

  I feel it's a Slider based on the obverse image... but has a decent facial strike as these always are seen mushy.

  To Err Is Human.... To Collect Err's Is Just Too Much Darn Tootin Fun!
  

  0
• RYK Posts: 35,800 ✭✭✭✭✭

  October 26, 2008 12:56AM

  I like the original skin

  My Box of 20: https://pcgs.com/setregistry/collectors-showcase/box-20/ryks-gold-box-20/17132

  0