1921 D TPG Graded... Guess the grade

Comments

• cheezhed Posts: 6,011 ✭✭✭✭✭

  October 23, 2008 2:22PM

  MS63

  Many happy BST transactions

  0
• blu62vette Posts: 11,945 ✭✭✭✭✭

  October 23, 2008 2:26PM

  I think 63, one potential reason are the hits on the neck that I think may be a little reduced in the picture.

  http://www.bluccphotos.com" target="new">BluCC Photos Shows for onsite imaging: Nov Baltimore, FUN, Long Beach http://www.facebook.com/bluccphotos" target="new">BluCC on Facebook

  0
• Unknown

  October 23, 2008 2:36PM

  This content has been removed.
• MacCrimmon Posts: 7,058 ✭✭✭

  October 23, 2008 2:39PM

  The cheek looks to have some hairlining. Without seeing the actual coin to determine if that is actual "wear", I'd gues it's either AU58, or MS63.

  0
• kurtdog Posts: 1,456

  October 23, 2008 2:43PM

  Is that a hit of some kind on the bridge of the sniffer or am I seeing things?

  0
• kurtdog Posts: 1,456

  October 23, 2008 2:46PM

  Oh, I forgot my grade. I'll agree with MacCrimmon; same reasons.

  0
• HighRelief Posts: 3,720 ✭✭✭✭✭

  October 23, 2008 2:50PM

  I would say MS63 all day long, tomorrow and next week.

  0
• CoinJunkie Posts: 8,772 ✭✭✭✭✭

  October 23, 2008 3:02PM

  I was going to say 64, but based on your PQ comment, I'll go with 63.
  

  My Roosevelt Dime Registry Set

  0
• ccmorgan Posts: 1,232 ✭✭✭

  October 23, 2008 4:40PM

  Obverse looks 65 all day. 21's aren't known for great strikes.
  Reverse breast feathers look...worn? Anyone else see that?
  
  So I'll go MS64

  Love the 1885-CC Morgan

  0
• darktone Posts: 8,437 ✭✭✭

  October 23, 2008 7:39PM

  62

  0
• Placid Posts: 11,299 ✭✭✭

  October 23, 2008 7:54PM

  64

  0
• halfhunter Posts: 2,770 ✭✭✭

  October 23, 2008 9:06PM

  MS-62
  
  Regards, John

  Need the following OBW rolls to complete my 46-64 Roosevelt roll set:
  1947-P & D; 1948-D; 1949-P & S; 1950-D & S; and 1952-S.
  Any help locating any of these OBW rolls would be gratefully appreciated!

  0
• Steve27 Posts: 13,275 ✭✭✭

  October 23, 2008 9:12PM

  Weak strike MS64.

  "It's far easier to fight for principles, than to live up to them." Adlai Stevenson

  0
• options26 Posts: 1,431

  October 23, 2008 9:34PM

  I already know, but it does look good for the assigned grade.
  
  On the bright side, I don't think you will ever have to worry about a down grade.

  Life member of the SSDC

  0
• ldhair Posts: 7,351 ✭✭✭✭✭

  October 23, 2008 9:46PM

  I would guess it's in a 62 or 63 holder but The image looks to be a 64

  Larry
  
  

  0
• direwolf1972 Posts: 2,076 ✭✭✭

  October 24, 2008 1:13AM

  It appears there is a slight bit of rub. ANACS agrees and says AU58.
  
  A shame since it has very clean fields. I've seen MS64's with about the same amount facial dings.
  
  

  I'll see your bunny with a pancake on his head and raise you a Siamese cat with a miniature pumpkin on his head.
  
  You wouldn't believe how long it took to get him to sit still for this.
  
  
  

  0
• kurtdog Posts: 1,456

  October 24, 2008 2:12AM

  Do you see those dark areas on the obverse? That's how wear appears in a photo. But that can be deceiving, at times, and in fact be simple photography/lighting shadow. That's why I agreed, they called this one either 58 or 63. I also agree, if there were no evidence of wear or "rub," etc. - based on the minimal level of bag hits, and on the fact that these 21s are not known to be the best of strikes - this coin could very reasonably even rate with the 64s.

  0