I don't see a problem with that. Personally, I think that the issue of keyword spamming is pretty weak. Unless you're clearly intending to deceive, I don't see a problem with trying to attract more people to your item. Who knows, it could be an unrelated term that brings you to an item that you might really enjoy. The folks who raise the "keyword spam" flag on non maliciously titled items need to get another hobby.
<< <i>I don't see a problem with that. Personally, I think that the issue of keyword spamming is pretty weak. Unless you're clearly intending to deceive, I don't see a problem with trying to attract more people to your item. Who knows, it could be an unrelated term that brings you to an item that you might really enjoy. The folks who raise the "keyword spam" flag on non maliciously titled items need to get another hobby. >>
Most of the people who report for keyword spamming are competeing sellers many of which are guilty of the same practices.
"Most of the people who report for keyword spamming are competeing sellers many of which are guilty of the same practices."
////////////////////////
VERY true.
KWS is a huge problem in fashion/electronics categories.
If a buyer searches for "new shirt," used-clothing sellers who use "like new" in their titles totally ruin the buyer's search.
new ipod
like new ipod
BOTH mean the same thing to the search engine. This leads to HUGE numbers of NPBs because buyers refuse to read the listings until AFTER they buy; they just look at the titles and bid/buy.
Folks Who Bite Get Bitten. Folks Who Don't Bite Get Eaten.
<< <i>I don't see a problem with that. Personally, I think that the issue of keyword spamming is pretty weak. Unless you're clearly intending to deceive, I don't see a problem with trying to attract more people to your item. Who knows, it could be an unrelated term that brings you to an item that you might really enjoy. The folks who raise the "keyword spam" flag on non maliciously titled items need to get another hobby. >>
Looking for 1970 MLB Photostamps - uncut
Positive Transactions - tennesseebanker, Ahmanfan, Donruss, Colebear, CDsNuts, rbdjr1, Downtown1974, yankeeno7, drewsef, mnolan, mrbud60, msassin, RipublicaninMass, AkbarClone, rustywilly, lsutigers1973, julen23 and nam812, plus many others...
<< <i>"Most of the people who report for keyword spamming are competeing sellers many of which are guilty of the same practices."
////////////////////////
VERY true.
KWS is a huge problem in fashion/electronics categories.
If a buyer searches for "new shirt," used-clothing sellers who use "like new" in their titles totally ruin the buyer's search.
new ipod
like new ipod
BOTH mean the same thing to the search engine. This leads to HUGE numbers of NPBs because buyers refuse to read the listings until AFTER they buy; they just look at the titles and bid/buy. >>
This works.... new ipod -like
That would return all searches with keywords new and ipod, but the minus sign says dont show searches with keyword like
I do it all the time for those turds that say NO AUTO e.g. Topps archives auto* -(no,2002)
So what? If he listed Jeter in the same manner (if he was on the card) it would still be acurate and not unreaosnable. I think you need to not worry so much about such trivial things.
Comments
ebay i.d. clydecoolidge - Lots of vintage stars and HOFers, raw, condition fully disclosed.
<< <i>I don't see a problem with that. Personally, I think that the issue of keyword spamming is pretty weak. Unless you're clearly intending to deceive, I don't see a problem with trying to attract more people to your item. Who knows, it could be an unrelated term that brings you to an item that you might really enjoy. The folks who raise the "keyword spam" flag on non maliciously titled items need to get another hobby. >>
Most of the people who report for keyword spamming are competeing sellers many of which are guilty of the same practices.
////////////////////////
VERY true.
KWS is a huge problem in fashion/electronics categories.
If a buyer searches for "new shirt," used-clothing sellers who use "like new" in their titles
totally ruin the buyer's search.
new ipod
like new ipod
BOTH mean the same thing to the search engine. This leads to HUGE numbers of NPBs
because buyers refuse to read the listings until AFTER they buy; they just look at the
titles and bid/buy.
<< <i>I don't see a problem with that. Personally, I think that the issue of keyword spamming is pretty weak. Unless you're clearly intending to deceive, I don't see a problem with trying to attract more people to your item. Who knows, it could be an unrelated term that brings you to an item that you might really enjoy. The folks who raise the "keyword spam" flag on non maliciously titled items need to get another hobby. >>
Looking for 1970 MLB Photostamps
- uncut
Positive Transactions - tennesseebanker, Ahmanfan, Donruss, Colebear, CDsNuts, rbdjr1, Downtown1974, yankeeno7, drewsef, mnolan, mrbud60, msassin, RipublicaninMass, AkbarClone, rustywilly, lsutigers1973, julen23 and nam812, plus many others...
<< <i>"Most of the people who report for keyword spamming are competeing sellers many of which are guilty of the same practices."
////////////////////////
VERY true.
KWS is a huge problem in fashion/electronics categories.
If a buyer searches for "new shirt," used-clothing sellers who use "like new" in their titles
totally ruin the buyer's search.
new ipod
like new ipod
BOTH mean the same thing to the search engine. This leads to HUGE numbers of NPBs
because buyers refuse to read the listings until AFTER they buy; they just look at the
titles and bid/buy. >>
This works....
new ipod -like
That would return all searches with keywords new and ipod, but the minus sign says dont show searches with keyword like
I do it all the time for those turds that say NO AUTO e.g. Topps archives auto* -(no,2002)
<< <i>Unless you're clearly intending to deceive, I don't see a problem with trying to attract more people to your item. >>
It is a clear act to decieve...they want people to see it that are looking for griffey...
<< <i>Griffey is on the card too. Big deal. If I was Griffey fan, that might entice me to buy it. >>
no big deal except for either griffey or jeter is on ALL of the goudey graphs...
If so then that may be a reason for it to be titled the way it was.
Steve