What a shame

Comments

• Russ Posts: 48,514 ✭✭✭

  July 23, 2008 11:37AM

  Looks like a Large Date to me.
  
  Russ, NCNE

  eBay consignment sales | | Collectibles from Resco CCC

  0
• tightbudget Posts: 7,299 ✭✭✭

  July 23, 2008 11:38AM

  
  
  << <i>Looks like a Large Date to me.
  
  Russ, NCNE >>
  
  
  
  

  0
• Iampoorman2 Posts: 207 ✭

  July 23, 2008 11:42AM

  You guys are the experts. I was just guessing. But it's still a shame.

  A 1943 copper Lincoln will still only buy a gumball out of the machine, but you can purchase the machine and the store with that same cent.

  0
• GrumpyEd Posts: 4,749 ✭✭✭

  July 23, 2008 11:44AM

  Can you zoom in on the date?

  Ed

  0
• cmerlo1 Posts: 7,960 ✭✭✭✭✭

  July 23, 2008 11:44AM

  Definitely large date- the 9 is wrong and 'LIBERTY' is too sharp. I see a lot of proof sets from this era with this type of toning (but I agree with you- usually more attractive). I don't think the holders were air-tight at all!

  You Suck! Awarded 6/2008- 1901-O Micro O Morgan, 8/2008- 1878 VAM-123 Morgan, 9/2022 1888-O VAM-1B3 H8 Morgan | Senior Regional Representative- ANACS Coin Grading. Posted opinions on coins are my own, and are not an official ANACS opinion.

  0
• pheh Posts: 1,588 ✭

  July 23, 2008 12:19PM

  Hard to tell with the glare - but my diagnostics tend to gear toward a 7 even with the date - this one appears to dip.
  
  And a thicker-in-the-middle "0" - this one looks thin.
  
  1970-S large.

  0
• Rampage Posts: 9,512 ✭✭✭✭✭

  July 23, 2008 12:50PM

  I agree, 100 percent large date.

  0
• Coll3ctor Posts: 3,355 ✭✭✭

  July 23, 2008 1:24PM

  
  
  << <i>I agree, 100 percent large date. >>
  
  
  
  
  
  +1

  0