Options
ANYONE KNOW THE DATE OF THIS LARGE CENT?
![seateddime](https://us.v-cdn.net/6027503/uploads/authoricons/1844dimepcgs63.jpg)
??
![image](http://i157.photobucket.com/albums/t60/coincollector2007/coins094-1.jpg)
I seldom check PM's but do check emails often jason@seated.org
Buying top quality Seated Dimes in Gem BU and Proof.
Buying great coins - monster eye appeal only.
Buying top quality Seated Dimes in Gem BU and Proof.
Buying great coins - monster eye appeal only.
0
Comments
QN
Go to Early United States Coins - to order the New "Early United States Half Dollar Vol. 1 / 1794-1807" book or the 1st new Bust Quarter book!
bob
Ray
<< <i>1810, don't you see that big roman numeral in the coin?????
bob
PCGS Registries
Box of 20
SeaEagleCoins: 11/14/54-4/5/12. Miss you Larry!
edit: with another look I'm changing my call to almost certainly S91. I'm shocked that this attribution could be made in this condition.
Too bad it is scratched or it would holder as I believe PCGS would agree with me on the date. --jerry
<< <i>Based on the juxtaposition of the T and the forelocks it is almost certainly a 96. The lips and close broad pole make me guess S90 or S91, the last 2 liberty cap varieties. Got a photo of the reverse?
edit: with another look I'm changing my call to almost certainly S91. I'm shocked that this attribution could be made in this condition.
Too bad it is scratched or it would holder as I believe PCGS would agree with me on the date. --jerry >>
Gardnerville, NV
=========================
Our Website -->Innovation, Native & Presidential Dollar Errors, Lincoln Cents and more
Check it out --> Our eBay Auctions
and scratching their butt.
Wadda it is?
<< <i>1796 S84,85, 86, or 87 - reverse? >>
Joecopper,
The s-8x's doen't have the right hair position. You can see the right leg of the R above the forelock and the T. That points just to the S-91. --jerry
<< <i>Based on the juxtaposition of the T and the forelocks it is almost certainly a 96. The lips and close broad pole make me guess S90 or S91, the last 2 liberty cap varieties. Got a photo of the reverse?
edit: with another look I'm changing my call to almost certainly S91. I'm shocked that this attribution could be made in this condition.
Too bad it is scratched or it would holder as I believe PCGS would agree with me on the date. --jerry >>
I'm impressed- seriously.
-Randy Newman