Home U.S. Coin Forum

Gold Liberty Pattern Edited...

hiijackerhiijacker Posts: 1,172 ✭✭✭
I am helping the seller sell this coin on Heritage, do you think the lint showing in the picture is distracting? Should I ask Heritage to reshoot the picture?

Edit*** Link removed due to pushy peer poster pressure and persuasion. Now say that 10 times fast.
Buyer of all vintage Silver Bars. PM me
Cashback from Mr. Rebates

Comments

  • GFourDriverGFourDriver Posts: 2,366
    Shameless plug.
  • I would agree. Keep the lint
    RACC
    I have neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself to a man who rises and sleeps under the blanket of the very freedom I provide, then question the manner in which I provide it. I prefer you said thank you, and went on your way, Otherwise, I suggest you pick up a weapon, and stand to post. Either way, I don't give a damn what you think you are entitled to!
  • hiijackerhiijacker Posts: 1,172 ✭✭✭


    << <i>Shameless plug. >>



    This is my first consignment and I am not trying to plug anything. In fact I will remove this post after my question is answered.

    How is that?
    Buyer of all vintage Silver Bars. PM me
    Cashback from Mr. Rebates
  • GFourDriverGFourDriver Posts: 2,366
    I couldn't see the lint, so it can't be too distracting..... besides it was said in jest.
  • NHSBaseballNHSBaseball Posts: 2,470
    Actually I do find the lint and fuzz distracting, and had to zoom in to see that it was lint, and not a flaw with the coin's surfaces. If I was selling or consigning the coin, I would definitely ask Heritage to reshoot the pictures.

    I think it's a legitimate concern.

    "College men from LSU- went in dumb, come out dumb too..."
    -Randy Newmanimage
  • MikeInFLMikeInFL Posts: 10,188 ✭✭✭✭
    It is a bit distracting, but frankly I wouldn't think someone purchasing this coin would rely on the image, so no, I wouldn't have it reimaged.
    Collector of Large Cents, US Type, and modern pocket change.
  • RWBRWB Posts: 8,082
    The bronze pattern is likely one of William Barber’s attempts to fix problems with James Longacre’s original design and also lower relief to improve die life and striking. Bronze versions of intermediate and final designs were routinely sent to Mint Director Linderman for approval. These immediately became part of his private collection. Bronze was used because it was cheap, readily available and did not affect the bullion accounts.

    In 1877 a small (ie: unknown) number of “high relief” $20 were released by the Philadelphia Mint. This occurred because William Barber did not get final approval for his revised design, and the relief was too high. Linderman got complaints from the San Francisco Mint and “hit the roof” when he learned Barber ahd made and distributed working dies without final authorization. All the SF coins were melted before distribution, but at least one batch had already left the Philadelphia Mint before Linderman’s order. To date, no one has identified an 1877 high relief $20.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file